Difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: observational study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade,Rebeca Gonelli Albanez da Cunha
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Lima,Bruno Luís Soares, Lopes,Douglas Kaíque de Oliveira, Couceiro Filho,Roberto Oliveira, Lima,Luciana Cavalcanti, Couceiro,Tania Cursino de Menezes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942018000200168
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: Since anesthesia complications associated with unexpected difficult airway are potentially catastrophic, they should be avoided. The modified Mallampati test and jaw-thrust maneuver enable the identification of difficult airway. The aim of this study was to associate the modified Mallampati test and the jaw-thrust maneuver with laryngoscopy (Cormack–Lehane) in an attempt to identify a better predictor of difficult airway in an adult population undergoing elective surgery. Method: A cross-sectional study in which 133 adult patients undergoing elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation were analyzed. The accuracy and specificity of the modified Mallampati test and jaw-thrust maneuver were assessed by correlating them with difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack–Lehane Degrees 3 and 4). Results: In the 133 patients evaluated the difficult intubation rate found was 0.8%; there was association between the two predictive tests proposed (p = 0.012). The values of 94.5% for specificity and 95.4% for accuracy were found for the jaw-thrust maneuver and for the modified Mallampati test, the values found were 81.1% and 81.2%, respectively. Kappa agreement identified a result of 0.240 between jaw-thrust maneuver and Cormack–Lehane, which was considered reasonable. On the other hand, a poor agreement (κ = 0.06) was seen between modified Mallampati test and Cormack–Lehane test. Conclusion: The jaw-thrust maneuver presented superior accuracy and agreement than the modified Mallampati test, showing the ability to identify a difficult airway. It is necessary to emphasize the association of tests in the evaluation of patients, emphasizing their complementarity to minimize the negative consequences of repeated laryngoscopies.
id SBA-1_470e324792420e1b6a8414d1077182c8
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-70942018000200168
network_acronym_str SBA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: observational studyDifficult airwayAirwayIntubationLaryngoscopyMallampati testJaw-thrust maneuverAbstract Introduction: Since anesthesia complications associated with unexpected difficult airway are potentially catastrophic, they should be avoided. The modified Mallampati test and jaw-thrust maneuver enable the identification of difficult airway. The aim of this study was to associate the modified Mallampati test and the jaw-thrust maneuver with laryngoscopy (Cormack–Lehane) in an attempt to identify a better predictor of difficult airway in an adult population undergoing elective surgery. Method: A cross-sectional study in which 133 adult patients undergoing elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation were analyzed. The accuracy and specificity of the modified Mallampati test and jaw-thrust maneuver were assessed by correlating them with difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack–Lehane Degrees 3 and 4). Results: In the 133 patients evaluated the difficult intubation rate found was 0.8%; there was association between the two predictive tests proposed (p = 0.012). The values of 94.5% for specificity and 95.4% for accuracy were found for the jaw-thrust maneuver and for the modified Mallampati test, the values found were 81.1% and 81.2%, respectively. Kappa agreement identified a result of 0.240 between jaw-thrust maneuver and Cormack–Lehane, which was considered reasonable. On the other hand, a poor agreement (κ = 0.06) was seen between modified Mallampati test and Cormack–Lehane test. Conclusion: The jaw-thrust maneuver presented superior accuracy and agreement than the modified Mallampati test, showing the ability to identify a difficult airway. It is necessary to emphasize the association of tests in the evaluation of patients, emphasizing their complementarity to minimize the negative consequences of repeated laryngoscopies.Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia2018-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942018000200168Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.68 n.2 2018reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)instacron:SBA10.1016/j.bjane.2017.10.010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade,Rebeca Gonelli Albanez da CunhaLima,Bruno Luís SoaresLopes,Douglas Kaíque de OliveiraCouceiro Filho,Roberto OliveiraLima,Luciana CavalcantiCouceiro,Tania Cursino de Menezeseng2018-04-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-70942018000200168Revistahttps://www.sbahq.org/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sba2000@openlink.com.br1806-907X0034-7094opendoar:2018-04-17T00:00Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: observational study
title Difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: observational study
spellingShingle Difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: observational study
Andrade,Rebeca Gonelli Albanez da Cunha
Difficult airway
Airway
Intubation
Laryngoscopy
Mallampati test
Jaw-thrust maneuver
title_short Difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: observational study
title_full Difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: observational study
title_fullStr Difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: observational study
title_full_unstemmed Difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: observational study
title_sort Difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: observational study
author Andrade,Rebeca Gonelli Albanez da Cunha
author_facet Andrade,Rebeca Gonelli Albanez da Cunha
Lima,Bruno Luís Soares
Lopes,Douglas Kaíque de Oliveira
Couceiro Filho,Roberto Oliveira
Lima,Luciana Cavalcanti
Couceiro,Tania Cursino de Menezes
author_role author
author2 Lima,Bruno Luís Soares
Lopes,Douglas Kaíque de Oliveira
Couceiro Filho,Roberto Oliveira
Lima,Luciana Cavalcanti
Couceiro,Tania Cursino de Menezes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade,Rebeca Gonelli Albanez da Cunha
Lima,Bruno Luís Soares
Lopes,Douglas Kaíque de Oliveira
Couceiro Filho,Roberto Oliveira
Lima,Luciana Cavalcanti
Couceiro,Tania Cursino de Menezes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Difficult airway
Airway
Intubation
Laryngoscopy
Mallampati test
Jaw-thrust maneuver
topic Difficult airway
Airway
Intubation
Laryngoscopy
Mallampati test
Jaw-thrust maneuver
description Abstract Introduction: Since anesthesia complications associated with unexpected difficult airway are potentially catastrophic, they should be avoided. The modified Mallampati test and jaw-thrust maneuver enable the identification of difficult airway. The aim of this study was to associate the modified Mallampati test and the jaw-thrust maneuver with laryngoscopy (Cormack–Lehane) in an attempt to identify a better predictor of difficult airway in an adult population undergoing elective surgery. Method: A cross-sectional study in which 133 adult patients undergoing elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation were analyzed. The accuracy and specificity of the modified Mallampati test and jaw-thrust maneuver were assessed by correlating them with difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack–Lehane Degrees 3 and 4). Results: In the 133 patients evaluated the difficult intubation rate found was 0.8%; there was association between the two predictive tests proposed (p = 0.012). The values of 94.5% for specificity and 95.4% for accuracy were found for the jaw-thrust maneuver and for the modified Mallampati test, the values found were 81.1% and 81.2%, respectively. Kappa agreement identified a result of 0.240 between jaw-thrust maneuver and Cormack–Lehane, which was considered reasonable. On the other hand, a poor agreement (κ = 0.06) was seen between modified Mallampati test and Cormack–Lehane test. Conclusion: The jaw-thrust maneuver presented superior accuracy and agreement than the modified Mallampati test, showing the ability to identify a difficult airway. It is necessary to emphasize the association of tests in the evaluation of patients, emphasizing their complementarity to minimize the negative consequences of repeated laryngoscopies.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942018000200168
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942018000200168
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjane.2017.10.010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.68 n.2 2018
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron:SBA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron_str SBA
institution SBA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sba2000@openlink.com.br
_version_ 1752126629597937664