Dificuldade na laringoscopia e na intubação orotraqueal: estudo observacional

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade, Rebeca Gonelli Albanez da Cunha
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Lima, Bruno Luís Soares, Lopes, Douglas Kaíque de Oliveira, Couceiro Filho, Roberto Oliveira, Lima, Luciana Cavalcanti [UNESP], Couceiro, Tania Cursino de Menezes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2017.10.009
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170411
Resumo: Introduction: Since anesthesia complications associated with unexpected difficult airway are potentially catastrophic, they should be avoided. The modified Mallampati test and jaw‐thrust maneuver enable the identification of difficult airway. The aim of this study was to associate the modified Mallampati test and the jaw‐thrust maneuver with laryngoscopy (Cormack‐Lehane) in an attempt to identify a better predictor of difficult airway in an adult population undergoing elective surgery. Method: A cross‐sectional study in which 133 adult patients undergoing elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation were analyzed. The accuracy and specificity of the modified Mallampati test and jaw‐thrust maneuver were assessed by correlating them with difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack‐Lehane Degrees 3 and 4). Results: In the 133 patients evaluated the difficult intubation rate found was 0.8%; there was association between the two predictive tests proposed (p = 0.012). The values of 94.5% for specificity and 95.4% for accuracy were found for the jaw‐thrust maneuver and for the modified Mallampati test, the values found were 81.1% and 81.2%, respectively. Kappa agreement identified a result of 0.240 between jaw‐thrust maneuver and Cormarck‐Lehane, which was considered reasonable. On the other hand, a poor agreement (κ = 0.06) was seen between modified Mallampati test and Cormarck‐Lehane test. Conclusion: The jaw‐thrust maneuver presented superior accuracy and agreement than the modified Mallampati test, showing the ability to identify a difficult airway. It is necessary to emphasize the association of tests in the evaluation of patients, emphasizing their complementarity to minimize the negative consequences of repeated laryngoscopies.
id UNSP_b9974bce42c0e04e6c911087cef9e108
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170411
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Dificuldade na laringoscopia e na intubação orotraqueal: estudo observacionalDifficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: observational studyAirwayDifficult airwayIntubationJaw‐thrust maneuverLaryngoscopyMallampati testIntroduction: Since anesthesia complications associated with unexpected difficult airway are potentially catastrophic, they should be avoided. The modified Mallampati test and jaw‐thrust maneuver enable the identification of difficult airway. The aim of this study was to associate the modified Mallampati test and the jaw‐thrust maneuver with laryngoscopy (Cormack‐Lehane) in an attempt to identify a better predictor of difficult airway in an adult population undergoing elective surgery. Method: A cross‐sectional study in which 133 adult patients undergoing elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation were analyzed. The accuracy and specificity of the modified Mallampati test and jaw‐thrust maneuver were assessed by correlating them with difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack‐Lehane Degrees 3 and 4). Results: In the 133 patients evaluated the difficult intubation rate found was 0.8%; there was association between the two predictive tests proposed (p = 0.012). The values of 94.5% for specificity and 95.4% for accuracy were found for the jaw‐thrust maneuver and for the modified Mallampati test, the values found were 81.1% and 81.2%, respectively. Kappa agreement identified a result of 0.240 between jaw‐thrust maneuver and Cormarck‐Lehane, which was considered reasonable. On the other hand, a poor agreement (κ = 0.06) was seen between modified Mallampati test and Cormarck‐Lehane test. Conclusion: The jaw‐thrust maneuver presented superior accuracy and agreement than the modified Mallampati test, showing the ability to identify a difficult airway. It is necessary to emphasize the association of tests in the evaluation of patients, emphasizing their complementarity to minimize the negative consequences of repeated laryngoscopies.Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP) AnestesiologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (Unesp) AnestesiologiaUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) Neuropsiquiatria e Ciência do ComportamentoHospital Barão de LucenaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (Unesp) AnestesiologiaAnestesiologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)Hospital Barão de LucenaAndrade, Rebeca Gonelli Albanez da CunhaLima, Bruno Luís SoaresLopes, Douglas Kaíque de OliveiraCouceiro Filho, Roberto OliveiraLima, Luciana Cavalcanti [UNESP]Couceiro, Tania Cursino de Menezes2018-12-11T16:50:41Z2018-12-11T16:50:41Z2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article168-173application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2017.10.009Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology, v. 68, n. 2, p. 168-173, 2018.1806-907X0034-7094http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17041110.1016/j.bjan.2017.10.0092-s2.0-850348283872-s2.0-85034828387.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengporBrazilian Journal of Anesthesiology0,320info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-13T06:32:46Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/170411Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:50:42.555486Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dificuldade na laringoscopia e na intubação orotraqueal: estudo observacional
Difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: observational study
title Dificuldade na laringoscopia e na intubação orotraqueal: estudo observacional
spellingShingle Dificuldade na laringoscopia e na intubação orotraqueal: estudo observacional
Andrade, Rebeca Gonelli Albanez da Cunha
Airway
Difficult airway
Intubation
Jaw‐thrust maneuver
Laryngoscopy
Mallampati test
title_short Dificuldade na laringoscopia e na intubação orotraqueal: estudo observacional
title_full Dificuldade na laringoscopia e na intubação orotraqueal: estudo observacional
title_fullStr Dificuldade na laringoscopia e na intubação orotraqueal: estudo observacional
title_full_unstemmed Dificuldade na laringoscopia e na intubação orotraqueal: estudo observacional
title_sort Dificuldade na laringoscopia e na intubação orotraqueal: estudo observacional
author Andrade, Rebeca Gonelli Albanez da Cunha
author_facet Andrade, Rebeca Gonelli Albanez da Cunha
Lima, Bruno Luís Soares
Lopes, Douglas Kaíque de Oliveira
Couceiro Filho, Roberto Oliveira
Lima, Luciana Cavalcanti [UNESP]
Couceiro, Tania Cursino de Menezes
author_role author
author2 Lima, Bruno Luís Soares
Lopes, Douglas Kaíque de Oliveira
Couceiro Filho, Roberto Oliveira
Lima, Luciana Cavalcanti [UNESP]
Couceiro, Tania Cursino de Menezes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Anestesiologia
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)
Hospital Barão de Lucena
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade, Rebeca Gonelli Albanez da Cunha
Lima, Bruno Luís Soares
Lopes, Douglas Kaíque de Oliveira
Couceiro Filho, Roberto Oliveira
Lima, Luciana Cavalcanti [UNESP]
Couceiro, Tania Cursino de Menezes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Airway
Difficult airway
Intubation
Jaw‐thrust maneuver
Laryngoscopy
Mallampati test
topic Airway
Difficult airway
Intubation
Jaw‐thrust maneuver
Laryngoscopy
Mallampati test
description Introduction: Since anesthesia complications associated with unexpected difficult airway are potentially catastrophic, they should be avoided. The modified Mallampati test and jaw‐thrust maneuver enable the identification of difficult airway. The aim of this study was to associate the modified Mallampati test and the jaw‐thrust maneuver with laryngoscopy (Cormack‐Lehane) in an attempt to identify a better predictor of difficult airway in an adult population undergoing elective surgery. Method: A cross‐sectional study in which 133 adult patients undergoing elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation were analyzed. The accuracy and specificity of the modified Mallampati test and jaw‐thrust maneuver were assessed by correlating them with difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack‐Lehane Degrees 3 and 4). Results: In the 133 patients evaluated the difficult intubation rate found was 0.8%; there was association between the two predictive tests proposed (p = 0.012). The values of 94.5% for specificity and 95.4% for accuracy were found for the jaw‐thrust maneuver and for the modified Mallampati test, the values found were 81.1% and 81.2%, respectively. Kappa agreement identified a result of 0.240 between jaw‐thrust maneuver and Cormarck‐Lehane, which was considered reasonable. On the other hand, a poor agreement (κ = 0.06) was seen between modified Mallampati test and Cormarck‐Lehane test. Conclusion: The jaw‐thrust maneuver presented superior accuracy and agreement than the modified Mallampati test, showing the ability to identify a difficult airway. It is necessary to emphasize the association of tests in the evaluation of patients, emphasizing their complementarity to minimize the negative consequences of repeated laryngoscopies.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T16:50:41Z
2018-12-11T16:50:41Z
2018-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2017.10.009
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology, v. 68, n. 2, p. 168-173, 2018.
1806-907X
0034-7094
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170411
10.1016/j.bjan.2017.10.009
2-s2.0-85034828387
2-s2.0-85034828387.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2017.10.009
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/170411
identifier_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology, v. 68, n. 2, p. 168-173, 2018.
1806-907X
0034-7094
10.1016/j.bjan.2017.10.009
2-s2.0-85034828387
2-s2.0-85034828387.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
0,320
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 168-173
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129467812413440