The role of ratio decidendi in the construction of súmulas vinculantes by the Brazilian Supreme Court: a case study of argumentation and bindingness of precedents

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: dos Santos, Maike Wile
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
Texto Completo: https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/203
Resumo: This paper investigates the role of ratio decidendi in the construction of the súmula vinculante n. 33, issuedby the Brazilian Supreme Court. For this, I analyzed the cases listed as “repeated cases on constitutional matters” (a requirement for approving a súmula, which is a binding precedent in Brazilian law) and therulings cited in these cases. I also analyzed the proposal of the súmula vinculante n. 33 and its related debates. My objective was to investigate whether the Court had met the requirement of “repeated cases on constitutional matters”. As a result, I concluded that the súmula vinculante n. 33 did not meet this requirement, although the Justices were concerned about it.
id RPED-1_6c5d384cda1d100af614a0894971685c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/203
network_acronym_str RPED-1
network_name_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository_id_str
spelling The role of ratio decidendi in the construction of súmulas vinculantes by the Brazilian Supreme Court: a case study of argumentation and bindingness of precedents O papel da ratio decidendi na construção de súmulas vinculantes pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal: um estudo de caso sobre argumentação e vinculação de precedentesThis paper investigates the role of ratio decidendi in the construction of the súmula vinculante n. 33, issuedby the Brazilian Supreme Court. For this, I analyzed the cases listed as “repeated cases on constitutional matters” (a requirement for approving a súmula, which is a binding precedent in Brazilian law) and therulings cited in these cases. I also analyzed the proposal of the súmula vinculante n. 33 and its related debates. My objective was to investigate whether the Court had met the requirement of “repeated cases on constitutional matters”. As a result, I concluded that the súmula vinculante n. 33 did not meet this requirement, although the Justices were concerned about it.Este artigo investiga o papel da ratio decidendi na construção da súmula vinculante nº 33, editada pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal. Para isso, analisei as decisões elencadas como “reiteradas decisões sobre matéria constitucional” e as decisões citadas nesses julgados, além da proposta de súmula e dos debates de aprovação de seu enunciado. Meu objetivo foi investigar se a Corte se adequou ao requisito “reiteradas decisões”. Como resultado, concluí que a súmula vinculante nº 33 foi aprovada desrespeitando-se esse requisito, ainda que tenha havido preocupação por parte dos ministros, nos debates de aprovação, quanto a isso.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2017-02-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/20310.19092/reed.v4i1.203Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2017): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal StudiesRevista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 4 n. 1 (2017): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2319-081710.19092/reed.v4i1reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/203/131dos Santos, Maike Wileinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-07-05T16:23:14Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/203Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2020-07-05T16:23:14Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The role of ratio decidendi in the construction of súmulas vinculantes by the Brazilian Supreme Court: a case study of argumentation and bindingness of precedents
O papel da ratio decidendi na construção de súmulas vinculantes pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal: um estudo de caso sobre argumentação e vinculação de precedentes
title The role of ratio decidendi in the construction of súmulas vinculantes by the Brazilian Supreme Court: a case study of argumentation and bindingness of precedents
spellingShingle The role of ratio decidendi in the construction of súmulas vinculantes by the Brazilian Supreme Court: a case study of argumentation and bindingness of precedents
dos Santos, Maike Wile
title_short The role of ratio decidendi in the construction of súmulas vinculantes by the Brazilian Supreme Court: a case study of argumentation and bindingness of precedents
title_full The role of ratio decidendi in the construction of súmulas vinculantes by the Brazilian Supreme Court: a case study of argumentation and bindingness of precedents
title_fullStr The role of ratio decidendi in the construction of súmulas vinculantes by the Brazilian Supreme Court: a case study of argumentation and bindingness of precedents
title_full_unstemmed The role of ratio decidendi in the construction of súmulas vinculantes by the Brazilian Supreme Court: a case study of argumentation and bindingness of precedents
title_sort The role of ratio decidendi in the construction of súmulas vinculantes by the Brazilian Supreme Court: a case study of argumentation and bindingness of precedents
author dos Santos, Maike Wile
author_facet dos Santos, Maike Wile
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv dos Santos, Maike Wile
description This paper investigates the role of ratio decidendi in the construction of the súmula vinculante n. 33, issuedby the Brazilian Supreme Court. For this, I analyzed the cases listed as “repeated cases on constitutional matters” (a requirement for approving a súmula, which is a binding precedent in Brazilian law) and therulings cited in these cases. I also analyzed the proposal of the súmula vinculante n. 33 and its related debates. My objective was to investigate whether the Court had met the requirement of “repeated cases on constitutional matters”. As a result, I concluded that the súmula vinculante n. 33 did not meet this requirement, although the Justices were concerned about it.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-02-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/203
10.19092/reed.v4i1.203
url https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/203
identifier_str_mv 10.19092/reed.v4i1.203
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/203/131
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2017): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 4 n. 1 (2017): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
2319-0817
10.19092/reed.v4i1
reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron:RPED
instname_str Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron_str RPED
institution RPED
reponame_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
collection Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138703147270144

Registros relacionados