THORACIC DISC HERNIATION: SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION BY POSTERIOR APPROACH A LA CARTE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: DAHER,MURILO TAVARES
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: FELISBINO JUNIOR,PEDRO, ESPERIDIÃO,ADRIANO PASSÁGLIA, ARAÚJO,BRENDA CRISTINA RIBEIRO, CARDOSO,ANDRÉ LUIZ PASSOS, PIMENTA JUNIOR,WILSON ELOY, DAHER,SÉRGIO
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000300213
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objectives: To present the clinical and radiographic results of patients with thoracic disc herniation treated by the posterior approach, according to location and type of hernia (à la carte). Methods: We evaluated thirteen patients (14 hernias) treated by the posterior approach. Eight (61.5%) patients were male and the mean age was 53 years (34-81). Clinical evaluation was performed by the Frankel and JOA modified scales. All the patients underwent the posterior approach, which was performed by facetectomy, transpedicular approach, transpedicular + partial body resection, costotransversectomy or costotransversectomy + reconstruction with CAGE. Results: The mean follow-up was 2 years and 6 months (11-77 months). Of the 14 operated hernias, six (43%) were lateral, 2 (14%) paramedian, and 6 (43%) central. Seven were soft (50%) and seven were calcified. The transfacet approach was carried out in 5 cases (36%), transpedicular in 1 case (7%), transpedicular + partial body resection in 4 (29%), costotransversectomy in 3 (21%), and costotransversectomy + CAGE in one case (7%). The majority of patients with lateral hernia (5/6) were subjected to transfacet decompression and in cases of central and paramedian hernias, all patients underwent decompression, which is more extensive. Conclusions: The posterior approach is safe and effective, and the best approach must be chosen based on location and type of the herniation and the surgeon's experience.
id SBCO-1_175307e6887636c80409b1c0fc3d5d52
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512016000300213
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling THORACIC DISC HERNIATION: SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION BY POSTERIOR APPROACH A LA CARTESpineIntervertebral disc displacementSpondylosisEvaluation of results of therapeutic interventionsSpinal cord compressionABSTRACT Objectives: To present the clinical and radiographic results of patients with thoracic disc herniation treated by the posterior approach, according to location and type of hernia (à la carte). Methods: We evaluated thirteen patients (14 hernias) treated by the posterior approach. Eight (61.5%) patients were male and the mean age was 53 years (34-81). Clinical evaluation was performed by the Frankel and JOA modified scales. All the patients underwent the posterior approach, which was performed by facetectomy, transpedicular approach, transpedicular + partial body resection, costotransversectomy or costotransversectomy + reconstruction with CAGE. Results: The mean follow-up was 2 years and 6 months (11-77 months). Of the 14 operated hernias, six (43%) were lateral, 2 (14%) paramedian, and 6 (43%) central. Seven were soft (50%) and seven were calcified. The transfacet approach was carried out in 5 cases (36%), transpedicular in 1 case (7%), transpedicular + partial body resection in 4 (29%), costotransversectomy in 3 (21%), and costotransversectomy + CAGE in one case (7%). The majority of patients with lateral hernia (5/6) were subjected to transfacet decompression and in cases of central and paramedian hernias, all patients underwent decompression, which is more extensive. Conclusions: The posterior approach is safe and effective, and the best approach must be chosen based on location and type of the herniation and the surgeon's experience.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2016-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000300213Coluna/Columna v.15 n.3 2016reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/S1808-185120161503157849info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDAHER,MURILO TAVARESFELISBINO JUNIOR,PEDROESPERIDIÃO,ADRIANO PASSÁGLIAARAÚJO,BRENDA CRISTINA RIBEIROCARDOSO,ANDRÉ LUIZ PASSOSPIMENTA JUNIOR,WILSON ELOYDAHER,SÉRGIOeng2016-09-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512016000300213Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2016-09-23T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THORACIC DISC HERNIATION: SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION BY POSTERIOR APPROACH A LA CARTE
title THORACIC DISC HERNIATION: SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION BY POSTERIOR APPROACH A LA CARTE
spellingShingle THORACIC DISC HERNIATION: SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION BY POSTERIOR APPROACH A LA CARTE
DAHER,MURILO TAVARES
Spine
Intervertebral disc displacement
Spondylosis
Evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions
Spinal cord compression
title_short THORACIC DISC HERNIATION: SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION BY POSTERIOR APPROACH A LA CARTE
title_full THORACIC DISC HERNIATION: SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION BY POSTERIOR APPROACH A LA CARTE
title_fullStr THORACIC DISC HERNIATION: SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION BY POSTERIOR APPROACH A LA CARTE
title_full_unstemmed THORACIC DISC HERNIATION: SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION BY POSTERIOR APPROACH A LA CARTE
title_sort THORACIC DISC HERNIATION: SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION BY POSTERIOR APPROACH A LA CARTE
author DAHER,MURILO TAVARES
author_facet DAHER,MURILO TAVARES
FELISBINO JUNIOR,PEDRO
ESPERIDIÃO,ADRIANO PASSÁGLIA
ARAÚJO,BRENDA CRISTINA RIBEIRO
CARDOSO,ANDRÉ LUIZ PASSOS
PIMENTA JUNIOR,WILSON ELOY
DAHER,SÉRGIO
author_role author
author2 FELISBINO JUNIOR,PEDRO
ESPERIDIÃO,ADRIANO PASSÁGLIA
ARAÚJO,BRENDA CRISTINA RIBEIRO
CARDOSO,ANDRÉ LUIZ PASSOS
PIMENTA JUNIOR,WILSON ELOY
DAHER,SÉRGIO
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv DAHER,MURILO TAVARES
FELISBINO JUNIOR,PEDRO
ESPERIDIÃO,ADRIANO PASSÁGLIA
ARAÚJO,BRENDA CRISTINA RIBEIRO
CARDOSO,ANDRÉ LUIZ PASSOS
PIMENTA JUNIOR,WILSON ELOY
DAHER,SÉRGIO
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Spine
Intervertebral disc displacement
Spondylosis
Evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions
Spinal cord compression
topic Spine
Intervertebral disc displacement
Spondylosis
Evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions
Spinal cord compression
description ABSTRACT Objectives: To present the clinical and radiographic results of patients with thoracic disc herniation treated by the posterior approach, according to location and type of hernia (à la carte). Methods: We evaluated thirteen patients (14 hernias) treated by the posterior approach. Eight (61.5%) patients were male and the mean age was 53 years (34-81). Clinical evaluation was performed by the Frankel and JOA modified scales. All the patients underwent the posterior approach, which was performed by facetectomy, transpedicular approach, transpedicular + partial body resection, costotransversectomy or costotransversectomy + reconstruction with CAGE. Results: The mean follow-up was 2 years and 6 months (11-77 months). Of the 14 operated hernias, six (43%) were lateral, 2 (14%) paramedian, and 6 (43%) central. Seven were soft (50%) and seven were calcified. The transfacet approach was carried out in 5 cases (36%), transpedicular in 1 case (7%), transpedicular + partial body resection in 4 (29%), costotransversectomy in 3 (21%), and costotransversectomy + CAGE in one case (7%). The majority of patients with lateral hernia (5/6) were subjected to transfacet decompression and in cases of central and paramedian hernias, all patients underwent decompression, which is more extensive. Conclusions: The posterior approach is safe and effective, and the best approach must be chosen based on location and type of the herniation and the surgeon's experience.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000300213
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000300213
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1808-185120161503157849
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.15 n.3 2016
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126615193649152