Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Conceição,Ariani França
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Muniz,Daniell Lima, Santos,Clarcson Plácido Conceição dos, Queiroz,Ciro Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000300294
Resumo: Abstract Background Resistance training is used in different exercise programs, with different objectives and different levels of physical fitness. Training-related variables, such as volume, rest time and intensity, can affect the response of blood pressure (BP), but studies on the effect of these variables on BP are still needed. Objective To evaluate the acute response of BP in trained individuals undergoing two different methods of resistance training. Methods The sample was divided into three groups: (1) the German volume training (GVT) (n= 15), which consisted of 10 series of 10 repetitions at 50% of 1-repetition maximum (RM) with intervals of 30 seconds; (2) the sarcoplasm stimulating training (SST) (n= 16), performed at 8 RM and 85% of 1-RM and interval of 10 seconds until failure, followed by removal of 20% of weight and repetition of the whole series (total of three sets), and the control group (CG) (n= 15) who underwent BP measurements only. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used for analysis of variations, and a p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results In the within-group analysis, a significant lowering of systolic blood pressure (SBP) was found at 10 minutes (125.4±10.8 mmHg, p= 0.045) and 20 minutes (124.5±8.5 mmHg, p= 0.044) post-training compared with immediately after training. In the between-group comparison, higher SBP values were observed immediately after training in the SST group (142.1±28.2, p= 0.048) compared with the CG. Conclusion High-volume and high-intensity resistance training programs did not cause abnormal changes in blood pressure. (Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2021; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)
id SBC-2_20c51bdba5d6f68e12c8903e8a329593
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2359-56472021000300294
network_acronym_str SBC-2
network_name_str International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained MenResistance TrainingExerciseBlood PressureHypertensionCircuit Based ExerciseMenRehabilitationAbstract Background Resistance training is used in different exercise programs, with different objectives and different levels of physical fitness. Training-related variables, such as volume, rest time and intensity, can affect the response of blood pressure (BP), but studies on the effect of these variables on BP are still needed. Objective To evaluate the acute response of BP in trained individuals undergoing two different methods of resistance training. Methods The sample was divided into three groups: (1) the German volume training (GVT) (n= 15), which consisted of 10 series of 10 repetitions at 50% of 1-repetition maximum (RM) with intervals of 30 seconds; (2) the sarcoplasm stimulating training (SST) (n= 16), performed at 8 RM and 85% of 1-RM and interval of 10 seconds until failure, followed by removal of 20% of weight and repetition of the whole series (total of three sets), and the control group (CG) (n= 15) who underwent BP measurements only. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used for analysis of variations, and a p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results In the within-group analysis, a significant lowering of systolic blood pressure (SBP) was found at 10 minutes (125.4±10.8 mmHg, p= 0.045) and 20 minutes (124.5±8.5 mmHg, p= 0.044) post-training compared with immediately after training. In the between-group comparison, higher SBP values were observed immediately after training in the SST group (142.1±28.2, p= 0.048) compared with the CG. Conclusion High-volume and high-intensity resistance training programs did not cause abnormal changes in blood pressure. (Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2021; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia2021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000300294International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences v.34 n.3 2021reponame:International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)instacron:SBC10.36660/ijcs.20190215info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessConceição,Ariani FrançaMuniz,Daniell LimaSantos,Clarcson Plácido Conceição dosQueiroz,Ciro Oliveiraeng2022-02-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2359-56472021000300294Revistahttp://publicacoes.cardiol.br/portal/ijcshttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptailanerodrigues@cardiol.br||revistaijcs@cardiol.br2359-56472359-4802opendoar:2022-02-02T00:00International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men
title Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men
spellingShingle Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men
Conceição,Ariani França
Resistance Training
Exercise
Blood Pressure
Hypertension
Circuit Based Exercise
Men
Rehabilitation
title_short Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men
title_full Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men
title_fullStr Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men
title_full_unstemmed Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men
title_sort Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men
author Conceição,Ariani França
author_facet Conceição,Ariani França
Muniz,Daniell Lima
Santos,Clarcson Plácido Conceição dos
Queiroz,Ciro Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Muniz,Daniell Lima
Santos,Clarcson Plácido Conceição dos
Queiroz,Ciro Oliveira
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Conceição,Ariani França
Muniz,Daniell Lima
Santos,Clarcson Plácido Conceição dos
Queiroz,Ciro Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Resistance Training
Exercise
Blood Pressure
Hypertension
Circuit Based Exercise
Men
Rehabilitation
topic Resistance Training
Exercise
Blood Pressure
Hypertension
Circuit Based Exercise
Men
Rehabilitation
description Abstract Background Resistance training is used in different exercise programs, with different objectives and different levels of physical fitness. Training-related variables, such as volume, rest time and intensity, can affect the response of blood pressure (BP), but studies on the effect of these variables on BP are still needed. Objective To evaluate the acute response of BP in trained individuals undergoing two different methods of resistance training. Methods The sample was divided into three groups: (1) the German volume training (GVT) (n= 15), which consisted of 10 series of 10 repetitions at 50% of 1-repetition maximum (RM) with intervals of 30 seconds; (2) the sarcoplasm stimulating training (SST) (n= 16), performed at 8 RM and 85% of 1-RM and interval of 10 seconds until failure, followed by removal of 20% of weight and repetition of the whole series (total of three sets), and the control group (CG) (n= 15) who underwent BP measurements only. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used for analysis of variations, and a p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results In the within-group analysis, a significant lowering of systolic blood pressure (SBP) was found at 10 minutes (125.4±10.8 mmHg, p= 0.045) and 20 minutes (124.5±8.5 mmHg, p= 0.044) post-training compared with immediately after training. In the between-group comparison, higher SBP values were observed immediately after training in the SST group (142.1±28.2, p= 0.048) compared with the CG. Conclusion High-volume and high-intensity resistance training programs did not cause abnormal changes in blood pressure. (Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2021; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000300294
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000300294
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.36660/ijcs.20190215
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences v.34 n.3 2021
reponame:International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron:SBC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron_str SBC
institution SBC
reponame_str International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
collection International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tailanerodrigues@cardiol.br||revistaijcs@cardiol.br
_version_ 1754732627040927744