Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Diego Vidaletti
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Waclawovsky,Gustavo, Kramer,Ana Beatriz, Stein,Cinara, Eibel,Bruna, Grezzana,Guilherme Brasil, Schaun,Maximiliano Isoppo, Lehnen,Alexandre Machado
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2018001800772
Resumo: Abstract Background: Cardiac remodeling is a specific response to exercise training and time exposure. We hypothesized that athletes engaging for long periods in high-intensity strength training show heart and/or vascular damage. Objective: To compare cardiac characteristics (structure and function) and vascular function (flow-mediated dilation [FMD] and peripheral vascular resistance [PVR]) in powerlifters and long-distance runners. Methods: We evaluated 40 high-performance athletes (powerlifters [PG], n = 16; runners [RG], n = 24) and assessed heart structure and function (echocardiography), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), FMD, PVR, maximum force (squat, bench press, and deadlift), and maximal oxygen uptake (spirometry). A Student’s t Test for independent samples and Pearson’s linear correlation were used (p < 0.05). Results: PG showed higher SBP/DBP (p < 0.001); greater interventricular septum thickness (p < 0.001), posterior wall thickness (p < 0.001) and LV mass (p < 0.001). After adjusting LV mass by body surface area (BSA), no difference was observed. As for diastolic function, LV diastolic volume, wave E, wave e’, and E/e’ ratio were similar for both groups. However, LA volume (p = 0.016) and BSA-adjusted LA volume were lower in PG (p < 0.001). Systolic function (end-systolic volume and ejection fraction), and FMD were similar in both groups. However, higher PVR in PG was observed (p = 0.014). We found a correlation between the main cardiovascular changes and total weight lifted in PG. Conclusions: Cardiovascular adaptations are dependent on training modality and the borderline structural cardiac changes are not accompanied by impaired function in powerlifters. However, a mild increase in blood pressure seems to be related to PVR rather than endothelial function.
id SBC-1_96cecb72b9e5a7dc4c04cb23b36c17a6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0066-782X2018001800772
network_acronym_str SBC-1
network_name_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional StudyHypertrohy,VentricularExerciseExercise MovementTechniquesBlood PressureResistance TrainingRunning/physiologyAbstract Background: Cardiac remodeling is a specific response to exercise training and time exposure. We hypothesized that athletes engaging for long periods in high-intensity strength training show heart and/or vascular damage. Objective: To compare cardiac characteristics (structure and function) and vascular function (flow-mediated dilation [FMD] and peripheral vascular resistance [PVR]) in powerlifters and long-distance runners. Methods: We evaluated 40 high-performance athletes (powerlifters [PG], n = 16; runners [RG], n = 24) and assessed heart structure and function (echocardiography), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), FMD, PVR, maximum force (squat, bench press, and deadlift), and maximal oxygen uptake (spirometry). A Student’s t Test for independent samples and Pearson’s linear correlation were used (p < 0.05). Results: PG showed higher SBP/DBP (p < 0.001); greater interventricular septum thickness (p < 0.001), posterior wall thickness (p < 0.001) and LV mass (p < 0.001). After adjusting LV mass by body surface area (BSA), no difference was observed. As for diastolic function, LV diastolic volume, wave E, wave e’, and E/e’ ratio were similar for both groups. However, LA volume (p = 0.016) and BSA-adjusted LA volume were lower in PG (p < 0.001). Systolic function (end-systolic volume and ejection fraction), and FMD were similar in both groups. However, higher PVR in PG was observed (p = 0.014). We found a correlation between the main cardiovascular changes and total weight lifted in PG. Conclusions: Cardiovascular adaptations are dependent on training modality and the borderline structural cardiac changes are not accompanied by impaired function in powerlifters. However, a mild increase in blood pressure seems to be related to PVR rather than endothelial function.Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2018001800772Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.111 n.6 2018reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)instacron:SBC10.5935/abc.20180167info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Diego VidalettiWaclawovsky,GustavoKramer,Ana BeatrizStein,CinaraEibel,BrunaGrezzana,Guilherme BrasilSchaun,Maximiliano IsoppoLehnen,Alexandre Machadoeng2018-11-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0066-782X2018001800772Revistahttp://www.arquivosonline.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||arquivos@cardiol.br1678-41700066-782Xopendoar:2018-11-27T00:00Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
spellingShingle Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
Silva,Diego Vidaletti
Hypertrohy,Ventricular
Exercise
Exercise MovementTechniques
Blood Pressure
Resistance Training
Running/physiology
title_short Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort Comparison of Cardiac and Vascular Parameters in Powerlifters and Long-Distance Runners: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
author Silva,Diego Vidaletti
author_facet Silva,Diego Vidaletti
Waclawovsky,Gustavo
Kramer,Ana Beatriz
Stein,Cinara
Eibel,Bruna
Grezzana,Guilherme Brasil
Schaun,Maximiliano Isoppo
Lehnen,Alexandre Machado
author_role author
author2 Waclawovsky,Gustavo
Kramer,Ana Beatriz
Stein,Cinara
Eibel,Bruna
Grezzana,Guilherme Brasil
Schaun,Maximiliano Isoppo
Lehnen,Alexandre Machado
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Diego Vidaletti
Waclawovsky,Gustavo
Kramer,Ana Beatriz
Stein,Cinara
Eibel,Bruna
Grezzana,Guilherme Brasil
Schaun,Maximiliano Isoppo
Lehnen,Alexandre Machado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hypertrohy,Ventricular
Exercise
Exercise MovementTechniques
Blood Pressure
Resistance Training
Running/physiology
topic Hypertrohy,Ventricular
Exercise
Exercise MovementTechniques
Blood Pressure
Resistance Training
Running/physiology
description Abstract Background: Cardiac remodeling is a specific response to exercise training and time exposure. We hypothesized that athletes engaging for long periods in high-intensity strength training show heart and/or vascular damage. Objective: To compare cardiac characteristics (structure and function) and vascular function (flow-mediated dilation [FMD] and peripheral vascular resistance [PVR]) in powerlifters and long-distance runners. Methods: We evaluated 40 high-performance athletes (powerlifters [PG], n = 16; runners [RG], n = 24) and assessed heart structure and function (echocardiography), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), FMD, PVR, maximum force (squat, bench press, and deadlift), and maximal oxygen uptake (spirometry). A Student’s t Test for independent samples and Pearson’s linear correlation were used (p < 0.05). Results: PG showed higher SBP/DBP (p < 0.001); greater interventricular septum thickness (p < 0.001), posterior wall thickness (p < 0.001) and LV mass (p < 0.001). After adjusting LV mass by body surface area (BSA), no difference was observed. As for diastolic function, LV diastolic volume, wave E, wave e’, and E/e’ ratio were similar for both groups. However, LA volume (p = 0.016) and BSA-adjusted LA volume were lower in PG (p < 0.001). Systolic function (end-systolic volume and ejection fraction), and FMD were similar in both groups. However, higher PVR in PG was observed (p = 0.014). We found a correlation between the main cardiovascular changes and total weight lifted in PG. Conclusions: Cardiovascular adaptations are dependent on training modality and the borderline structural cardiac changes are not accompanied by impaired function in powerlifters. However, a mild increase in blood pressure seems to be related to PVR rather than endothelial function.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2018001800772
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2018001800772
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/abc.20180167
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia v.111 n.6 2018
reponame:Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron:SBC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron_str SBC
institution SBC
reponame_str Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
collection Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||arquivos@cardiol.br
_version_ 1752126569036382208