Effect of intravenous acetaminophen versus fentanyl on postoperative pain after transurethral lithotripsy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942019000200131 |
Resumo: | Abstract Background: Postoperative pain is the most common postoperative complication. This study was conducted to assess the effect of acetaminophen versus fentanyl on postoperative pain relief in patients who underwent urologic surgeries. Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on patients aged 18–65 years. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 2000 mg acetaminophen (propacetamol) or 2 mcg.kg-1 fentanyl intravenously, 15 min before the end of surgery. The postoperative pain was evaluated every 6 h for 24 h using the Visual Analog Scale. Total morphine dose taken in 24 h and hemodynamic status were evaluated. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled into the trial. The mean score of pain in 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after surgery was lower in the acetaminophen group than in the fentanyl group but the difference was not statistically significant except in 12 and 18 h after surgery (p < 0.05). The amount of administered morphine was higher in the fentanyl group than in the acetaminophen group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The hemodynamic status including systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rates were nearly the same in the two groups but the SpO2 mean was significantly higher in the acetaminophen group than the fentanyl group. Conclusions: This trial indicated that intravenous acetaminophen is as effective as intravenous fentanyl in pain relief after urologic surgeries (transurethral lithotripsy). |
id |
SBA-1_5f4faa93d26d48419b24fd0d2397a3d2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-70942019000200131 |
network_acronym_str |
SBA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effect of intravenous acetaminophen versus fentanyl on postoperative pain after transurethral lithotripsyAcetaminophenFentanylMorphinePostoperative painHemodynamic parametersTransurethral lithotripsyAbstract Background: Postoperative pain is the most common postoperative complication. This study was conducted to assess the effect of acetaminophen versus fentanyl on postoperative pain relief in patients who underwent urologic surgeries. Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on patients aged 18–65 years. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 2000 mg acetaminophen (propacetamol) or 2 mcg.kg-1 fentanyl intravenously, 15 min before the end of surgery. The postoperative pain was evaluated every 6 h for 24 h using the Visual Analog Scale. Total morphine dose taken in 24 h and hemodynamic status were evaluated. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled into the trial. The mean score of pain in 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after surgery was lower in the acetaminophen group than in the fentanyl group but the difference was not statistically significant except in 12 and 18 h after surgery (p < 0.05). The amount of administered morphine was higher in the fentanyl group than in the acetaminophen group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The hemodynamic status including systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rates were nearly the same in the two groups but the SpO2 mean was significantly higher in the acetaminophen group than the fentanyl group. Conclusions: This trial indicated that intravenous acetaminophen is as effective as intravenous fentanyl in pain relief after urologic surgeries (transurethral lithotripsy).Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942019000200131Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.69 n.2 2019reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)instacron:SBA10.1016/j.bjane.2018.06.005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZolhavarieh,Seyed MohammadMousavi-Bahar,Seyed HabibollahMohseni,MaedeEmam,Amir HosseinPoorolajal,JalalMajzoubi,Faezeeng2019-04-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-70942019000200131Revistahttps://www.sbahq.org/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sba2000@openlink.com.br1806-907X0034-7094opendoar:2019-04-17T00:00Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of intravenous acetaminophen versus fentanyl on postoperative pain after transurethral lithotripsy |
title |
Effect of intravenous acetaminophen versus fentanyl on postoperative pain after transurethral lithotripsy |
spellingShingle |
Effect of intravenous acetaminophen versus fentanyl on postoperative pain after transurethral lithotripsy Zolhavarieh,Seyed Mohammad Acetaminophen Fentanyl Morphine Postoperative pain Hemodynamic parameters Transurethral lithotripsy |
title_short |
Effect of intravenous acetaminophen versus fentanyl on postoperative pain after transurethral lithotripsy |
title_full |
Effect of intravenous acetaminophen versus fentanyl on postoperative pain after transurethral lithotripsy |
title_fullStr |
Effect of intravenous acetaminophen versus fentanyl on postoperative pain after transurethral lithotripsy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of intravenous acetaminophen versus fentanyl on postoperative pain after transurethral lithotripsy |
title_sort |
Effect of intravenous acetaminophen versus fentanyl on postoperative pain after transurethral lithotripsy |
author |
Zolhavarieh,Seyed Mohammad |
author_facet |
Zolhavarieh,Seyed Mohammad Mousavi-Bahar,Seyed Habibollah Mohseni,Maede Emam,Amir Hossein Poorolajal,Jalal Majzoubi,Faeze |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mousavi-Bahar,Seyed Habibollah Mohseni,Maede Emam,Amir Hossein Poorolajal,Jalal Majzoubi,Faeze |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zolhavarieh,Seyed Mohammad Mousavi-Bahar,Seyed Habibollah Mohseni,Maede Emam,Amir Hossein Poorolajal,Jalal Majzoubi,Faeze |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acetaminophen Fentanyl Morphine Postoperative pain Hemodynamic parameters Transurethral lithotripsy |
topic |
Acetaminophen Fentanyl Morphine Postoperative pain Hemodynamic parameters Transurethral lithotripsy |
description |
Abstract Background: Postoperative pain is the most common postoperative complication. This study was conducted to assess the effect of acetaminophen versus fentanyl on postoperative pain relief in patients who underwent urologic surgeries. Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on patients aged 18–65 years. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 2000 mg acetaminophen (propacetamol) or 2 mcg.kg-1 fentanyl intravenously, 15 min before the end of surgery. The postoperative pain was evaluated every 6 h for 24 h using the Visual Analog Scale. Total morphine dose taken in 24 h and hemodynamic status were evaluated. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled into the trial. The mean score of pain in 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after surgery was lower in the acetaminophen group than in the fentanyl group but the difference was not statistically significant except in 12 and 18 h after surgery (p < 0.05). The amount of administered morphine was higher in the fentanyl group than in the acetaminophen group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The hemodynamic status including systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rates were nearly the same in the two groups but the SpO2 mean was significantly higher in the acetaminophen group than the fentanyl group. Conclusions: This trial indicated that intravenous acetaminophen is as effective as intravenous fentanyl in pain relief after urologic surgeries (transurethral lithotripsy). |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942019000200131 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942019000200131 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.bjane.2018.06.005 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.69 n.2 2019 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) instacron:SBA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) |
instacron_str |
SBA |
institution |
SBA |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sba2000@openlink.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126630154731520 |