The Judicial accounts of drug trafficking and drug use: an analysis of the first instance decisions of the Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/456 |
Resumo: | The current drug legislation established certain criteria to distinguish the crimes of drug use and trafficking, creating two different models of state response to these crimes. This research focuses on sentences related to drug trafficking crimes in order to understand how judges draw a distinction between drug users and drug traffickers. We have analyzed a sample of all the first instance sentences from the Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro in 2015 in order to establish a series of categories which allow judges to justify their decisions in drug trafficking cases. This research is an empirical qualitative legal research based on document analysis as the basic research technique. The analysis of the data was conducted through a grounded theory framing and the results point to the key role of the witnesses in the decision-making process of the judges. |
id |
RPED-1_9ef53aaa753334dd5a44c968f0c44635 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/456 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Judicial accounts of drug trafficking and drug use: an analysis of the first instance decisions of the Court of the State of Rio de JaneiroO discurso judicial sobre o tráfico e uso de drogas: uma análise das sentenças do Tribunal de Justiça do Rio de JaneiroThe current drug legislation established certain criteria to distinguish the crimes of drug use and trafficking, creating two different models of state response to these crimes. This research focuses on sentences related to drug trafficking crimes in order to understand how judges draw a distinction between drug users and drug traffickers. We have analyzed a sample of all the first instance sentences from the Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro in 2015 in order to establish a series of categories which allow judges to justify their decisions in drug trafficking cases. This research is an empirical qualitative legal research based on document analysis as the basic research technique. The analysis of the data was conducted through a grounded theory framing and the results point to the key role of the witnesses in the decision-making process of the judges.A atual lei de drogas estipulou critérios para a diferenciação entre os crimes de uso e tráfico de drogas, estabelecendo diferentes modelos de resposta estatal para esses dois crimes. Esta pesquisa debruça-se sobre sentenças que versam sobre o crime de tráfico de drogas para entender como os juízes diferenciam os crimes de uso e tráfico. A partir da análise de uma amostra de todas decisões de primeira instância do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Rio de Janeiro do ano de 2015, pudemos estabelecer uma série de categorias pelas quais os magistrados justificam a sua decisão em matéria de tráfico de drogas. Trata-se aqui de uma pesquisa empírica de cunho qualitativo, que contou com a técnica de análise de documentos como base. A análise foi realizada lançando-se mão da teorização fundamentada nos dados (TFD) e os resultados apontam, em conformidade com a literatura da área, para a centralidade da prova testemunhal na distinção entre usuários e traficantes.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2019-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/45610.19092/reed.v6i3.456Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; 140-172Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 3 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 140-1722319-081710.19092/reed.v6i3reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/456/239Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPeixoto Azeredo, Felipe FranciscoFranco Xavier, José Roberto2019-12-31T19:23:18Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/456Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2019-12-31T19:23:18Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Judicial accounts of drug trafficking and drug use: an analysis of the first instance decisions of the Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro O discurso judicial sobre o tráfico e uso de drogas: uma análise das sentenças do Tribunal de Justiça do Rio de Janeiro |
title |
The Judicial accounts of drug trafficking and drug use: an analysis of the first instance decisions of the Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro |
spellingShingle |
The Judicial accounts of drug trafficking and drug use: an analysis of the first instance decisions of the Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro Peixoto Azeredo, Felipe Francisco |
title_short |
The Judicial accounts of drug trafficking and drug use: an analysis of the first instance decisions of the Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro |
title_full |
The Judicial accounts of drug trafficking and drug use: an analysis of the first instance decisions of the Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro |
title_fullStr |
The Judicial accounts of drug trafficking and drug use: an analysis of the first instance decisions of the Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Judicial accounts of drug trafficking and drug use: an analysis of the first instance decisions of the Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro |
title_sort |
The Judicial accounts of drug trafficking and drug use: an analysis of the first instance decisions of the Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro |
author |
Peixoto Azeredo, Felipe Francisco |
author_facet |
Peixoto Azeredo, Felipe Francisco Franco Xavier, José Roberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Franco Xavier, José Roberto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Peixoto Azeredo, Felipe Francisco Franco Xavier, José Roberto |
description |
The current drug legislation established certain criteria to distinguish the crimes of drug use and trafficking, creating two different models of state response to these crimes. This research focuses on sentences related to drug trafficking crimes in order to understand how judges draw a distinction between drug users and drug traffickers. We have analyzed a sample of all the first instance sentences from the Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro in 2015 in order to establish a series of categories which allow judges to justify their decisions in drug trafficking cases. This research is an empirical qualitative legal research based on document analysis as the basic research technique. The analysis of the data was conducted through a grounded theory framing and the results point to the key role of the witnesses in the decision-making process of the judges. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/456 10.19092/reed.v6i3.456 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/456 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v6i3.456 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/456/239 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 6 No. 3 (2019): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; 140-172 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 6 n. 3 (2019): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 140-172 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v6i3 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138703641149440 |