Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/565 |
Resumo: | The law and literature movement, started in 1973 in the United States with the release of The Legal Imagination, by James Boyd White, had as its main objective to reach the humanization of jurists. Although it caught the attention of several authors and spread to different countries, the initial stage of the movement, also known as law in literature, was not immune to criticism. Thus, this article, via bibliographic research, aims at presenting the criticism by Richard Posner, who mainly questions the premise that literature can humanize the jurist. Also, this paper analyzes the production by Robert Weisberg, who sees in the area an overly-romanticized view of literature. Knowing such criticism is crucial to think about the past, present and future of the movement, searching for the right answers it demands. |
id |
RDL_55463e6ba77bc0e5e7acb77a1a10a31a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/565 |
network_acronym_str |
RDL |
network_name_str |
Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movementDireito e literatura: um grande mal-entendido? As críticas de Richard Posner e Robert Weisberg ao direito na literaturaLaw and literatureLaw in literatureCriticismRichard PosnerRobert Weisberg.direito e literaturadireito na literaturacríticasRichard PosnerRobert Weisberg.The law and literature movement, started in 1973 in the United States with the release of The Legal Imagination, by James Boyd White, had as its main objective to reach the humanization of jurists. Although it caught the attention of several authors and spread to different countries, the initial stage of the movement, also known as law in literature, was not immune to criticism. Thus, this article, via bibliographic research, aims at presenting the criticism by Richard Posner, who mainly questions the premise that literature can humanize the jurist. Also, this paper analyzes the production by Robert Weisberg, who sees in the area an overly-romanticized view of literature. Knowing such criticism is crucial to think about the past, present and future of the movement, searching for the right answers it demands.O law and literature movement, iniciado em 1973 nos Estados Unidos com a publicação de The Legal Imagination, de James Boyd White, tinha como objetivo principal a humanização do jurista. Embora tenha despertado a atenção de diversos autores e se difundido para vários países, esse projeto inicial do movimento, mais conhecido como direito na literatura, não será imune a críticas. Nesse sentido, o presente artigo, que utiliza como método a revisão de literatura, tem como objetivo principal apresentar as críticas de Richard Posner, que questiona principalmente a premissa segundo a qual a literatura poderia humanizar o operador do direito, e de Robert Weisberg, que identifica nos trabalhos da área uma visão romantizada da literatura. Conhecer tais críticas é fundamental para se refletir sobre os rumos que o movimento tem tomado e para que seja possível apresentar-lhes as devidas respostas.Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)2019-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/56510.21119/anamps.52.395-416ANAMORPHOSIS - International Journal of Law and Literature; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416ANAMORPHOSIS – Revista Internacional de Derecho y Literatura; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416ANAMORPHOSIS – Revue internationale de droit et littérature; Vol. 5 No 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416ANAMORPHOSIS - Rivista Internazionale di Diritto e Letteratura; V. 5 N. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura; v. 5 n. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-4162446-80882446-808810.21119/anamps.52.2019reponame:Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre)instname:Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)instacron:RDLporenghttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/565/pdfhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/565/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2019 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literaturainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Amanda Muniz2020-02-18T00:16:54Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/565Revistahttp://rdl.org.br/seer/index.php/anampsONGhttps://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/oairevista@rdl.org.br||henriete@rdl.org.br2446-80882446-8088opendoar:2020-02-18T00:16:54Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) - Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement Direito e literatura: um grande mal-entendido? As críticas de Richard Posner e Robert Weisberg ao direito na literatura |
title |
Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement |
spellingShingle |
Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement Oliveira, Amanda Muniz Law and literature Law in literature Criticism Richard Posner Robert Weisberg. direito e literatura direito na literatura críticas Richard Posner Robert Weisberg. |
title_short |
Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement |
title_full |
Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement |
title_fullStr |
Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement |
title_sort |
Law and literature: a misunderstood relation? The criticism of Richard Posner and Robert Weisberg to the law in literature movement |
author |
Oliveira, Amanda Muniz |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Amanda Muniz |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Amanda Muniz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Law and literature Law in literature Criticism Richard Posner Robert Weisberg. direito e literatura direito na literatura críticas Richard Posner Robert Weisberg. |
topic |
Law and literature Law in literature Criticism Richard Posner Robert Weisberg. direito e literatura direito na literatura críticas Richard Posner Robert Weisberg. |
description |
The law and literature movement, started in 1973 in the United States with the release of The Legal Imagination, by James Boyd White, had as its main objective to reach the humanization of jurists. Although it caught the attention of several authors and spread to different countries, the initial stage of the movement, also known as law in literature, was not immune to criticism. Thus, this article, via bibliographic research, aims at presenting the criticism by Richard Posner, who mainly questions the premise that literature can humanize the jurist. Also, this paper analyzes the production by Robert Weisberg, who sees in the area an overly-romanticized view of literature. Knowing such criticism is crucial to think about the past, present and future of the movement, searching for the right answers it demands. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/565 10.21119/anamps.52.395-416 |
url |
https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/565 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21119/anamps.52.395-416 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/565/pdf https://periodicos.rdl.org.br/anamps/article/view/565/pdf_1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ANAMORPHOSIS - International Journal of Law and Literature; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416 ANAMORPHOSIS – Revista Internacional de Derecho y Literatura; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416 ANAMORPHOSIS – Revue internationale de droit et littérature; Vol. 5 No 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416 ANAMORPHOSIS - Rivista Internazionale di Diritto e Letteratura; V. 5 N. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416 ANAMORPHOSIS - Revista Internacional de Direito e Literatura; v. 5 n. 2 (2019): julho-dezembro; 395-416 2446-8088 2446-8088 10.21119/anamps.52.2019 reponame:Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) instname:Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL) instacron:RDL |
instname_str |
Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL) |
instacron_str |
RDL |
institution |
RDL |
reponame_str |
Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) |
collection |
Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Anamorphosis (Porto Alegre) - Rede Brasileira Direito e Literatura (RDL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@rdl.org.br||henriete@rdl.org.br |
_version_ |
1809209866401611776 |