Content analysis of arguments of proposed amendments to the constitution that deals with penal majority
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/281 |
Resumo: | Penal majority is the subject of 43 Proposals to amend the Constitution that aim to change currentlegislation. In order to identify the most frequent arguments present in these Proposals, their justification texts were analyzed by two different methods. In Study 1, these arguments were grouped into categories, which were submitted to an inter-judges concordance analyses. In Study 2, the justification texts were submitted to a Lexicographic Analyses using the software IRAMUTEQ. In booth studies, the most frequent arguments were: age as the only criterion to assume imputability is insufficient; the current legal order and comparative law studies provide evidence that adolescents should be held criminally responsible; changes in legislation are necessary to reduce criminality. Logical and conceptual errors, together with a lack of empirical evidences, in the Proposals’ texts, may lead to inaccurate conclusions and, consequently, to decisions that conduct to undesirable results. |
id |
RPED-1_5947e3859c1d8a4b341067781d51e8d2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/281 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Content analysis of arguments of proposed amendments to the constitution that deals with penal majorityAnálise de Conteúdo das Justificativas das Propostas de Emenda à Constituição que Tratam da Maioridade PenalPenal majority is the subject of 43 Proposals to amend the Constitution that aim to change currentlegislation. In order to identify the most frequent arguments present in these Proposals, their justification texts were analyzed by two different methods. In Study 1, these arguments were grouped into categories, which were submitted to an inter-judges concordance analyses. In Study 2, the justification texts were submitted to a Lexicographic Analyses using the software IRAMUTEQ. In booth studies, the most frequent arguments were: age as the only criterion to assume imputability is insufficient; the current legal order and comparative law studies provide evidence that adolescents should be held criminally responsible; changes in legislation are necessary to reduce criminality. Logical and conceptual errors, together with a lack of empirical evidences, in the Proposals’ texts, may lead to inaccurate conclusions and, consequently, to decisions that conduct to undesirable results.A questão da maioridade penal é tema de 43 Propostas de Emenda à Constituição que intentam mudar a legislação atual. Com o objetivo de identificar os argumentos mais frequentes nessas Propostas, os textos de suas justificativas foram analisados por dois métodos diferentes. O Estudo 1 agrupou esses argumentos em categorias, que foram submetidas à análise de concordância entre juízes. No Estudo 2, o texto das justificativas foi submetido à análise lexicográfica por meio do programa IRAMUTEQ. Em ambos os estudos, os argumentos mais recorrentes foram: o critério etário é insuficiente para presumir capacidade de imputabilidade; o ordenamento jurídico atual e o Direito Comparado evidenciam que adolescentes devem ser penalmente responsabilizados; e mudanças na legislação são necessárias à redução da criminalidade. Erros lógicos e conceituais, aliados à carência de evidências empíricas, nos textos das Propostas, podem levar a conclusões imprecisas e, consequentemente, a tomadas de decisão que conduzam a resultados indesejáveis.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2018-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/28110.19092/reed.v5i2.281Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2018): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal StudiesRevista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 5 n. 2 (2018): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2319-081710.19092/reed.v5i2reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/281/pdf_39Holanda, Ariela OliveiraOliveira-Castro, JorgeSilva, Thays da Cruzinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-07-05T16:21:12Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/281Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-07-05T16:21:12Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Content analysis of arguments of proposed amendments to the constitution that deals with penal majority Análise de Conteúdo das Justificativas das Propostas de Emenda à Constituição que Tratam da Maioridade Penal |
title |
Content analysis of arguments of proposed amendments to the constitution that deals with penal majority |
spellingShingle |
Content analysis of arguments of proposed amendments to the constitution that deals with penal majority Holanda, Ariela Oliveira |
title_short |
Content analysis of arguments of proposed amendments to the constitution that deals with penal majority |
title_full |
Content analysis of arguments of proposed amendments to the constitution that deals with penal majority |
title_fullStr |
Content analysis of arguments of proposed amendments to the constitution that deals with penal majority |
title_full_unstemmed |
Content analysis of arguments of proposed amendments to the constitution that deals with penal majority |
title_sort |
Content analysis of arguments of proposed amendments to the constitution that deals with penal majority |
author |
Holanda, Ariela Oliveira |
author_facet |
Holanda, Ariela Oliveira Oliveira-Castro, Jorge Silva, Thays da Cruz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira-Castro, Jorge Silva, Thays da Cruz |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Holanda, Ariela Oliveira Oliveira-Castro, Jorge Silva, Thays da Cruz |
description |
Penal majority is the subject of 43 Proposals to amend the Constitution that aim to change currentlegislation. In order to identify the most frequent arguments present in these Proposals, their justification texts were analyzed by two different methods. In Study 1, these arguments were grouped into categories, which were submitted to an inter-judges concordance analyses. In Study 2, the justification texts were submitted to a Lexicographic Analyses using the software IRAMUTEQ. In booth studies, the most frequent arguments were: age as the only criterion to assume imputability is insufficient; the current legal order and comparative law studies provide evidence that adolescents should be held criminally responsible; changes in legislation are necessary to reduce criminality. Logical and conceptual errors, together with a lack of empirical evidences, in the Proposals’ texts, may lead to inaccurate conclusions and, consequently, to decisions that conduct to undesirable results. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/281 10.19092/reed.v5i2.281 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/281 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v5i2.281 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/281/pdf_39 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2018): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 5 n. 2 (2018): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v5i2 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138703506931712 |