Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Christina G. de Souza e
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Araújo,Claudio Gil S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2015002300381
Resumo: AbstractBackground:Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO2max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO2max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, affecting clinical decisions.Objective:To determine the error of estimate of VO2max in cycle ergometry in a population attending clinical exercise testing laboratories, and to propose sex-specific equations to minimize that error.Methods:This study assessed 1715 adults (18 to 91 years, 68% men) undertaking maximum CPX in a lower limbs cycle ergometer (LLCE) with ramp protocol. The percentage error (E%) between measured VO2max and that estimated from the modified ACSM equation (Lang et al. MSSE, 1992) was calculated. Then, estimation equations were developed: 1) for all the population tested (C-GENERAL); and 2) separately by sex (C-MEN and C-WOMEN).Results:Measured VO2max was higher in men than in WOMEN: -29.4 ± 10.5 and 24.2 ± 9.2 mL.(kg.min)-1 (p < 0.01). The equations for estimating VO2max [in mL.(kg.min)-1] were: C-GENERAL = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.483 + 7; C-MEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.791 + 7; and C-WOMEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 9.820 + 7. The E% for MEN was: -3.4 ± 13.4% (modified ACSM); 1.2 ± 13.2% (C-GENERAL); and -0.9 ± 13.4% (C-MEN) (p < 0.01). For WOMEN: -14.7 ± 17.4% (modified ACSM); -6.3 ± 16.5% (C-GENERAL); and -1.7 ± 16.2% (C-WOMEN) (p < 0.01).Conclusion:The error of estimate of VO2max by use of sex-specific equations was reduced, but not eliminated, in exercise tests on LLCE.
id SBC-1_77c68f7730ead60d63a2f062f471ba5b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0066-782X2015002300381
network_acronym_str SBC-1
network_name_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle ErgometryBreathing Exercise / utilizationPhysical ExertionOxygen ConsumptionCardiopulmonary Exercise TestingDemographic Data; ErgometryAbstractBackground:Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO2max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO2max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, affecting clinical decisions.Objective:To determine the error of estimate of VO2max in cycle ergometry in a population attending clinical exercise testing laboratories, and to propose sex-specific equations to minimize that error.Methods:This study assessed 1715 adults (18 to 91 years, 68% men) undertaking maximum CPX in a lower limbs cycle ergometer (LLCE) with ramp protocol. The percentage error (E%) between measured VO2max and that estimated from the modified ACSM equation (Lang et al. MSSE, 1992) was calculated. Then, estimation equations were developed: 1) for all the population tested (C-GENERAL); and 2) separately by sex (C-MEN and C-WOMEN).Results:Measured VO2max was higher in men than in WOMEN: -29.4 ± 10.5 and 24.2 ± 9.2 mL.(kg.min)-1 (p < 0.01). The equations for estimating VO2max [in mL.(kg.min)-1] were: C-GENERAL = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.483 + 7; C-MEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.791 + 7; and C-WOMEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 9.820 + 7. The E% for MEN was: -3.4 ± 13.4% (modified ACSM); 1.2 ± 13.2% (C-GENERAL); and -0.9 ± 13.4% (C-MEN) (p < 0.01). For WOMEN: -14.7 ± 17.4% (modified ACSM); -6.3 ± 16.5% (C-GENERAL); and -1.7 ± 16.2% (C-WOMEN) (p < 0.01).Conclusion:The error of estimate of VO2max by use of sex-specific equations was reduced, but not eliminated, in exercise tests on LLCE.Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC2015-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2015002300381Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.105 n.4 2015reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)instacron:SBC10.5935/abc.20150089info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Christina G. de Souza eAraújo,Claudio Gil S.eng2015-11-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0066-782X2015002300381Revistahttp://www.arquivosonline.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||arquivos@cardiol.br1678-41700066-782Xopendoar:2015-11-06T00:00Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
title Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
spellingShingle Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
Silva,Christina G. de Souza e
Breathing Exercise / utilization
Physical Exertion
Oxygen Consumption
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing
Demographic Data; Ergometry
title_short Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
title_full Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
title_fullStr Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
title_full_unstemmed Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
title_sort Sex-Specific Equations to Estimate Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Cycle Ergometry
author Silva,Christina G. de Souza e
author_facet Silva,Christina G. de Souza e
Araújo,Claudio Gil S.
author_role author
author2 Araújo,Claudio Gil S.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Christina G. de Souza e
Araújo,Claudio Gil S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Breathing Exercise / utilization
Physical Exertion
Oxygen Consumption
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing
Demographic Data; Ergometry
topic Breathing Exercise / utilization
Physical Exertion
Oxygen Consumption
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing
Demographic Data; Ergometry
description AbstractBackground:Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO2max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO2max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, affecting clinical decisions.Objective:To determine the error of estimate of VO2max in cycle ergometry in a population attending clinical exercise testing laboratories, and to propose sex-specific equations to minimize that error.Methods:This study assessed 1715 adults (18 to 91 years, 68% men) undertaking maximum CPX in a lower limbs cycle ergometer (LLCE) with ramp protocol. The percentage error (E%) between measured VO2max and that estimated from the modified ACSM equation (Lang et al. MSSE, 1992) was calculated. Then, estimation equations were developed: 1) for all the population tested (C-GENERAL); and 2) separately by sex (C-MEN and C-WOMEN).Results:Measured VO2max was higher in men than in WOMEN: -29.4 ± 10.5 and 24.2 ± 9.2 mL.(kg.min)-1 (p < 0.01). The equations for estimating VO2max [in mL.(kg.min)-1] were: C-GENERAL = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.483 + 7; C-MEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.791 + 7; and C-WOMEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 9.820 + 7. The E% for MEN was: -3.4 ± 13.4% (modified ACSM); 1.2 ± 13.2% (C-GENERAL); and -0.9 ± 13.4% (C-MEN) (p < 0.01). For WOMEN: -14.7 ± 17.4% (modified ACSM); -6.3 ± 16.5% (C-GENERAL); and -1.7 ± 16.2% (C-WOMEN) (p < 0.01).Conclusion:The error of estimate of VO2max by use of sex-specific equations was reduced, but not eliminated, in exercise tests on LLCE.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2015002300381
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2015002300381
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/abc.20150089
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.105 n.4 2015
reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron:SBC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron_str SBC
institution SBC
reponame_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
collection Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||arquivos@cardiol.br
_version_ 1752126565280382976