Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kanas,Michel
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Leite,Marcio Squassoni, Ueta,Renato Hiroshi Salvioni, Curto,David Del, Martins,Délio Eulálio, Wajchenberg,Marcelo, Puertas,Eduardo Barros
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512014000100031
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to measure the intervertebral disc height in radiographs with inter- and intraobserver comparison. METHOD: Six radiographs of different patients treated for low back pain have been collected and digitized, and five lumbar disc of each patient were evaluated by six examiners with different levels of experience. The measures were done in Image Pro Plus 6.0 software. RESULTS: When compared, both methods showed more than 95% concordance. In intraexaminer analysis, both also shown to be reliable and reproducible, with a high level of concordance. By comparing the correlation between classes of examiners, the higher the level of experience, the greater the agreement for both methods. CONCLUSION: Farfan modified and Frobin are reliable methods to measure the disc height in the lateral radiographs. The higher level of experience of the examiner, the higher was the correlation between measurements.
id SBCO-1_ebcbb9a56d29bd10cc2b89d42350bff5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512014000100031
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc heightIntervertebral discIntervertebral disc degenerationSpinal osteochondrosis OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to measure the intervertebral disc height in radiographs with inter- and intraobserver comparison. METHOD: Six radiographs of different patients treated for low back pain have been collected and digitized, and five lumbar disc of each patient were evaluated by six examiners with different levels of experience. The measures were done in Image Pro Plus 6.0 software. RESULTS: When compared, both methods showed more than 95% concordance. In intraexaminer analysis, both also shown to be reliable and reproducible, with a high level of concordance. By comparing the correlation between classes of examiners, the higher the level of experience, the greater the agreement for both methods. CONCLUSION: Farfan modified and Frobin are reliable methods to measure the disc height in the lateral radiographs. The higher level of experience of the examiner, the higher was the correlation between measurements. Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2014-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512014000100031Coluna/Columna v.13 n.1 2014reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/S1808-18512014130100313info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKanas,MichelLeite,Marcio SquassoniUeta,Renato Hiroshi SalvioniCurto,David DelMartins,Délio EulálioWajchenberg,MarceloPuertas,Eduardo Barroseng2015-08-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512014000100031Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2015-08-18T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
title Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
spellingShingle Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
Kanas,Michel
Intervertebral disc
Intervertebral disc degeneration
Spinal osteochondrosis
title_short Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
title_full Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
title_fullStr Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
title_sort Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
author Kanas,Michel
author_facet Kanas,Michel
Leite,Marcio Squassoni
Ueta,Renato Hiroshi Salvioni
Curto,David Del
Martins,Délio Eulálio
Wajchenberg,Marcelo
Puertas,Eduardo Barros
author_role author
author2 Leite,Marcio Squassoni
Ueta,Renato Hiroshi Salvioni
Curto,David Del
Martins,Délio Eulálio
Wajchenberg,Marcelo
Puertas,Eduardo Barros
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kanas,Michel
Leite,Marcio Squassoni
Ueta,Renato Hiroshi Salvioni
Curto,David Del
Martins,Délio Eulálio
Wajchenberg,Marcelo
Puertas,Eduardo Barros
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intervertebral disc
Intervertebral disc degeneration
Spinal osteochondrosis
topic Intervertebral disc
Intervertebral disc degeneration
Spinal osteochondrosis
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to measure the intervertebral disc height in radiographs with inter- and intraobserver comparison. METHOD: Six radiographs of different patients treated for low back pain have been collected and digitized, and five lumbar disc of each patient were evaluated by six examiners with different levels of experience. The measures were done in Image Pro Plus 6.0 software. RESULTS: When compared, both methods showed more than 95% concordance. In intraexaminer analysis, both also shown to be reliable and reproducible, with a high level of concordance. By comparing the correlation between classes of examiners, the higher the level of experience, the greater the agreement for both methods. CONCLUSION: Farfan modified and Frobin are reliable methods to measure the disc height in the lateral radiographs. The higher level of experience of the examiner, the higher was the correlation between measurements.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512014000100031
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512014000100031
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1808-18512014130100313
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.13 n.1 2014
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126614662021120