Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Amanda Muniz
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/565
Resumo: The law and literature movement, started in 1973 in the United States with the release of The Legal Imagination, by James Boyd White, had as its main objective to reach the humanization of jurists. Although it caught the attention of several authors and spread to different countries, the initial stage of the movement, also known as law in literature, was not immune to criticism. Thus, this article, via bibliographic research, aims at presenting the criticism by Richard Posner, who mainly questions the premise that literature can humanize the jurist. Also, this paper analyzes the production by Robert Weisberg, who sees in the area an overly-romanticized view of literature. Knowing such criticism is crucial to think about the past, present and future of the movement, searching for the right answers it demands.
id RDL_55463e6ba77bc0e5e7acb77a1a10a31a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/565
network_acronym_str RDL
network_name_str Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
repository_id_str
spelling Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movementDireito e literatura: um grande mal-entendido? As críticas de Richard Posner e Robert Weisberg ao direito na literaturaLaw and literatureLaw in literatureCriticismRichard PosnerRobert Weisberg.direito e literaturadireito na literaturacríticasRichard PosnerRobert Weisberg.The law and literature movement, started in 1973 in the United States with the release of The Legal Imagination, by James Boyd White, had as its main objective to reach the humanization of jurists. Although it caught the attention of several authors and spread to different countries, the initial stage of the movement, also known as law in literature, was not immune to criticism. Thus, this article, via bibliographic research, aims at presenting the criticism by Richard Posner, who mainly questions the premise that literature can humanize the jurist. Also, this paper analyzes the production by Robert Weisberg, who sees in the area an overly-romanticized view of literature. Knowing such criticism is crucial to think about the past, present and future of the movement, searching for the right answers it demands.O law and literature movement, iniciado em 1973 nos Estados Unidos com a publicação de The Legal Imagination, de James Boyd White, tinha como objetivo principal a humanização do jurista. Embora tenha despertado a atenção de diversos autores e se difundido para vários países, esse projeto inicial do movimento, mais conhecido como direito na literatura, não será imune a críticas. Nesse sentido, o presente artigo, que utiliza como método a revisão de literatura, tem como objetivo principal apresentar as críticas de Richard Posner, que questiona principalmente a premissa segundo a qual a literatura poderia humanizar o operador do direito, e de Robert Weisberg, que identifica nos trabalhos da área uma visão romantizada da literatura. Conhecer tais críticas é fundamental para se refletir sobre os rumos que o movimento tem tomado e para que seja possível apresentar-lhes as devidas respostas.Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)2019-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/56510.21119/anamps.52.395-416ANAMORPHOSIS - International Journal of Law and Literature; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416ANAMORPHOSIS – Revista Internacional de Derecho y Literatura; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416ANAMORPHOSIS – Revue internationale de droit et littérature; Vol. 5 No 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416ANAMORPHOSIS - Rivista Internazionale di Diritto e Letteratura; V. 5 N. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura; v. 5 n. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-4162446-80882446-808810.21119/anamps.52.2019reponame:Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)instname:Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)instacron:RDLporenghttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/565/pdfhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/565/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2019 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literaturainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Amanda Muniz2020-02-18T00:16:54Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/565Revistahttp://rdl.org.br/seer/index.php/anampsONGhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/oairevista@rdl.org.br||henriete@rdl.org.br2446-80882446-8088opendoar:2020-02-18T00:16:54Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) - Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement
Direito e literatura: um grande mal-entendido? As críticas de Richard Posner e Robert Weisberg ao direito na literatura
title Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement
spellingShingle Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement
Oliveira, Amanda Muniz
Law and literature
Law in literature
Criticism
Richard Posner
Robert Weisberg.
direito e literatura
direito na literatura
críticas
Richard Posner
Robert Weisberg.
title_short Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement
title_full Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement
title_fullStr Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement
title_full_unstemmed Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement
title_sort Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement
author Oliveira, Amanda Muniz
author_facet Oliveira, Amanda Muniz
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Amanda Muniz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Law and literature
Law in literature
Criticism
Richard Posner
Robert Weisberg.
direito e literatura
direito na literatura
críticas
Richard Posner
Robert Weisberg.
topic Law and literature
Law in literature
Criticism
Richard Posner
Robert Weisberg.
direito e literatura
direito na literatura
críticas
Richard Posner
Robert Weisberg.
description The law and literature movement, started in 1973 in the United States with the release of The Legal Imagination, by James Boyd White, had as its main objective to reach the humanization of jurists. Although it caught the attention of several authors and spread to different countries, the initial stage of the movement, also known as law in literature, was not immune to criticism. Thus, this article, via bibliographic research, aims at presenting the criticism by Richard Posner, who mainly questions the premise that literature can humanize the jurist. Also, this paper analyzes the production by Robert Weisberg, who sees in the area an overly-romanticized view of literature. Knowing such criticism is crucial to think about the past, present and future of the movement, searching for the right answers it demands.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/565
10.21119/anamps.52.395-416
url https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/565
identifier_str_mv 10.21119/anamps.52.395-416
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/565/pdf
https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/565/pdf_1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ANAMORPHOSIS - International Journal of Law and Literature; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416
ANAMORPHOSIS – Revista Internacional de Derecho y Literatura; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416
ANAMORPHOSIS – Revue internationale de droit et littérature; Vol. 5 No 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416
ANAMORPHOSIS - Rivista Internazionale di Diritto e Letteratura; V. 5 N. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416
ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura; v. 5 n. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416
2446-8088
2446-8088
10.21119/anamps.52.2019
reponame:Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
instname:Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
instacron:RDL
instname_str Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
instacron_str RDL
institution RDL
reponame_str Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
collection Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) - Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@rdl.org.br||henriete@rdl.org.br
_version_ 1797174856682307584

Registros relacionados