Accuracy of a smartphone to test laryngoscope's light and an audit to our laryngoscopes using an ISO standard
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000200180 |
Resumo: | Abstract Background and objectives: Laryngoscope is a key tool in anesthetic practice. Direct laryngoscopy is a crucial moment and inadequate laryngoscope's light can lead to catastrophic consequences. From our experience laryngoscope's light is assessed in a subjective manner and we believe a more precise evaluation should be used. Our objective is to compare the accuracy of a smartphone compared to a lux meter. Secondly we audited our Operating Room laryngoscopes. Methods: We designed a pragmatic study, using as primary outcome the accuracy of a smartphone compared to the lux meter. Further we audited with both the lux meter and the smartphone all laryngoscopes and blades ready to use in our Operating Rooms, using the International Standard form the International Organization for Standardization. Results: For primary outcome we found no significant difference between devices. Our audit showed that only 2 in 48 laryngoscopes complied with the ISO norm. When comparing the measurements between the lux meter and the smartphone we found no significant difference. Discussion: Ideally every laryngoscope should perform as required. We believe all laryngoscopes should have a practical but reliable and objective test prior to its utilization. Our results suggest the smartphone was accurate enough to be used as a lux meter to test laryngoscope's light. Audit results showing only 4% comply with the ISO standard are consistent with other studies. Conclusion: The tested smartphone has enough accuracy to perform light measurement in laryngoscopes. We believe this is a step further to perform an objective routine check to laryngoscope's light. |
id |
SBA-1_2f83481098699f8cc0e92f651ba48462 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-70942017000200180 |
network_acronym_str |
SBA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Accuracy of a smartphone to test laryngoscope's light and an audit to our laryngoscopes using an ISO standardLaryngoscopeLaryngoscopyLightAccuracySmartphoneLux meterAbstract Background and objectives: Laryngoscope is a key tool in anesthetic practice. Direct laryngoscopy is a crucial moment and inadequate laryngoscope's light can lead to catastrophic consequences. From our experience laryngoscope's light is assessed in a subjective manner and we believe a more precise evaluation should be used. Our objective is to compare the accuracy of a smartphone compared to a lux meter. Secondly we audited our Operating Room laryngoscopes. Methods: We designed a pragmatic study, using as primary outcome the accuracy of a smartphone compared to the lux meter. Further we audited with both the lux meter and the smartphone all laryngoscopes and blades ready to use in our Operating Rooms, using the International Standard form the International Organization for Standardization. Results: For primary outcome we found no significant difference between devices. Our audit showed that only 2 in 48 laryngoscopes complied with the ISO norm. When comparing the measurements between the lux meter and the smartphone we found no significant difference. Discussion: Ideally every laryngoscope should perform as required. We believe all laryngoscopes should have a practical but reliable and objective test prior to its utilization. Our results suggest the smartphone was accurate enough to be used as a lux meter to test laryngoscope's light. Audit results showing only 4% comply with the ISO standard are consistent with other studies. Conclusion: The tested smartphone has enough accuracy to perform light measurement in laryngoscopes. We believe this is a step further to perform an objective routine check to laryngoscope's light.Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia2017-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000200180Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.67 n.2 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)instacron:SBA10.1016/j.bjane.2016.07.007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMachado,Diogo Alcino de Abreu Ribeiro CarvalhoEsteves,Dina da Assunção AzevedoBranca,Pedro Manuel Araújo de Sousaeng2017-03-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-70942017000200180Revistahttps://www.sbahq.org/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sba2000@openlink.com.br1806-907X0034-7094opendoar:2017-03-22T00:00Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Accuracy of a smartphone to test laryngoscope's light and an audit to our laryngoscopes using an ISO standard |
title |
Accuracy of a smartphone to test laryngoscope's light and an audit to our laryngoscopes using an ISO standard |
spellingShingle |
Accuracy of a smartphone to test laryngoscope's light and an audit to our laryngoscopes using an ISO standard Machado,Diogo Alcino de Abreu Ribeiro Carvalho Laryngoscope Laryngoscopy Light Accuracy Smartphone Lux meter |
title_short |
Accuracy of a smartphone to test laryngoscope's light and an audit to our laryngoscopes using an ISO standard |
title_full |
Accuracy of a smartphone to test laryngoscope's light and an audit to our laryngoscopes using an ISO standard |
title_fullStr |
Accuracy of a smartphone to test laryngoscope's light and an audit to our laryngoscopes using an ISO standard |
title_full_unstemmed |
Accuracy of a smartphone to test laryngoscope's light and an audit to our laryngoscopes using an ISO standard |
title_sort |
Accuracy of a smartphone to test laryngoscope's light and an audit to our laryngoscopes using an ISO standard |
author |
Machado,Diogo Alcino de Abreu Ribeiro Carvalho |
author_facet |
Machado,Diogo Alcino de Abreu Ribeiro Carvalho Esteves,Dina da Assunção Azevedo Branca,Pedro Manuel Araújo de Sousa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Esteves,Dina da Assunção Azevedo Branca,Pedro Manuel Araújo de Sousa |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Machado,Diogo Alcino de Abreu Ribeiro Carvalho Esteves,Dina da Assunção Azevedo Branca,Pedro Manuel Araújo de Sousa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Laryngoscope Laryngoscopy Light Accuracy Smartphone Lux meter |
topic |
Laryngoscope Laryngoscopy Light Accuracy Smartphone Lux meter |
description |
Abstract Background and objectives: Laryngoscope is a key tool in anesthetic practice. Direct laryngoscopy is a crucial moment and inadequate laryngoscope's light can lead to catastrophic consequences. From our experience laryngoscope's light is assessed in a subjective manner and we believe a more precise evaluation should be used. Our objective is to compare the accuracy of a smartphone compared to a lux meter. Secondly we audited our Operating Room laryngoscopes. Methods: We designed a pragmatic study, using as primary outcome the accuracy of a smartphone compared to the lux meter. Further we audited with both the lux meter and the smartphone all laryngoscopes and blades ready to use in our Operating Rooms, using the International Standard form the International Organization for Standardization. Results: For primary outcome we found no significant difference between devices. Our audit showed that only 2 in 48 laryngoscopes complied with the ISO norm. When comparing the measurements between the lux meter and the smartphone we found no significant difference. Discussion: Ideally every laryngoscope should perform as required. We believe all laryngoscopes should have a practical but reliable and objective test prior to its utilization. Our results suggest the smartphone was accurate enough to be used as a lux meter to test laryngoscope's light. Audit results showing only 4% comply with the ISO standard are consistent with other studies. Conclusion: The tested smartphone has enough accuracy to perform light measurement in laryngoscopes. We believe this is a step further to perform an objective routine check to laryngoscope's light. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000200180 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000200180 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.bjane.2016.07.007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.67 n.2 2017 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) instacron:SBA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) |
instacron_str |
SBA |
institution |
SBA |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sba2000@openlink.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126629104058368 |