Anesthesiologists' knowledge about packed red blood cells transfusion in surgical patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares,Joyce Mendes
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Queiroz,Athos Gabriel Vilela, Queiroz,Vaniely Kaliny Pinheiro de, Falbo,Ana Rodrigues, Silva,Marcelo Neves, Couceiro,Tania Cursino de Menezes, Lima,Luciana Cavalcanti
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000600584
Resumo: Abstract Introduction Blood is an important resource in several lifesaving interventions, such as anemia correction and improvement of oxygen transport capacity. Despite advances, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion still involves risks. The aim of this study was to describe the knowledge of anesthesiologists about the indications, adverse effects, and alternatives to red blood cell transfusion intraoperatively. Method Cross-sectional study using a questionnaire containing multiple choice questions and clinical cases related to relevant factors on the decision whether to perform PRBC transfusion, its adverse effects, hemoglobin triggers, preventive measures, and blood conservation strategies. The questionnaire was filled without the presence of the investigator. Likert scale was used and the average rank of responses was calculated. The Epi Info 7 software was used for data analysis. Results 79% of the institution's anesthesiologists answered the questionnaire; 100% identified the main adverse effects related to blood transfusion. When asked about the factors that influence the transfusion decision, hemoglobin level had the highest agreement (MR = 4.46) followed by heart disease (MR = 4.26); hematocrit (MR = 4.34); age (RM = 4.1) and microcirculation evaluation (MR = 4.22). Respondents (82.3%) identified levels of Hb = 6 g.dL-1 as a trigger to transfuse healthy patient. Regarding blood conservation strategies, hypervolemic hemodilution (MR = 2.81) and decided by drugs (MR = 2.95) were the least reported. Conclusion We identify a good understanding of anesthesiologists about PRBC transfusion; however, there is a need for refresher courses on the subject.
id SBA-1_e0d760ec7c2f8f4ced16b6112138e0fd
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-70942017000600584
network_acronym_str SBA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Anesthesiologists' knowledge about packed red blood cells transfusion in surgical patientsBlood transfusionAnesthesiologyKnowledgeRisksAdverse effectsAbstract Introduction Blood is an important resource in several lifesaving interventions, such as anemia correction and improvement of oxygen transport capacity. Despite advances, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion still involves risks. The aim of this study was to describe the knowledge of anesthesiologists about the indications, adverse effects, and alternatives to red blood cell transfusion intraoperatively. Method Cross-sectional study using a questionnaire containing multiple choice questions and clinical cases related to relevant factors on the decision whether to perform PRBC transfusion, its adverse effects, hemoglobin triggers, preventive measures, and blood conservation strategies. The questionnaire was filled without the presence of the investigator. Likert scale was used and the average rank of responses was calculated. The Epi Info 7 software was used for data analysis. Results 79% of the institution's anesthesiologists answered the questionnaire; 100% identified the main adverse effects related to blood transfusion. When asked about the factors that influence the transfusion decision, hemoglobin level had the highest agreement (MR = 4.46) followed by heart disease (MR = 4.26); hematocrit (MR = 4.34); age (RM = 4.1) and microcirculation evaluation (MR = 4.22). Respondents (82.3%) identified levels of Hb = 6 g.dL-1 as a trigger to transfuse healthy patient. Regarding blood conservation strategies, hypervolemic hemodilution (MR = 2.81) and decided by drugs (MR = 2.95) were the least reported. Conclusion We identify a good understanding of anesthesiologists about PRBC transfusion; however, there is a need for refresher courses on the subject.Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia2017-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000600584Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.67 n.6 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)instacron:SBA10.1016/j.bjane.2016.09.005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares,Joyce MendesQueiroz,Athos Gabriel VilelaQueiroz,Vaniely Kaliny Pinheiro deFalbo,Ana RodriguesSilva,Marcelo NevesCouceiro,Tania Cursino de MenezesLima,Luciana Cavalcantieng2017-11-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-70942017000600584Revistahttps://www.sbahq.org/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sba2000@openlink.com.br1806-907X0034-7094opendoar:2017-11-29T00:00Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Anesthesiologists' knowledge about packed red blood cells transfusion in surgical patients
title Anesthesiologists' knowledge about packed red blood cells transfusion in surgical patients
spellingShingle Anesthesiologists' knowledge about packed red blood cells transfusion in surgical patients
Soares,Joyce Mendes
Blood transfusion
Anesthesiology
Knowledge
Risks
Adverse effects
title_short Anesthesiologists' knowledge about packed red blood cells transfusion in surgical patients
title_full Anesthesiologists' knowledge about packed red blood cells transfusion in surgical patients
title_fullStr Anesthesiologists' knowledge about packed red blood cells transfusion in surgical patients
title_full_unstemmed Anesthesiologists' knowledge about packed red blood cells transfusion in surgical patients
title_sort Anesthesiologists' knowledge about packed red blood cells transfusion in surgical patients
author Soares,Joyce Mendes
author_facet Soares,Joyce Mendes
Queiroz,Athos Gabriel Vilela
Queiroz,Vaniely Kaliny Pinheiro de
Falbo,Ana Rodrigues
Silva,Marcelo Neves
Couceiro,Tania Cursino de Menezes
Lima,Luciana Cavalcanti
author_role author
author2 Queiroz,Athos Gabriel Vilela
Queiroz,Vaniely Kaliny Pinheiro de
Falbo,Ana Rodrigues
Silva,Marcelo Neves
Couceiro,Tania Cursino de Menezes
Lima,Luciana Cavalcanti
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares,Joyce Mendes
Queiroz,Athos Gabriel Vilela
Queiroz,Vaniely Kaliny Pinheiro de
Falbo,Ana Rodrigues
Silva,Marcelo Neves
Couceiro,Tania Cursino de Menezes
Lima,Luciana Cavalcanti
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Blood transfusion
Anesthesiology
Knowledge
Risks
Adverse effects
topic Blood transfusion
Anesthesiology
Knowledge
Risks
Adverse effects
description Abstract Introduction Blood is an important resource in several lifesaving interventions, such as anemia correction and improvement of oxygen transport capacity. Despite advances, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion still involves risks. The aim of this study was to describe the knowledge of anesthesiologists about the indications, adverse effects, and alternatives to red blood cell transfusion intraoperatively. Method Cross-sectional study using a questionnaire containing multiple choice questions and clinical cases related to relevant factors on the decision whether to perform PRBC transfusion, its adverse effects, hemoglobin triggers, preventive measures, and blood conservation strategies. The questionnaire was filled without the presence of the investigator. Likert scale was used and the average rank of responses was calculated. The Epi Info 7 software was used for data analysis. Results 79% of the institution's anesthesiologists answered the questionnaire; 100% identified the main adverse effects related to blood transfusion. When asked about the factors that influence the transfusion decision, hemoglobin level had the highest agreement (MR = 4.46) followed by heart disease (MR = 4.26); hematocrit (MR = 4.34); age (RM = 4.1) and microcirculation evaluation (MR = 4.22). Respondents (82.3%) identified levels of Hb = 6 g.dL-1 as a trigger to transfuse healthy patient. Regarding blood conservation strategies, hypervolemic hemodilution (MR = 2.81) and decided by drugs (MR = 2.95) were the least reported. Conclusion We identify a good understanding of anesthesiologists about PRBC transfusion; however, there is a need for refresher courses on the subject.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000600584
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000600584
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjane.2016.09.005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.67 n.6 2017
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron:SBA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron_str SBA
institution SBA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sba2000@openlink.com.br
_version_ 1752126629531877376