VIEWS ON RESTRICTIVE MEASURES AMONG BRAZILIAN LAWYERS DURING THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK: AN EX-PLORATORY ANALYSIS FROM RAPID RESEARCH
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
Texto Completo: | https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/642 |
Resumo: | COVID-19 has had deep impacts on the lives of individuals, organizations, and polities around the globe. Legal professionals and institutions were not absent from this story. Governments adopted different approaches to deal with the pandemic, which – at a time when social relations have become ever more judicialized – inevitably triggered legal disputes. Central to these disputes were restrictive measures such as lockdown for non-essential businesses, shelter-in-place and stay-at-home orders for communities, and compulsory quarantine for infected individuals. These disputes were further entangled with political conflict and polarization, as the case of Brazil under President Jair Bolsonaro well exemplifies. Against such backdrop, this article investigates: Did Brazilian legal professionals view those restrictive measures and the power of government entities to enact them to be consistent with ‘the law’? What explains variation in their views? By exploring data from rapid research carried out during the pandemic outbreak in Brazil, this article points to the role of variables such as pandemic understandings and experiences, political orientation and attitudes, and the nexus between legal knowledge and the State in shaping the attitude of such population. The implications to studies on legal professionals, pandemics, and the rule of law in Brazil and beyond are discussed. |
id |
RPED-1_f737745609b4aac5dfd827685c9d101c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/642 |
network_acronym_str |
RPED-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
VIEWS ON RESTRICTIVE MEASURES AMONG BRAZILIAN LAWYERS DURING THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK: AN EX-PLORATORY ANALYSIS FROM RAPID RESEARCHVisões sobre medidas restritivas entre profissionais do direito brasileiros durante o surto da COVID-19: uma análise exploratória de pesquisa rápidalegal professionalsCOVID-19empirical researchpublic healthprofissionais do direitoCOVID-19pesquisa empíricasaúde públicaCOVID-19 has had deep impacts on the lives of individuals, organizations, and polities around the globe. Legal professionals and institutions were not absent from this story. Governments adopted different approaches to deal with the pandemic, which – at a time when social relations have become ever more judicialized – inevitably triggered legal disputes. Central to these disputes were restrictive measures such as lockdown for non-essential businesses, shelter-in-place and stay-at-home orders for communities, and compulsory quarantine for infected individuals. These disputes were further entangled with political conflict and polarization, as the case of Brazil under President Jair Bolsonaro well exemplifies. Against such backdrop, this article investigates: Did Brazilian legal professionals view those restrictive measures and the power of government entities to enact them to be consistent with ‘the law’? What explains variation in their views? By exploring data from rapid research carried out during the pandemic outbreak in Brazil, this article points to the role of variables such as pandemic understandings and experiences, political orientation and attitudes, and the nexus between legal knowledge and the State in shaping the attitude of such population. The implications to studies on legal professionals, pandemics, and the rule of law in Brazil and beyond are discussed.A COVID-19 teve profundo impacto nas vidas de indivíduos, organizações e países no mundo. Profissionais e instituições do direito não estiveram ausentes dessa história. Governos adotaram diferentes abordagens para lidar com a pandemia, as quais – num contexto de relações sociais cada vez mais judicializadas – geraram inevitáveis disputas judiciais. No centro dessas disputas estiveram medidas restritivas como proibição do funcionamento de negócios não-essenciais, restrições à circulação de pessoas e quarentena obrigatória para infectados. Essas disputas foram ainda enredadas em conflitos políticos e polarização, como bem exemplifica o caso do Brasil sob Jair Bolsonaro. Nesse cenário, este artigo investiga: Os(as) profissionais do direito no Brasil entenderam as medidas restritivas e o poder de entes governamentais de editá-las como sendo consistentes com ‘o direito’? O que explica a variação nessas visões? Explorando dados de uma pesquisa rápida realizada durante o surto de pandemia no país, o artigo aponta para o papel de variáveis como compreensões e experiência da pandemia, orientação e atitudes políticas, e o nexo entre conhecimento jurídico e Estado na determinação das atitudes dessa população. Discute-se as implicações desses achados para estudos sobre profissionais do direito, pandemias e o Estado de Direito no Brasil e para além do Brasil.Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito2022-08-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/64210.19092/reed.v10.642Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-63Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-632319-081710.19092/reed.v9reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitoinstname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)instacron:RPEDporhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/642/367Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direitohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Sá e Silva, Fabio2023-04-04T15:11:03Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/642Revistahttps://reedrevista.org/reedONGhttps://reedrevista.org/reed/oaimvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com2319-08172319-0817opendoar:2023-04-04T15:11:03Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
VIEWS ON RESTRICTIVE MEASURES AMONG BRAZILIAN LAWYERS DURING THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK: AN EX-PLORATORY ANALYSIS FROM RAPID RESEARCH Visões sobre medidas restritivas entre profissionais do direito brasileiros durante o surto da COVID-19: uma análise exploratória de pesquisa rápida |
title |
VIEWS ON RESTRICTIVE MEASURES AMONG BRAZILIAN LAWYERS DURING THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK: AN EX-PLORATORY ANALYSIS FROM RAPID RESEARCH |
spellingShingle |
VIEWS ON RESTRICTIVE MEASURES AMONG BRAZILIAN LAWYERS DURING THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK: AN EX-PLORATORY ANALYSIS FROM RAPID RESEARCH de Sá e Silva, Fabio legal professionals COVID-19 empirical research public health profissionais do direito COVID-19 pesquisa empírica saúde pública |
title_short |
VIEWS ON RESTRICTIVE MEASURES AMONG BRAZILIAN LAWYERS DURING THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK: AN EX-PLORATORY ANALYSIS FROM RAPID RESEARCH |
title_full |
VIEWS ON RESTRICTIVE MEASURES AMONG BRAZILIAN LAWYERS DURING THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK: AN EX-PLORATORY ANALYSIS FROM RAPID RESEARCH |
title_fullStr |
VIEWS ON RESTRICTIVE MEASURES AMONG BRAZILIAN LAWYERS DURING THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK: AN EX-PLORATORY ANALYSIS FROM RAPID RESEARCH |
title_full_unstemmed |
VIEWS ON RESTRICTIVE MEASURES AMONG BRAZILIAN LAWYERS DURING THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK: AN EX-PLORATORY ANALYSIS FROM RAPID RESEARCH |
title_sort |
VIEWS ON RESTRICTIVE MEASURES AMONG BRAZILIAN LAWYERS DURING THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK: AN EX-PLORATORY ANALYSIS FROM RAPID RESEARCH |
author |
de Sá e Silva, Fabio |
author_facet |
de Sá e Silva, Fabio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Sá e Silva, Fabio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
legal professionals COVID-19 empirical research public health profissionais do direito COVID-19 pesquisa empírica saúde pública |
topic |
legal professionals COVID-19 empirical research public health profissionais do direito COVID-19 pesquisa empírica saúde pública |
description |
COVID-19 has had deep impacts on the lives of individuals, organizations, and polities around the globe. Legal professionals and institutions were not absent from this story. Governments adopted different approaches to deal with the pandemic, which – at a time when social relations have become ever more judicialized – inevitably triggered legal disputes. Central to these disputes were restrictive measures such as lockdown for non-essential businesses, shelter-in-place and stay-at-home orders for communities, and compulsory quarantine for infected individuals. These disputes were further entangled with political conflict and polarization, as the case of Brazil under President Jair Bolsonaro well exemplifies. Against such backdrop, this article investigates: Did Brazilian legal professionals view those restrictive measures and the power of government entities to enact them to be consistent with ‘the law’? What explains variation in their views? By exploring data from rapid research carried out during the pandemic outbreak in Brazil, this article points to the role of variables such as pandemic understandings and experiences, political orientation and attitudes, and the nexus between legal knowledge and the State in shaping the attitude of such population. The implications to studies on legal professionals, pandemics, and the rule of law in Brazil and beyond are discussed. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/642 10.19092/reed.v10.642 |
url |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/642 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19092/reed.v10.642 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://reedrevista.org/reed/article/view/642/367 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Rede de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies; Vol. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-63 Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; v. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito; 1-63 2319-0817 10.19092/reed.v9 reponame:Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito instname:Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) instacron:RPED |
instname_str |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
instacron_str |
RPED |
institution |
RPED |
reponame_str |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
collection |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito - Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito (REED) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mvchein@gmail.com||reed.revista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799138702497153024 |