Carotid artery stenting has similar outcomes in men and women
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-54492021000100307 |
Resumo: | Abstract Background The aim of carotid interventions is to prevent cerebrovascular events. Endovascular treatment (carotid-artery-stenting/CAS) has become established as an alternative to open surgery in some cases. Historically, female sex has been considered as a perioperative risk factor, however, there are few studies regarding this hypothesis when it comes to CAS. Objectives To analyze the CAS results in our center adjusted by sex. Methods A retrospective cohort study was designed, including patients with carotid atheromatosis operated at a single center from January 2016 to June 2019. Our objective was to compare cardiovascular risk, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and mortality, by sex. Follow-up rates of stent patency, restenosis, stroke, myocardial infarction, and death were reported. Results 71 interventions were performed in 50 men (70.42%) and 21 women (29.57%). Mean age was 70.50 ± 10.72 years for men and 73.62 ± 11.78 years for women. Cardiovascular risk factors did not differ significantly between sexes. Mean follow-up was 11.28 ± 11.28 months. There were no significant differences in neurological events during follow-up. No adverse cardiological events were detected at any time. Regarding the mortality rate, during medium-term follow up there were 2 neurological related deaths with no significant differences between sexes (p=0.8432). Neither sex had higher rated of restenosis during long term follow-up (5.63% vs. 1.41%, p = 0.9693) or reoperation (1.41% vs. 1.41%, p = 0.4971). All procedures remained patent (<50% restenosis). Conclusions Despite the limitations of our study, CAS is a therapeutic option that is as effective and safe in women as in men. No sex differences were observed. |
id |
SBACV-1_f9dfe80f8d548bff441566f22f5bb4f7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1677-54492021000100307 |
network_acronym_str |
SBACV-1 |
network_name_str |
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Carotid artery stenting has similar outcomes in men and womencarotid artery stenting-femalecomplicationsmortalityrestenosisAbstract Background The aim of carotid interventions is to prevent cerebrovascular events. Endovascular treatment (carotid-artery-stenting/CAS) has become established as an alternative to open surgery in some cases. Historically, female sex has been considered as a perioperative risk factor, however, there are few studies regarding this hypothesis when it comes to CAS. Objectives To analyze the CAS results in our center adjusted by sex. Methods A retrospective cohort study was designed, including patients with carotid atheromatosis operated at a single center from January 2016 to June 2019. Our objective was to compare cardiovascular risk, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and mortality, by sex. Follow-up rates of stent patency, restenosis, stroke, myocardial infarction, and death were reported. Results 71 interventions were performed in 50 men (70.42%) and 21 women (29.57%). Mean age was 70.50 ± 10.72 years for men and 73.62 ± 11.78 years for women. Cardiovascular risk factors did not differ significantly between sexes. Mean follow-up was 11.28 ± 11.28 months. There were no significant differences in neurological events during follow-up. No adverse cardiological events were detected at any time. Regarding the mortality rate, during medium-term follow up there were 2 neurological related deaths with no significant differences between sexes (p=0.8432). Neither sex had higher rated of restenosis during long term follow-up (5.63% vs. 1.41%, p = 0.9693) or reoperation (1.41% vs. 1.41%, p = 0.4971). All procedures remained patent (<50% restenosis). Conclusions Despite the limitations of our study, CAS is a therapeutic option that is as effective and safe in women as in men. No sex differences were observed.Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-54492021000100307Jornal Vascular Brasileiro v.20 2021reponame:Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)instacron:SBACV10.1590/1677-5449.200169info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAnsuategui,MarinaIbarra,GabrielaRomero,CarmenComanges,AlejandraGonzalez-Fajardo,Jose A.eng2021-05-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-54492021000100307Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jvbhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||secretaria@sbacv.org.br1677-73011677-5449opendoar:2021-05-27T00:00Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Carotid artery stenting has similar outcomes in men and women |
title |
Carotid artery stenting has similar outcomes in men and women |
spellingShingle |
Carotid artery stenting has similar outcomes in men and women Ansuategui,Marina carotid artery stenting-female complications mortality restenosis |
title_short |
Carotid artery stenting has similar outcomes in men and women |
title_full |
Carotid artery stenting has similar outcomes in men and women |
title_fullStr |
Carotid artery stenting has similar outcomes in men and women |
title_full_unstemmed |
Carotid artery stenting has similar outcomes in men and women |
title_sort |
Carotid artery stenting has similar outcomes in men and women |
author |
Ansuategui,Marina |
author_facet |
Ansuategui,Marina Ibarra,Gabriela Romero,Carmen Comanges,Alejandra Gonzalez-Fajardo,Jose A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ibarra,Gabriela Romero,Carmen Comanges,Alejandra Gonzalez-Fajardo,Jose A. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ansuategui,Marina Ibarra,Gabriela Romero,Carmen Comanges,Alejandra Gonzalez-Fajardo,Jose A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
carotid artery stenting-female complications mortality restenosis |
topic |
carotid artery stenting-female complications mortality restenosis |
description |
Abstract Background The aim of carotid interventions is to prevent cerebrovascular events. Endovascular treatment (carotid-artery-stenting/CAS) has become established as an alternative to open surgery in some cases. Historically, female sex has been considered as a perioperative risk factor, however, there are few studies regarding this hypothesis when it comes to CAS. Objectives To analyze the CAS results in our center adjusted by sex. Methods A retrospective cohort study was designed, including patients with carotid atheromatosis operated at a single center from January 2016 to June 2019. Our objective was to compare cardiovascular risk, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and mortality, by sex. Follow-up rates of stent patency, restenosis, stroke, myocardial infarction, and death were reported. Results 71 interventions were performed in 50 men (70.42%) and 21 women (29.57%). Mean age was 70.50 ± 10.72 years for men and 73.62 ± 11.78 years for women. Cardiovascular risk factors did not differ significantly between sexes. Mean follow-up was 11.28 ± 11.28 months. There were no significant differences in neurological events during follow-up. No adverse cardiological events were detected at any time. Regarding the mortality rate, during medium-term follow up there were 2 neurological related deaths with no significant differences between sexes (p=0.8432). Neither sex had higher rated of restenosis during long term follow-up (5.63% vs. 1.41%, p = 0.9693) or reoperation (1.41% vs. 1.41%, p = 0.4971). All procedures remained patent (<50% restenosis). Conclusions Despite the limitations of our study, CAS is a therapeutic option that is as effective and safe in women as in men. No sex differences were observed. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-54492021000100307 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-54492021000100307 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1677-5449.200169 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro v.20 2021 reponame:Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) instacron:SBACV |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) |
instacron_str |
SBACV |
institution |
SBACV |
reponame_str |
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online) |
collection |
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||secretaria@sbacv.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126648851890176 |