Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2018001800772 |
Resumo: | Abstract Background: Cardiac remodeling is a specific response to exercise training and time exposure. We hypothesized that athletes engaging for long periods in high-intensity strength training show heart and/or vascular damage. Objective: To compare cardiac characteristics (structure and function) and vascular function (flow-mediated dilation [FMD] and peripheral vascular resistance [PVR]) in powerlifters and long-distance runners. Methods: We evaluated 40 high-performance athletes (powerlifters [PG], n = 16; runners [RG], n = 24) and assessed heart structure and function (echocardiography), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), FMD, PVR, maximum force (squat, bench press, and deadlift), and maximal oxygen uptake (spirometry). A Student’s t Test for independent samples and Pearson’s linear correlation were used (p < 0.05). Results: PG showed higher SBP/DBP (p < 0.001); greater interventricular septum thickness (p < 0.001), posterior wall thickness (p < 0.001) and LV mass (p < 0.001). After adjusting LV mass by body surface area (BSA), no difference was observed. As for diastolic function, LV diastolic volume, wave E, wave e’, and E/e’ ratio were similar for both groups. However, LA volume (p = 0.016) and BSA-adjusted LA volume were lower in PG (p < 0.001). Systolic function (end-systolic volume and ejection fraction), and FMD were similar in both groups. However, higher PVR in PG was observed (p = 0.014). We found a correlation between the main cardiovascular changes and total weight lifted in PG. Conclusions: Cardiovascular adaptations are dependent on training modality and the borderline structural cardiac changes are not accompanied by impaired function in powerlifters. However, a mild increase in blood pressure seems to be related to PVR rather than endothelial function. |
id |
SBC-1_96cecb72b9e5a7dc4c04cb23b36c17a6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0066-782X2018001800772 |
network_acronym_str |
SBC-1 |
network_name_str |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional StudyHypertrohy,VentricularExerciseExercise MovementTechniquesBlood PressureResistance TrainingRunning/physiologyAbstract Background: Cardiac remodeling is a specific response to exercise training and time exposure. We hypothesized that athletes engaging for long periods in high-intensity strength training show heart and/or vascular damage. Objective: To compare cardiac characteristics (structure and function) and vascular function (flow-mediated dilation [FMD] and peripheral vascular resistance [PVR]) in powerlifters and long-distance runners. Methods: We evaluated 40 high-performance athletes (powerlifters [PG], n = 16; runners [RG], n = 24) and assessed heart structure and function (echocardiography), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), FMD, PVR, maximum force (squat, bench press, and deadlift), and maximal oxygen uptake (spirometry). A Student’s t Test for independent samples and Pearson’s linear correlation were used (p < 0.05). Results: PG showed higher SBP/DBP (p < 0.001); greater interventricular septum thickness (p < 0.001), posterior wall thickness (p < 0.001) and LV mass (p < 0.001). After adjusting LV mass by body surface area (BSA), no difference was observed. As for diastolic function, LV diastolic volume, wave E, wave e’, and E/e’ ratio were similar for both groups. However, LA volume (p = 0.016) and BSA-adjusted LA volume were lower in PG (p < 0.001). Systolic function (end-systolic volume and ejection fraction), and FMD were similar in both groups. However, higher PVR in PG was observed (p = 0.014). We found a correlation between the main cardiovascular changes and total weight lifted in PG. Conclusions: Cardiovascular adaptations are dependent on training modality and the borderline structural cardiac changes are not accompanied by impaired function in powerlifters. However, a mild increase in blood pressure seems to be related to PVR rather than endothelial function.Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2018001800772Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.111 n.6 2018reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)instacron:SBC10.5935/abc.20180167info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Diego VidalettiWaclawovsky,GustavoKramer,Ana BeatrizStein,CinaraEibel,BrunaGrezzana,Guilherme BrasilSchaun,Maximiliano IsoppoLehnen,Alexandre Machadoeng2018-11-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0066-782X2018001800772Revistahttp://www.arquivosonline.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||arquivos@cardiol.br1678-41700066-782Xopendoar:2018-11-27T00:00Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study |
title |
Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study Silva,Diego Vidaletti Hypertrohy,Ventricular Exercise Exercise MovementTechniques Blood Pressure Resistance Training Running/physiology |
title_short |
Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full |
Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort |
Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study |
author |
Silva,Diego Vidaletti |
author_facet |
Silva,Diego Vidaletti Waclawovsky,Gustavo Kramer,Ana Beatriz Stein,Cinara Eibel,Bruna Grezzana,Guilherme Brasil Schaun,Maximiliano Isoppo Lehnen,Alexandre Machado |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Waclawovsky,Gustavo Kramer,Ana Beatriz Stein,Cinara Eibel,Bruna Grezzana,Guilherme Brasil Schaun,Maximiliano Isoppo Lehnen,Alexandre Machado |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva,Diego Vidaletti Waclawovsky,Gustavo Kramer,Ana Beatriz Stein,Cinara Eibel,Bruna Grezzana,Guilherme Brasil Schaun,Maximiliano Isoppo Lehnen,Alexandre Machado |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hypertrohy,Ventricular Exercise Exercise MovementTechniques Blood Pressure Resistance Training Running/physiology |
topic |
Hypertrohy,Ventricular Exercise Exercise MovementTechniques Blood Pressure Resistance Training Running/physiology |
description |
Abstract Background: Cardiac remodeling is a specific response to exercise training and time exposure. We hypothesized that athletes engaging for long periods in high-intensity strength training show heart and/or vascular damage. Objective: To compare cardiac characteristics (structure and function) and vascular function (flow-mediated dilation [FMD] and peripheral vascular resistance [PVR]) in powerlifters and long-distance runners. Methods: We evaluated 40 high-performance athletes (powerlifters [PG], n = 16; runners [RG], n = 24) and assessed heart structure and function (echocardiography), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), FMD, PVR, maximum force (squat, bench press, and deadlift), and maximal oxygen uptake (spirometry). A Student’s t Test for independent samples and Pearson’s linear correlation were used (p < 0.05). Results: PG showed higher SBP/DBP (p < 0.001); greater interventricular septum thickness (p < 0.001), posterior wall thickness (p < 0.001) and LV mass (p < 0.001). After adjusting LV mass by body surface area (BSA), no difference was observed. As for diastolic function, LV diastolic volume, wave E, wave e’, and E/e’ ratio were similar for both groups. However, LA volume (p = 0.016) and BSA-adjusted LA volume were lower in PG (p < 0.001). Systolic function (end-systolic volume and ejection fraction), and FMD were similar in both groups. However, higher PVR in PG was observed (p = 0.014). We found a correlation between the main cardiovascular changes and total weight lifted in PG. Conclusions: Cardiovascular adaptations are dependent on training modality and the borderline structural cardiac changes are not accompanied by impaired function in powerlifters. However, a mild increase in blood pressure seems to be related to PVR rather than endothelial function. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2018001800772 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2018001800772 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5935/abc.20180167 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.111 n.6 2018 reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) instacron:SBC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) |
instacron_str |
SBC |
institution |
SBC |
reponame_str |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) |
collection |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||arquivos@cardiol.br |
_version_ |
1752126569036382208 |