Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2015002300381 |
Resumo: | AbstractBackground:Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO2max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO2max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, affecting clinical decisions.Objective:To determine the error of estimate of VO2max in cycle ergometry in a population attending clinical exercise testing laboratories, and to propose sex-specific equations to minimize that error.Methods:This study assessed 1715 adults (18 to 91 years, 68% men) undertaking maximum CPX in a lower limbs cycle ergometer (LLCE) with ramp protocol. The percentage error (E%) between measured VO2max and that estimated from the modified ACSM equation (Lang et al. MSSE, 1992) was calculated. Then, estimation equations were developed: 1) for all the population tested (C-GENERAL); and 2) separately by sex (C-MEN and C-WOMEN).Results:Measured VO2max was higher in men than in WOMEN: -29.4 ± 10.5 and 24.2 ± 9.2 mL.(kg.min)-1 (p < 0.01). The equations for estimating VO2max [in mL.(kg.min)-1] were: C-GENERAL = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.483 + 7; C-MEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.791 + 7; and C-WOMEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 9.820 + 7. The E% for MEN was: -3.4 ± 13.4% (modified ACSM); 1.2 ± 13.2% (C-GENERAL); and -0.9 ± 13.4% (C-MEN) (p < 0.01). For WOMEN: -14.7 ± 17.4% (modified ACSM); -6.3 ± 16.5% (C-GENERAL); and -1.7 ± 16.2% (C-WOMEN) (p < 0.01).Conclusion:The error of estimate of VO2max by use of sex-specific equations was reduced, but not eliminated, in exercise tests on LLCE. |
id |
SBC-1_77c68f7730ead60d63a2f062f471ba5b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0066-782X2015002300381 |
network_acronym_str |
SBC-1 |
network_name_str |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle ErgometryBreathing Exercise / utilizationPhysical ExertionOxygen ConsumptionCardiopulmonary Exercise TestingDemographic Data; ErgometryAbstractBackground:Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO2max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO2max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, affecting clinical decisions.Objective:To determine the error of estimate of VO2max in cycle ergometry in a population attending clinical exercise testing laboratories, and to propose sex-specific equations to minimize that error.Methods:This study assessed 1715 adults (18 to 91 years, 68% men) undertaking maximum CPX in a lower limbs cycle ergometer (LLCE) with ramp protocol. The percentage error (E%) between measured VO2max and that estimated from the modified ACSM equation (Lang et al. MSSE, 1992) was calculated. Then, estimation equations were developed: 1) for all the population tested (C-GENERAL); and 2) separately by sex (C-MEN and C-WOMEN).Results:Measured VO2max was higher in men than in WOMEN: -29.4 ± 10.5 and 24.2 ± 9.2 mL.(kg.min)-1 (p < 0.01). The equations for estimating VO2max [in mL.(kg.min)-1] were: C-GENERAL = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.483 + 7; C-MEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.791 + 7; and C-WOMEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 9.820 + 7. The E% for MEN was: -3.4 ± 13.4% (modified ACSM); 1.2 ± 13.2% (C-GENERAL); and -0.9 ± 13.4% (C-MEN) (p < 0.01). For WOMEN: -14.7 ± 17.4% (modified ACSM); -6.3 ± 16.5% (C-GENERAL); and -1.7 ± 16.2% (C-WOMEN) (p < 0.01).Conclusion:The error of estimate of VO2max by use of sex-specific equations was reduced, but not eliminated, in exercise tests on LLCE.Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC2015-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2015002300381Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.105 n.4 2015reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)instacron:SBC10.5935/abc.20150089info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Christina G. de Souza eAraújo,Claudio Gil S.eng2015-11-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0066-782X2015002300381Revistahttp://www.arquivosonline.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||arquivos@cardiol.br1678-41700066-782Xopendoar:2015-11-06T00:00Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry |
title |
Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry |
spellingShingle |
Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry Silva,Christina G. de Souza e Breathing Exercise / utilization Physical Exertion Oxygen Consumption Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Demographic Data; Ergometry |
title_short |
Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry |
title_full |
Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry |
title_fullStr |
Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry |
title_sort |
Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry |
author |
Silva,Christina G. de Souza e |
author_facet |
Silva,Christina G. de Souza e Araújo,Claudio Gil S. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Araújo,Claudio Gil S. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva,Christina G. de Souza e Araújo,Claudio Gil S. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Breathing Exercise / utilization Physical Exertion Oxygen Consumption Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Demographic Data; Ergometry |
topic |
Breathing Exercise / utilization Physical Exertion Oxygen Consumption Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Demographic Data; Ergometry |
description |
AbstractBackground:Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO2max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO2max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, affecting clinical decisions.Objective:To determine the error of estimate of VO2max in cycle ergometry in a population attending clinical exercise testing laboratories, and to propose sex-specific equations to minimize that error.Methods:This study assessed 1715 adults (18 to 91 years, 68% men) undertaking maximum CPX in a lower limbs cycle ergometer (LLCE) with ramp protocol. The percentage error (E%) between measured VO2max and that estimated from the modified ACSM equation (Lang et al. MSSE, 1992) was calculated. Then, estimation equations were developed: 1) for all the population tested (C-GENERAL); and 2) separately by sex (C-MEN and C-WOMEN).Results:Measured VO2max was higher in men than in WOMEN: -29.4 ± 10.5 and 24.2 ± 9.2 mL.(kg.min)-1 (p < 0.01). The equations for estimating VO2max [in mL.(kg.min)-1] were: C-GENERAL = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.483 + 7; C-MEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.791 + 7; and C-WOMEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 9.820 + 7. The E% for MEN was: -3.4 ± 13.4% (modified ACSM); 1.2 ± 13.2% (C-GENERAL); and -0.9 ± 13.4% (C-MEN) (p < 0.01). For WOMEN: -14.7 ± 17.4% (modified ACSM); -6.3 ± 16.5% (C-GENERAL); and -1.7 ± 16.2% (C-WOMEN) (p < 0.01).Conclusion:The error of estimate of VO2max by use of sex-specific equations was reduced, but not eliminated, in exercise tests on LLCE. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2015002300381 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2015002300381 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5935/abc.20150089 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.105 n.4 2015 reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) instacron:SBC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) |
instacron_str |
SBC |
institution |
SBC |
reponame_str |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) |
collection |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||arquivos@cardiol.br |
_version_ |
1752126565280382976 |