The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/464 |
Resumo: | In the Greek mythology, the god Kronos swallowed his children after birth, in order not to be dethroned and thus to perpetuate himself in power. The Brazilian State, when represented by the Judiciary, in seeking ways to provide access to qualified justice, has been overusing extrajudicial forms – which at community level have provided differentiated approaches to conflict – but such overuse has transformed these extrajudicial decisions into rules of traditional jurisdiction. The present study aims at analyzing the perspective of the Judiciary at implementing alternatives to adjudicated decisions, by means of editing norms that keep it as a centralizing entity, through self-determined means outlined under its order. The research is based on the bibliographical method and contains an examination of the doctrine and legislation connected to the theme, as well as the hypothetical-deductive approach and monographic procedure method. In this understanding, one wonders: from the myth of the Greek god Kronos, is it possible to identify an excess – by the Judiciary – in subtracting consensual ways of resolving conflicts in order to retain the monopoly of jurisdiction? The incessant intervention of the Brazilian Judiciary is incontestable in covering all the questions related to the delineation of the self-composition of conflicts, infecting them with the perils of a decadent system, hence separating the citizen from the access to justice. |
id |
RDL_04fad02c32de4b7738671f8f3dbbb492 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/464 |
network_acronym_str |
RDL |
network_name_str |
Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justiceO poder judiciário e o mito grego do deus Cronos: a judicialização dos meios consensuais de solucionar conflitos e o monopólio de acesso à justiçaaccess to justicejudicializationconsensual means of conflict resolutionGreek mythologyJudiciary.acesso à justiçajudicializaçãomeios consensuais de solução de conflitosmitologia gregapoder judiciário.In the Greek mythology, the god Kronos swallowed his children after birth, in order not to be dethroned and thus to perpetuate himself in power. The Brazilian State, when represented by the Judiciary, in seeking ways to provide access to qualified justice, has been overusing extrajudicial forms – which at community level have provided differentiated approaches to conflict – but such overuse has transformed these extrajudicial decisions into rules of traditional jurisdiction. The present study aims at analyzing the perspective of the Judiciary at implementing alternatives to adjudicated decisions, by means of editing norms that keep it as a centralizing entity, through self-determined means outlined under its order. The research is based on the bibliographical method and contains an examination of the doctrine and legislation connected to the theme, as well as the hypothetical-deductive approach and monographic procedure method. In this understanding, one wonders: from the myth of the Greek god Kronos, is it possible to identify an excess – by the Judiciary – in subtracting consensual ways of resolving conflicts in order to retain the monopoly of jurisdiction? The incessant intervention of the Brazilian Judiciary is incontestable in covering all the questions related to the delineation of the self-composition of conflicts, infecting them with the perils of a decadent system, hence separating the citizen from the access to justice.Na mitologia grega, o deus Cronos engolia seus filhos após o nascimento, no intuito de não ser destronado e, assim, perpetuar-se no poder. O Estado, representado pelo Poder Judiciário, ao almejar vias que possibilitem o acesso à justiça qualificado, vem balizando formas extrajudiciais – que em âmbito comunitário propiciavam uma abordagem diferenciada do conflito – e convertendo-as aos ditames da jurisdição tradicional. O presente estudo objetiva analisar a perspectiva do Poder Judiciário em implementar alternativas à decisão adjudicada, pela edição de normas que o mantém como ente centralizador, através de meios autocompositivos delineados sob seu crivo. A pesquisa vale-se de técnica bibliográfica, contendo exame da doutrina e legislação condizente ao tema, bem como utilizando o método de abordagem hipotético-dedutivo e método de procedimento monográfico. Nessa compreensão, questiona-se: a partir do mito do deus grego Cronos, é possível identificar um excesso – por parte do Poder Judiciário – de subtração das formas consensuais de solucionar conflitos, a fim de manter-se no monopólio da jurisdição? É inconteste a incessante intervenção do Poder Judiciário em abarcar todas as questões relacionadas ao deslinde da autocomposição de conflitos, eivando-as com as mazelas próprias de um sistema em decadência e afastando o cidadão do acesso à justiça. Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)2019-06-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/46410.21119/anamps.51.173-190ANAMORPHOSIS - International Journal of Law and Literature; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190ANAMORPHOSIS – Revista Internacional de Derecho y Literatura; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190ANAMORPHOSIS – Revue internationale de droit et littérature; Vol. 5 No 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190ANAMORPHOSIS - Rivista Internazionale di Diritto e Letteratura; V. 5 N. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura; v. 5 n. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-1902446-80882446-808810.21119/anamps.51.2019reponame:Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)instname:Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)instacron:RDLporenghttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/464/pdfhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/464/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2019 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literaturainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessStangherlin, Camila SilveiraSpengler, Fabiana Marion2019-07-17T16:02:17Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/464Revistahttp://rdl.org.br/seer/index.php/anampsONGhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/oairevista@rdl.org.br||henriete@rdl.org.br2446-80882446-8088opendoar:2019-07-17T16:02:17Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) - Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice O poder judiciário e o mito grego do deus Cronos: a judicialização dos meios consensuais de solucionar conflitos e o monopólio de acesso à justiça |
title |
The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice |
spellingShingle |
The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice Stangherlin, Camila Silveira access to justice judicialization consensual means of conflict resolution Greek mythology Judiciary. acesso à justiça judicialização meios consensuais de solução de conflitos mitologia grega poder judiciário. |
title_short |
The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice |
title_full |
The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice |
title_fullStr |
The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice |
title_full_unstemmed |
The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice |
title_sort |
The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice |
author |
Stangherlin, Camila Silveira |
author_facet |
Stangherlin, Camila Silveira Spengler, Fabiana Marion |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Spengler, Fabiana Marion |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Stangherlin, Camila Silveira Spengler, Fabiana Marion |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
access to justice judicialization consensual means of conflict resolution Greek mythology Judiciary. acesso à justiça judicialização meios consensuais de solução de conflitos mitologia grega poder judiciário. |
topic |
access to justice judicialization consensual means of conflict resolution Greek mythology Judiciary. acesso à justiça judicialização meios consensuais de solução de conflitos mitologia grega poder judiciário. |
description |
In the Greek mythology, the god Kronos swallowed his children after birth, in order not to be dethroned and thus to perpetuate himself in power. The Brazilian State, when represented by the Judiciary, in seeking ways to provide access to qualified justice, has been overusing extrajudicial forms – which at community level have provided differentiated approaches to conflict – but such overuse has transformed these extrajudicial decisions into rules of traditional jurisdiction. The present study aims at analyzing the perspective of the Judiciary at implementing alternatives to adjudicated decisions, by means of editing norms that keep it as a centralizing entity, through self-determined means outlined under its order. The research is based on the bibliographical method and contains an examination of the doctrine and legislation connected to the theme, as well as the hypothetical-deductive approach and monographic procedure method. In this understanding, one wonders: from the myth of the Greek god Kronos, is it possible to identify an excess – by the Judiciary – in subtracting consensual ways of resolving conflicts in order to retain the monopoly of jurisdiction? The incessant intervention of the Brazilian Judiciary is incontestable in covering all the questions related to the delineation of the self-composition of conflicts, infecting them with the perils of a decadent system, hence separating the citizen from the access to justice. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/464 10.21119/anamps.51.173-190 |
url |
https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/464 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21119/anamps.51.173-190 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/464/pdf https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/464/pdf_1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ANAMORPHOSIS - International Journal of Law and Literature; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190 ANAMORPHOSIS – Revista Internacional de Derecho y Literatura; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190 ANAMORPHOSIS – Revue internationale de droit et littérature; Vol. 5 No 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190 ANAMORPHOSIS - Rivista Internazionale di Diritto e Letteratura; V. 5 N. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura; v. 5 n. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190 2446-8088 2446-8088 10.21119/anamps.51.2019 reponame:Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) instname:Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL) instacron:RDL |
instname_str |
Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL) |
instacron_str |
RDL |
institution |
RDL |
reponame_str |
Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) |
collection |
Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) - Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@rdl.org.br||henriete@rdl.org.br |
_version_ |
1809209865862643712 |