Use of neuromuscular blockers in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Locks,Giovani de Figueiredo
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Cavalcanti,Ismar Lima, Duarte,Nadia Maria Conceição, Cunha,Rafael Martins da, Almeida,Maria Cristina Simões de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942015000500319
Resumo: ABSTRACTThe objective of this study was to evaluate how Brazilian anesthesiologists are using neuromuscular blockers, focusing on how they establish the diagnosis of postoperative residual curarization and the incidence of complications associated with the use of neuromuscular blockers. A questionnaire was sent to anesthesiologists inviting them to participate in the study. The online data collection remained open from March 2012 to June 2013. During the study period, 1296 responses were collected. Rocuronium, atracurium, and cisatracurium were the main neuromuscular blockers used in cases of elective surgery. Succinylcholine and rocuronium were the main neuromuscular blockers used in cases of emergency surgery. Less than 15% of anesthesiologists reported the frequent use of neuromuscular function monitors. Only 18% of those involved in the study reported that all workplaces have such a monitor. Most respondents reported using only the clinical criteria to assess whether the patient is recovered from the muscle relaxant. Most respondents also reported always using some form of neuromuscular blockade reversal. The major complications attributed to neuromuscular blockers were residual curarization and prolonged blockade. Eighteen anesthesiologists reported death attributed to neuromuscular blockers. Residual or prolonged blockade is possibly recorded as a result of the high rate of using clinical criteria to diagnose whether the patient has recovered or not from motor block and, as a corollary, the poor use of neuromuscular transmission monitors in daily practice.
id SBA-1_5d5814230d7210c7c731642b201c1129
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-70942015000500319
network_acronym_str SBA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Use of neuromuscular blockers in BrazilNeuromuscular blockersResearch on health servicesNeuromuscular monitoringABSTRACTThe objective of this study was to evaluate how Brazilian anesthesiologists are using neuromuscular blockers, focusing on how they establish the diagnosis of postoperative residual curarization and the incidence of complications associated with the use of neuromuscular blockers. A questionnaire was sent to anesthesiologists inviting them to participate in the study. The online data collection remained open from March 2012 to June 2013. During the study period, 1296 responses were collected. Rocuronium, atracurium, and cisatracurium were the main neuromuscular blockers used in cases of elective surgery. Succinylcholine and rocuronium were the main neuromuscular blockers used in cases of emergency surgery. Less than 15% of anesthesiologists reported the frequent use of neuromuscular function monitors. Only 18% of those involved in the study reported that all workplaces have such a monitor. Most respondents reported using only the clinical criteria to assess whether the patient is recovered from the muscle relaxant. Most respondents also reported always using some form of neuromuscular blockade reversal. The major complications attributed to neuromuscular blockers were residual curarization and prolonged blockade. Eighteen anesthesiologists reported death attributed to neuromuscular blockers. Residual or prolonged blockade is possibly recorded as a result of the high rate of using clinical criteria to diagnose whether the patient has recovered or not from motor block and, as a corollary, the poor use of neuromuscular transmission monitors in daily practice.Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia2015-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942015000500319Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.65 n.5 2015reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)instacron:SBA10.1016/j.bjane.2015.03.001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLocks,Giovani de FigueiredoCavalcanti,Ismar LimaDuarte,Nadia Maria ConceiçãoCunha,Rafael Martins daAlmeida,Maria Cristina Simões deeng2015-10-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-70942015000500319Revistahttps://www.sbahq.org/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sba2000@openlink.com.br1806-907X0034-7094opendoar:2015-10-20T00:00Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of neuromuscular blockers in Brazil
title Use of neuromuscular blockers in Brazil
spellingShingle Use of neuromuscular blockers in Brazil
Locks,Giovani de Figueiredo
Neuromuscular blockers
Research on health services
Neuromuscular monitoring
title_short Use of neuromuscular blockers in Brazil
title_full Use of neuromuscular blockers in Brazil
title_fullStr Use of neuromuscular blockers in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Use of neuromuscular blockers in Brazil
title_sort Use of neuromuscular blockers in Brazil
author Locks,Giovani de Figueiredo
author_facet Locks,Giovani de Figueiredo
Cavalcanti,Ismar Lima
Duarte,Nadia Maria Conceição
Cunha,Rafael Martins da
Almeida,Maria Cristina Simões de
author_role author
author2 Cavalcanti,Ismar Lima
Duarte,Nadia Maria Conceição
Cunha,Rafael Martins da
Almeida,Maria Cristina Simões de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Locks,Giovani de Figueiredo
Cavalcanti,Ismar Lima
Duarte,Nadia Maria Conceição
Cunha,Rafael Martins da
Almeida,Maria Cristina Simões de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Neuromuscular blockers
Research on health services
Neuromuscular monitoring
topic Neuromuscular blockers
Research on health services
Neuromuscular monitoring
description ABSTRACTThe objective of this study was to evaluate how Brazilian anesthesiologists are using neuromuscular blockers, focusing on how they establish the diagnosis of postoperative residual curarization and the incidence of complications associated with the use of neuromuscular blockers. A questionnaire was sent to anesthesiologists inviting them to participate in the study. The online data collection remained open from March 2012 to June 2013. During the study period, 1296 responses were collected. Rocuronium, atracurium, and cisatracurium were the main neuromuscular blockers used in cases of elective surgery. Succinylcholine and rocuronium were the main neuromuscular blockers used in cases of emergency surgery. Less than 15% of anesthesiologists reported the frequent use of neuromuscular function monitors. Only 18% of those involved in the study reported that all workplaces have such a monitor. Most respondents reported using only the clinical criteria to assess whether the patient is recovered from the muscle relaxant. Most respondents also reported always using some form of neuromuscular blockade reversal. The major complications attributed to neuromuscular blockers were residual curarization and prolonged blockade. Eighteen anesthesiologists reported death attributed to neuromuscular blockers. Residual or prolonged blockade is possibly recorded as a result of the high rate of using clinical criteria to diagnose whether the patient has recovered or not from motor block and, as a corollary, the poor use of neuromuscular transmission monitors in daily practice.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942015000500319
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942015000500319
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjane.2015.03.001
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.65 n.5 2015
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron:SBA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron_str SBA
institution SBA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sba2000@openlink.com.br
_version_ 1752126628539924480