The uses and misuses od provisional arrest: cautionary custody or anticipation of the restrictive freedom penalty?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alberto Gabriel Guimarães, Cláudio
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: de Oliveira Gamba, Cristian
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
Texto Completo: https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/558
Resumo: The present work gathers the results obtained through a case study about the performance of the Central de Inquéritos de São Luís - MA. It is a qualitative-quantitative research, of an evaluative type, based on the use of the inductive method. For this purpose, the analysis procedures of 109 judicial decisions issued by the agency between June and July 2019 were used as research procedures, as well as the compilation and organization of official data on provisional incarceration at the municipal and state level. Its main objective is to re-discuss the official legal foundations that affect the application of provisional detention at the local level. To comply with this directive, the analysis focused on unveiling the arguments used by the judges to justify the decree of provisional deprivation of liberty. It was concluded that, differently from what is passed through the official legal-criminal discourse, provisional arrests, in most of the situations verified, are not used as a precautionary measure, but as a true anticipation of the deprivation of liberty.
id RPED-1_eb688ef39eb29b789cba804e88240162
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/558
network_acronym_str RPED-1
network_name_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository_id_str
spelling The uses and misuses od provisional arrest: cautionary custody or anticipation of the restrictive freedom penalty?Os usos e abusos da prisão provisória: custódia cautelar ou antecipação da pena privativa de liberdade?Provisional arrestPenal SystemCriminal PolicyCritical CriminologyPrisão provisóriaSistema PenalPolítica CriminalCriminologia CríticaThe present work gathers the results obtained through a case study about the performance of the Central de Inquéritos de São Luís - MA. It is a qualitative-quantitative research, of an evaluative type, based on the use of the inductive method. For this purpose, the analysis procedures of 109 judicial decisions issued by the agency between June and July 2019 were used as research procedures, as well as the compilation and organization of official data on provisional incarceration at the municipal and state level. Its main objective is to re-discuss the official legal foundations that affect the application of provisional detention at the local level. To comply with this directive, the analysis focused on unveiling the arguments used by the judges to justify the decree of provisional deprivation of liberty. It was concluded that, differently from what is passed through the official legal-criminal discourse, provisional arrests, in most of the situations verified, are not used as a precautionary measure, but as a true anticipation of the deprivation of liberty.O presente trabalho congrega os resultados obtidos através da realização de um estudo de caso acerca da atuação da Central de Inquéritos de São Luís - MA. Trata-se de uma pesquisa quali-quantitativa, do tipo avaliativa, pautada na utilização do método indutivo. Para isto foram utilizados como procedimentos de pesquisa a análise de 109 decisões judiciais exaradas pelo órgão entre junho e julho de 2019, bem como a compilação e organização de dados oficiais acerca do encarceramento provisório em nível municipal e estadual. Seu objetivo principal consiste em rediscutir os fundamentos jurídicos oficiais que tangenciam a aplicação da prisão provisória em âmbito local. Para o cumprimento desta diretiva a análise focou-se em desvelar os argumentos utilizados pelos julgadores para justificar a decretação da privação provisória de liberdade. Concluiu-se que, diferentemente daquilo que é perpassado através do discurso jurídico-penal oficial, as prisões provisórias, em grande parte das situações verificadas, não são utilizadas como medida cautelar, mas sim como verdadeira antecipação da pena privativa de liberdade.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2021-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/55810.19092/reed.v8.558Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 8 (2021): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; 1-35Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 8 (2021): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-352319-081710.19092/reed.v8ireponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/558/348Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlberto Gabriel Guimarães, Cláudiode Oliveira Gamba, Cristian2021-09-28T01:55:13Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/558Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2021-09-28T01:55:13Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The uses and misuses od provisional arrest: cautionary custody or anticipation of the restrictive freedom penalty?
Os usos e abusos da prisão provisória: custódia cautelar ou antecipação da pena privativa de liberdade?
title The uses and misuses od provisional arrest: cautionary custody or anticipation of the restrictive freedom penalty?
spellingShingle The uses and misuses od provisional arrest: cautionary custody or anticipation of the restrictive freedom penalty?
Alberto Gabriel Guimarães, Cláudio
Provisional arrest
Penal System
Criminal Policy
Critical Criminology
Prisão provisória
Sistema Penal
Política Criminal
Criminologia Crítica
title_short The uses and misuses od provisional arrest: cautionary custody or anticipation of the restrictive freedom penalty?
title_full The uses and misuses od provisional arrest: cautionary custody or anticipation of the restrictive freedom penalty?
title_fullStr The uses and misuses od provisional arrest: cautionary custody or anticipation of the restrictive freedom penalty?
title_full_unstemmed The uses and misuses od provisional arrest: cautionary custody or anticipation of the restrictive freedom penalty?
title_sort The uses and misuses od provisional arrest: cautionary custody or anticipation of the restrictive freedom penalty?
author Alberto Gabriel Guimarães, Cláudio
author_facet Alberto Gabriel Guimarães, Cláudio
de Oliveira Gamba, Cristian
author_role author
author2 de Oliveira Gamba, Cristian
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alberto Gabriel Guimarães, Cláudio
de Oliveira Gamba, Cristian
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Provisional arrest
Penal System
Criminal Policy
Critical Criminology
Prisão provisória
Sistema Penal
Política Criminal
Criminologia Crítica
topic Provisional arrest
Penal System
Criminal Policy
Critical Criminology
Prisão provisória
Sistema Penal
Política Criminal
Criminologia Crítica
description The present work gathers the results obtained through a case study about the performance of the Central de Inquéritos de São Luís - MA. It is a qualitative-quantitative research, of an evaluative type, based on the use of the inductive method. For this purpose, the analysis procedures of 109 judicial decisions issued by the agency between June and July 2019 were used as research procedures, as well as the compilation and organization of official data on provisional incarceration at the municipal and state level. Its main objective is to re-discuss the official legal foundations that affect the application of provisional detention at the local level. To comply with this directive, the analysis focused on unveiling the arguments used by the judges to justify the decree of provisional deprivation of liberty. It was concluded that, differently from what is passed through the official legal-criminal discourse, provisional arrests, in most of the situations verified, are not used as a precautionary measure, but as a true anticipation of the deprivation of liberty.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/558
10.19092/reed.v8.558
url https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/558
identifier_str_mv 10.19092/reed.v8.558
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/558/348
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 8 (2021): Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; 1-35
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 8 (2021): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-35
2319-0817
10.19092/reed.v8i
reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron:RPED
instname_str Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
instacron_str RPED
institution RPED
reponame_str Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
collection Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com
_version_ 1799138703773270016

Registros relacionados