COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE TREATMENT OF DISC HERNIATIONS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Suárez-Huerta,María Luz
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Iglesia-Diez,Elena, Castro,Alfredo Álvarez, Nicolás,Jesús Betegón, Campos,Sonia Sánchez, Saavedra,Antonio Luis Mostaza, Fernández-González,Manuel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000400295
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the results of treatment of patients with low back pain and radiculalgia resulting from disc herniation associated with disc degeneration through instrumentation with pedicle screws and dynamic rod, with root release and without diskectomy compared with other non-instrumented techniques (microdiskectomy with or without foraminotomy). Methods: This is a retrospective descriptive study of interventions for patients with herniated discs in the Traumatology and Neurosurgery that used the following variables: age, sex, type of technique, surgical time, time of evolution, degree of satisfaction, and complications. Two groups were formed: instrumentation with dynamic rods and non-instrumented techniques, comparing the results of each group. The software used was the SPSS v20.0. Results: We presented 142 interventions carried out between 2009 and 2012, 86 with dynamic instrumentation and 56 by other decompression techniques without instrumentation. No statistically significant differences were observed between age and sex groups and time elapsed until intervention. We found statistically significant differences (p=0.001) in surgical time, which was lower in the instrumented technique. No significant differences were found in complications between the techniques in both re-operations and in infections. Conclusions: In this study, we found no significant differences between the use of instrumentation with dynamic rods with respect to other non-instrumented surgical techniques in the treatment of herniated discs over 6 months of evolution or the complications and the degree of the patients' satisfaction.
id SBCO-1_65f1f2dbe62019998c75d3069fdeefbb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512016000400295
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE TREATMENT OF DISC HERNIATIONSIntervertebral disc displacement/therapyDiskectomyPedicle screws.ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the results of treatment of patients with low back pain and radiculalgia resulting from disc herniation associated with disc degeneration through instrumentation with pedicle screws and dynamic rod, with root release and without diskectomy compared with other non-instrumented techniques (microdiskectomy with or without foraminotomy). Methods: This is a retrospective descriptive study of interventions for patients with herniated discs in the Traumatology and Neurosurgery that used the following variables: age, sex, type of technique, surgical time, time of evolution, degree of satisfaction, and complications. Two groups were formed: instrumentation with dynamic rods and non-instrumented techniques, comparing the results of each group. The software used was the SPSS v20.0. Results: We presented 142 interventions carried out between 2009 and 2012, 86 with dynamic instrumentation and 56 by other decompression techniques without instrumentation. No statistically significant differences were observed between age and sex groups and time elapsed until intervention. We found statistically significant differences (p=0.001) in surgical time, which was lower in the instrumented technique. No significant differences were found in complications between the techniques in both re-operations and in infections. Conclusions: In this study, we found no significant differences between the use of instrumentation with dynamic rods with respect to other non-instrumented surgical techniques in the treatment of herniated discs over 6 months of evolution or the complications and the degree of the patients' satisfaction.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000400295Coluna/Columna v.15 n.4 2016reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120161504146381info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSuárez-Huerta,María LuzIglesia-Diez,ElenaCastro,Alfredo ÁlvarezNicolás,Jesús BetegónCampos,Sonia SánchezSaavedra,Antonio Luis MostazaFernández-González,Manueleng2016-12-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512016000400295Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2016-12-20T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE TREATMENT OF DISC HERNIATIONS
title COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE TREATMENT OF DISC HERNIATIONS
spellingShingle COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE TREATMENT OF DISC HERNIATIONS
Suárez-Huerta,María Luz
Intervertebral disc displacement/therapy
Diskectomy
Pedicle screws.
title_short COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE TREATMENT OF DISC HERNIATIONS
title_full COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE TREATMENT OF DISC HERNIATIONS
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE TREATMENT OF DISC HERNIATIONS
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE TREATMENT OF DISC HERNIATIONS
title_sort COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE TREATMENT OF DISC HERNIATIONS
author Suárez-Huerta,María Luz
author_facet Suárez-Huerta,María Luz
Iglesia-Diez,Elena
Castro,Alfredo Álvarez
Nicolás,Jesús Betegón
Campos,Sonia Sánchez
Saavedra,Antonio Luis Mostaza
Fernández-González,Manuel
author_role author
author2 Iglesia-Diez,Elena
Castro,Alfredo Álvarez
Nicolás,Jesús Betegón
Campos,Sonia Sánchez
Saavedra,Antonio Luis Mostaza
Fernández-González,Manuel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Suárez-Huerta,María Luz
Iglesia-Diez,Elena
Castro,Alfredo Álvarez
Nicolás,Jesús Betegón
Campos,Sonia Sánchez
Saavedra,Antonio Luis Mostaza
Fernández-González,Manuel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intervertebral disc displacement/therapy
Diskectomy
Pedicle screws.
topic Intervertebral disc displacement/therapy
Diskectomy
Pedicle screws.
description ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the results of treatment of patients with low back pain and radiculalgia resulting from disc herniation associated with disc degeneration through instrumentation with pedicle screws and dynamic rod, with root release and without diskectomy compared with other non-instrumented techniques (microdiskectomy with or without foraminotomy). Methods: This is a retrospective descriptive study of interventions for patients with herniated discs in the Traumatology and Neurosurgery that used the following variables: age, sex, type of technique, surgical time, time of evolution, degree of satisfaction, and complications. Two groups were formed: instrumentation with dynamic rods and non-instrumented techniques, comparing the results of each group. The software used was the SPSS v20.0. Results: We presented 142 interventions carried out between 2009 and 2012, 86 with dynamic instrumentation and 56 by other decompression techniques without instrumentation. No statistically significant differences were observed between age and sex groups and time elapsed until intervention. We found statistically significant differences (p=0.001) in surgical time, which was lower in the instrumented technique. No significant differences were found in complications between the techniques in both re-operations and in infections. Conclusions: In this study, we found no significant differences between the use of instrumentation with dynamic rods with respect to other non-instrumented surgical techniques in the treatment of herniated discs over 6 months of evolution or the complications and the degree of the patients' satisfaction.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000400295
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000400295
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1808-185120161504146381
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.15 n.4 2016
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126615475716096