Strategy and performance of audiovisual streaming platforms
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Ibero Americana de Estratégia - RIAE |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uninove.br/riae/article/view/22885 |
Resumo: | Purpose: This work aims to analyze and classify the competitive strategies of 37 streaming platforms and identify which strategic groups perform better globally. Design/methodology/approach: This study is based on the structure-conduct-performance paradigm and uses Porter's typology to reach its goal. It classified the 37 platforms into their respective strategic groups based on eight strategic variables using k-means cluster analysis. Then, group performances were compared using ANOVA to test the mean differences of two performance variables. Originality/relevance: The audiovisual industry is experiencing a radical change in content consumption, distribution, and production. Streaming technology, which delivers content over the internet without downloads, increased flexibility and sparked a wave of adoption of audiovisual streaming platforms that destabilized other sectors, such as home video. Consequently, this phenomenon left a gap in studies about the strategy and performance of the industry, which this paper intends to fill. Main findings: As a result, 14% of the platforms studied were allocated to the Differentiation strategic group, 30% to Cost Leadership, 19% to Differentiation Focus, 8% to Cost Focus, and 30% were considered Stuck-In-The-Middle. We identified that the strategic groups present significant differences in performance, validating the applicability of Porter's typology. Theoretical contributions: The study found that broad-spectrum strategies such as Cost Leadership and Differentiation promote better performance than focus strategies at this industry stage. Surprisingly, Stuck-In-The-Middle companies also perform well, similar to companies with broad-spectrum strategies. |
id |
RIEOEI-1_9d2ac089534e8e1549bb056c0ccb4052 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/22885 |
network_acronym_str |
RIEOEI-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Ibero Americana de Estratégia - RIAE |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Strategy and performance of audiovisual streaming platformsEstrategia y desempeño de las plataformas de streaming audiovisualEstratégia e desempenho de plataformas audiovisuais de streamingAudiovisual Streaming IndustryStrategic GroupsCompetitive StrategiesPerformanceDisruptive Digital Transformation Industry.Streaming AudiovisualIndustria AudiovisualIndustria InnovadoraIndustria disruptivaGrupos EstratégicosEstrategias CompetitivasDesempeñoStreaming audiovisual Setor audiovisualIndústria inovadora Indústria disruptivaGrupos estratégicosEstratégias competitivasDesempenhoPurpose: This work aims to analyze and classify the competitive strategies of 37 streaming platforms and identify which strategic groups perform better globally. Design/methodology/approach: This study is based on the structure-conduct-performance paradigm and uses Porter's typology to reach its goal. It classified the 37 platforms into their respective strategic groups based on eight strategic variables using k-means cluster analysis. Then, group performances were compared using ANOVA to test the mean differences of two performance variables. Originality/relevance: The audiovisual industry is experiencing a radical change in content consumption, distribution, and production. Streaming technology, which delivers content over the internet without downloads, increased flexibility and sparked a wave of adoption of audiovisual streaming platforms that destabilized other sectors, such as home video. Consequently, this phenomenon left a gap in studies about the strategy and performance of the industry, which this paper intends to fill. Main findings: As a result, 14% of the platforms studied were allocated to the Differentiation strategic group, 30% to Cost Leadership, 19% to Differentiation Focus, 8% to Cost Focus, and 30% were considered Stuck-In-The-Middle. We identified that the strategic groups present significant differences in performance, validating the applicability of Porter's typology. Theoretical contributions: The study found that broad-spectrum strategies such as Cost Leadership and Differentiation promote better performance than focus strategies at this industry stage. Surprisingly, Stuck-In-The-Middle companies also perform well, similar to companies with broad-spectrum strategies.Propósito: Este trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar y clasificar las estrategias competitivas de 37 plataformas de streaming e identificar qué grupos estratégicos se desempeñan mejor a nivel global. Diseño/metodología/enfoque: Este estudio se basa en el paradigma estructura-conducta-desempeño y utiliza la tipología de Porter para lograr su objetivo. Clasificó las 37 plataformas en sus respectivos grupos estratégicos en función de ocho variables estratégicas utilizando un análisis de conglomerados de k-medias. Luego, se compararon los desempeños grupales utilizando ANOVA para probar las diferencias medias de dos variables de desempeño. Originalidad/relevancia: La industria audiovisual está experimentando un cambio radical en el consumo, distribución y producción de contenidos. La tecnología de streaming, que ofrece contenidos a través de Internet sin descargas, aumentó la flexibilidad y provocó una ola de adopción de plataformas de streaming audiovisual que desestabilizó otros sectores, como el del vídeo doméstico. En consecuencia, este fenómeno dejó un vacío en los estudios sobre la estrategia y el desempeño de la industria, que este artículo pretende llenar. Principales hallazgos: Como resultado, el 14% de las plataformas estudiadas se asignaron al grupo estratégico de Diferenciación, el 30% al Liderazgo en Costos, el 19% al Enfoque en Diferenciación, el 8% al Enfoque en Costos y el 30% se consideraron ‘Stuck-in-the-middle’. Identificamos que los grupos estratégicos presentan diferencias significativas en su desempeño, validando la aplicabilidad de la tipología de Porter. Contribuciones teóricas: El estudio encontró que las estrategias de amplio espectro como el liderazgo en costos y la diferenciación promueven un mejor desempeño que las estrategias de enfoque en esta etapa de la industria. Sorprendentemente, las empresas ‘Stuck-in-the-middle’ también obtienen buenos resultados, al igual que las empresas con estrategias de amplio espectro.Objetivo: Este artigo analisa e classifica as estratégias de 37 plataformas de streaming, identificando quais grupos estratégicos mostram melhor desempenho global. Concepção/metodologia/abordagem: Este estudo se baseia no paradigma estrutura-conduta-desempenho, e utiliza a tipologia de Porter para alcançar seu objetivo. Classificamos as 37 plataformas em seus respectivos grupos estratégicos, com base em oito variáveis estratégicas, utilizando a análise de cluster K-means. Em seguida, os desempenhos dos grupos foram comparados utilizando ANOVA, para testar as diferenças de médias de duas variáveis de desempenho. Originalidade/relevância: A indústria audiovisual está passando por uma mudança radical no consumo, distribuição e produção de conteúdo. A tecnologia de streaming, que fornece conteúdo pela Internet sem a necessidade de download, aumentou a flexibilidade e provocou uma onda de adoção de várias plataformas de streaming audiovisual, desestabilizando outros setores, como o de home video. Consequentemente, esse fenômeno abriu uma lacuna nos estudos sobre estratégia e desempenho do setor, que este artigo visa preencher. Principais resultados: 14% das plataformas estudadas enquadram-se no grupo estratégico de Diferenciação, 30% em Liderança em Custo, 19% em Foco em Diferenciação, 8% em Foco em Custo, e 30% foram consideradas Stuck-in-the-Middle. Os grupos estratégicos apresentaram diferenças significativas de desempenho, validando, assim, a aplicação da tipologia de Porter. Contribuição Teórica: O estudo mostra que estratégias de amplo espectro, como Liderança em Custo e Diferenciação, obtiveram melhor desempenho do que estratégias de foco neste setor. Surpreendentemente, as empresas Stuck-in-the-Middle também tiveram bom desempenho, semelhante ao das empresas com estratégias de amplo escopo.Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove2023-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/riae/article/view/2288510.5585/2023.22885Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): Continuous flow; e22885Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia; Vol. 22 Núm. 1 (2023): Continuous flow; e22885Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia; v. 22 n. 1 (2023): Fluxo contínuo; e228852176-0756reponame:Revista Ibero Americana de Estratégia - RIAEinstname:Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia (RIAE)instacron:RIEOEIengporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/riae/article/view/22885/10499https://periodicos.uninove.br/riae/article/view/22885/10498Copyright (c) 2023 Autoreshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes, Rodrigo Afonso dePaula, Fábio de OliveiraSilva, Jorge Ferreira da2023-12-19T18:46:49Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/22885Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/riaePRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/riae/oai||bennycosta@yahoo.com.br2176-07562176-0756opendoar:2023-12-19T18:46:49Revista Ibero Americana de Estratégia - RIAE - Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia (RIAE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Strategy and performance of audiovisual streaming platforms Estrategia y desempeño de las plataformas de streaming audiovisual Estratégia e desempenho de plataformas audiovisuais de streaming |
title |
Strategy and performance of audiovisual streaming platforms |
spellingShingle |
Strategy and performance of audiovisual streaming platforms Moraes, Rodrigo Afonso de Audiovisual Streaming Industry Strategic Groups Competitive Strategies Performance Disruptive Digital Transformation Industry. Streaming Audiovisual Industria Audiovisual Industria Innovadora Industria disruptiva Grupos Estratégicos Estrategias Competitivas Desempeño Streaming audiovisual Setor audiovisual Indústria inovadora Indústria disruptiva Grupos estratégicos Estratégias competitivas Desempenho |
title_short |
Strategy and performance of audiovisual streaming platforms |
title_full |
Strategy and performance of audiovisual streaming platforms |
title_fullStr |
Strategy and performance of audiovisual streaming platforms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Strategy and performance of audiovisual streaming platforms |
title_sort |
Strategy and performance of audiovisual streaming platforms |
author |
Moraes, Rodrigo Afonso de |
author_facet |
Moraes, Rodrigo Afonso de Paula, Fábio de Oliveira Silva, Jorge Ferreira da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Paula, Fábio de Oliveira Silva, Jorge Ferreira da |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moraes, Rodrigo Afonso de Paula, Fábio de Oliveira Silva, Jorge Ferreira da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Audiovisual Streaming Industry Strategic Groups Competitive Strategies Performance Disruptive Digital Transformation Industry. Streaming Audiovisual Industria Audiovisual Industria Innovadora Industria disruptiva Grupos Estratégicos Estrategias Competitivas Desempeño Streaming audiovisual Setor audiovisual Indústria inovadora Indústria disruptiva Grupos estratégicos Estratégias competitivas Desempenho |
topic |
Audiovisual Streaming Industry Strategic Groups Competitive Strategies Performance Disruptive Digital Transformation Industry. Streaming Audiovisual Industria Audiovisual Industria Innovadora Industria disruptiva Grupos Estratégicos Estrategias Competitivas Desempeño Streaming audiovisual Setor audiovisual Indústria inovadora Indústria disruptiva Grupos estratégicos Estratégias competitivas Desempenho |
description |
Purpose: This work aims to analyze and classify the competitive strategies of 37 streaming platforms and identify which strategic groups perform better globally. Design/methodology/approach: This study is based on the structure-conduct-performance paradigm and uses Porter's typology to reach its goal. It classified the 37 platforms into their respective strategic groups based on eight strategic variables using k-means cluster analysis. Then, group performances were compared using ANOVA to test the mean differences of two performance variables. Originality/relevance: The audiovisual industry is experiencing a radical change in content consumption, distribution, and production. Streaming technology, which delivers content over the internet without downloads, increased flexibility and sparked a wave of adoption of audiovisual streaming platforms that destabilized other sectors, such as home video. Consequently, this phenomenon left a gap in studies about the strategy and performance of the industry, which this paper intends to fill. Main findings: As a result, 14% of the platforms studied were allocated to the Differentiation strategic group, 30% to Cost Leadership, 19% to Differentiation Focus, 8% to Cost Focus, and 30% were considered Stuck-In-The-Middle. We identified that the strategic groups present significant differences in performance, validating the applicability of Porter's typology. Theoretical contributions: The study found that broad-spectrum strategies such as Cost Leadership and Differentiation promote better performance than focus strategies at this industry stage. Surprisingly, Stuck-In-The-Middle companies also perform well, similar to companies with broad-spectrum strategies. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/riae/article/view/22885 10.5585/2023.22885 |
url |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/riae/article/view/22885 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5585/2023.22885 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/riae/article/view/22885/10499 https://periodicos.uninove.br/riae/article/view/22885/10498 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Autores https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Autores https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): Continuous flow; e22885 Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia; Vol. 22 Núm. 1 (2023): Continuous flow; e22885 Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia; v. 22 n. 1 (2023): Fluxo contínuo; e22885 2176-0756 reponame:Revista Ibero Americana de Estratégia - RIAE instname:Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia (RIAE) instacron:RIEOEI |
instname_str |
Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia (RIAE) |
instacron_str |
RIEOEI |
institution |
RIEOEI |
reponame_str |
Revista Ibero Americana de Estratégia - RIAE |
collection |
Revista Ibero Americana de Estratégia - RIAE |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ibero Americana de Estratégia - RIAE - Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia (RIAE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bennycosta@yahoo.com.br |
_version_ |
1799138723511664640 |