The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Stangherlin, Camila Silveira
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Spengler, Fabiana Marion
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/464
Resumo: In the Greek mythology, the god Kronos swallowed his children after birth, in order not to be dethroned and thus to perpetuate himself in power. The Brazilian State, when represented by the Judiciary, in seeking ways to provide access to qualified justice, has been overusing extrajudicial forms – which at community level have provided differentiated approaches to conflict – but such overuse has transformed these extrajudicial decisions into rules of traditional jurisdiction. The present study aims at analyzing the perspective of the Judiciary at implementing alternatives to adjudicated decisions, by means of editing norms that keep it as a centralizing entity, through self-determined means outlined under its order. The research is based on the bibliographical method and contains an examination of the doctrine and legislation connected to the theme, as well as the hypothetical-deductive approach and monographic procedure method. In this understanding, one wonders: from the myth of the Greek god Kronos, is it possible to identify an excess – by the Judiciary – in subtracting consensual ways of resolving conflicts in order to retain the monopoly of jurisdiction? The incessant intervention of the Brazilian Judiciary is incontestable in covering all the questions related to the delineation of the self-composition of conflicts, infecting them with the perils of a decadent system, hence separating the citizen from the access to justice.
id RDL_04fad02c32de4b7738671f8f3dbbb492
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/464
network_acronym_str RDL
network_name_str Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
repository_id_str
spelling The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justiceO poder judiciário e o mito grego do deus Cronos: a judicialização dos meios consensuais de solucionar conflitos e o monopólio de acesso à justiçaaccess to justicejudicializationconsensual means of conflict resolutionGreek mythologyJudiciary.acesso à justiçajudicializaçãomeios consensuais de solução de conflitosmitologia gregapoder judiciário.In the Greek mythology, the god Kronos swallowed his children after birth, in order not to be dethroned and thus to perpetuate himself in power. The Brazilian State, when represented by the Judiciary, in seeking ways to provide access to qualified justice, has been overusing extrajudicial forms – which at community level have provided differentiated approaches to conflict – but such overuse has transformed these extrajudicial decisions into rules of traditional jurisdiction. The present study aims at analyzing the perspective of the Judiciary at implementing alternatives to adjudicated decisions, by means of editing norms that keep it as a centralizing entity, through self-determined means outlined under its order. The research is based on the bibliographical method and contains an examination of the doctrine and legislation connected to the theme, as well as the hypothetical-deductive approach and monographic procedure method. In this understanding, one wonders: from the myth of the Greek god Kronos, is it possible to identify an excess – by the Judiciary – in subtracting consensual ways of resolving conflicts in order to retain the monopoly of jurisdiction? The incessant intervention of the Brazilian Judiciary is incontestable in covering all the questions related to the delineation of the self-composition of conflicts, infecting them with the perils of a decadent system, hence separating the citizen from the access to justice.Na mitologia grega, o deus Cronos engolia seus filhos após o nascimento, no intuito de não ser destronado e, assim, perpetuar-se no poder. O Estado, representado pelo Poder Judiciário, ao almejar vias que possibilitem o acesso à justiça qualificado, vem balizando formas extrajudiciais – que em âmbito comunitário propiciavam uma abordagem diferenciada do conflito – e convertendo-as aos ditames da jurisdição tradicional. O presente estudo objetiva analisar a perspectiva do Poder Judiciário em implementar alternativas à decisão adjudicada, pela edição de normas que o mantém como ente centralizador, através de meios autocompositivos delineados sob seu crivo. A pesquisa vale-se de técnica bibliográfica, contendo exame da doutrina e legislação condizente ao tema, bem como utilizando o método de abordagem hipotético-dedutivo e método de procedimento monográfico. Nessa compreensão, questiona-se: a partir do mito do deus grego Cronos, é possível identificar um excesso – por parte do Poder Judiciário – de subtração das formas consensuais de solucionar conflitos, a fim de manter-se no monopólio da jurisdição? É inconteste a incessante intervenção do Poder Judiciário em abarcar todas as questões relacionadas ao deslinde da autocomposição de conflitos, eivando-as com as mazelas próprias de um sistema em decadência e afastando o cidadão do acesso à justiça.  Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)2019-06-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/46410.21119/anamps.51.173-190ANAMORPHOSIS - International Journal of Law and Literature; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190ANAMORPHOSIS – Revista Internacional de Derecho y Literatura; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190ANAMORPHOSIS – Revue internationale de droit et littérature; Vol. 5 No 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190ANAMORPHOSIS - Rivista Internazionale di Diritto e Letteratura; V. 5 N. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura; v. 5 n. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-1902446-80882446-808810.21119/anamps.51.2019reponame:Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)instname:Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)instacron:RDLporenghttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/464/pdfhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/464/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2019 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literaturainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessStangherlin, Camila SilveiraSpengler, Fabiana Marion2019-07-17T16:02:17Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/464Revistahttp://rdl.org.br/seer/index.php/anampsONGhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/oairevista@rdl.org.br||henriete@rdl.org.br2446-80882446-8088opendoar:2019-07-17T16:02:17Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) - Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice
O poder judiciário e o mito grego do deus Cronos: a judicialização dos meios consensuais de solucionar conflitos e o monopólio de acesso à justiça
title The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice
spellingShingle The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice
Stangherlin, Camila Silveira
access to justice
judicialization
consensual means of conflict resolution
Greek mythology
Judiciary.
acesso à justiça
judicialização
meios consensuais de solução de conflitos
mitologia grega
poder judiciário.
title_short The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice
title_full The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice
title_fullStr The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice
title_full_unstemmed The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice
title_sort The judiciary and the greek myth of Kronos: the judicialization of the consensual means for conflict solution and the monopoly of access to justice
author Stangherlin, Camila Silveira
author_facet Stangherlin, Camila Silveira
Spengler, Fabiana Marion
author_role author
author2 Spengler, Fabiana Marion
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Stangherlin, Camila Silveira
Spengler, Fabiana Marion
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv access to justice
judicialization
consensual means of conflict resolution
Greek mythology
Judiciary.
acesso à justiça
judicialização
meios consensuais de solução de conflitos
mitologia grega
poder judiciário.
topic access to justice
judicialization
consensual means of conflict resolution
Greek mythology
Judiciary.
acesso à justiça
judicialização
meios consensuais de solução de conflitos
mitologia grega
poder judiciário.
description In the Greek mythology, the god Kronos swallowed his children after birth, in order not to be dethroned and thus to perpetuate himself in power. The Brazilian State, when represented by the Judiciary, in seeking ways to provide access to qualified justice, has been overusing extrajudicial forms – which at community level have provided differentiated approaches to conflict – but such overuse has transformed these extrajudicial decisions into rules of traditional jurisdiction. The present study aims at analyzing the perspective of the Judiciary at implementing alternatives to adjudicated decisions, by means of editing norms that keep it as a centralizing entity, through self-determined means outlined under its order. The research is based on the bibliographical method and contains an examination of the doctrine and legislation connected to the theme, as well as the hypothetical-deductive approach and monographic procedure method. In this understanding, one wonders: from the myth of the Greek god Kronos, is it possible to identify an excess – by the Judiciary – in subtracting consensual ways of resolving conflicts in order to retain the monopoly of jurisdiction? The incessant intervention of the Brazilian Judiciary is incontestable in covering all the questions related to the delineation of the self-composition of conflicts, infecting them with the perils of a decadent system, hence separating the citizen from the access to justice.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/464
10.21119/anamps.51.173-190
url https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/464
identifier_str_mv 10.21119/anamps.51.173-190
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/464/pdf
https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/464/pdf_1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ANAMORPHOSIS - International Journal of Law and Literature; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190
ANAMORPHOSIS – Revista Internacional de Derecho y Literatura; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190
ANAMORPHOSIS – Revue internationale de droit et littérature; Vol. 5 No 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190
ANAMORPHOSIS - Rivista Internazionale di Diritto e Letteratura; V. 5 N. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190
ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura; v. 5 n. 1 (2019): janeiro-junho; 173-190
2446-8088
2446-8088
10.21119/anamps.51.2019
reponame:Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
instname:Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
instacron:RDL
instname_str Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
instacron_str RDL
institution RDL
reponame_str Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
collection Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) - Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@rdl.org.br||henriete@rdl.org.br
_version_ 1809209865862643712