Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kanas, Michel
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Leite, Marcio Squassoni, Ueta, Renato Hiroshi Salvioni, Del Curto, David [UNIFESP], Martins, Délio Eulálio, Wajchenberg, Marcelo [UNIFESP], Puertas, Eduardo Barros [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
dARK ID: ark:/48912/0013000000q1c
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-18512014130100313
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/8266
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to measure the intervertebral disc height in radiographs with inter- and intraobserver comparison. METHOD: Six radiographs of different patients treated for low back pain have been collected and digitized, and five lumbar disc of each patient were evaluated by six examiners with different levels of experience. The measures were done in Image Pro Plus 6.0 software. RESULTS: When compared, both methods showed more than 95% concordance. In intraexaminer analysis, both also shown to be reliable and reproducible, with a high level of concordance. By comparing the correlation between classes of examiners, the higher the level of experience, the greater the agreement for both methods. CONCLUSION: Farfan modified and Frobin are reliable methods to measure the disc height in the lateral radiographs. The higher level of experience of the examiner, the higher was the correlation between measurements.
id UFSP_6d3584005394d27daf13dfb603bcb416
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/8266
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc heightComparación de los métodos de Farfan modificado e de Frobin para la medición de la altura del disco intervertebralComparação dos métodos de Farfan modificado e de Frobin, para aferição da altura do disco intervertebralIntervertebral discIntervertebral disc degenerationSpinal osteochondrosisDisco intervertebralDegeneração do disco intervertebralOsteocondrose da coluna vertebralOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to measure the intervertebral disc height in radiographs with inter- and intraobserver comparison. METHOD: Six radiographs of different patients treated for low back pain have been collected and digitized, and five lumbar disc of each patient were evaluated by six examiners with different levels of experience. The measures were done in Image Pro Plus 6.0 software. RESULTS: When compared, both methods showed more than 95% concordance. In intraexaminer analysis, both also shown to be reliable and reproducible, with a high level of concordance. By comparing the correlation between classes of examiners, the higher the level of experience, the greater the agreement for both methods. CONCLUSION: Farfan modified and Frobin are reliable methods to measure the disc height in the lateral radiographs. The higher level of experience of the examiner, the higher was the correlation between measurements.OBJETIVO: Evaluar la confiabilidad y reproducibilidad de los métodos de Farfan modificado y Frobin para medición de la altura radiográfica de los discos intervertebrales lumbares por comparación inter e intraobservadores.MÉTODO: Imágenes radiográficas fueron recogidas y digitalizadas de 6 pacientes con queja de dolor lumbar; fueron evaluados cinco discos lumbares de cada paciente. Las mediciones fueron realizadas en el software Image Pro Plus versión 6.0, por seis examinadores con diferentes niveles de experiencia.RESULTADOS: Al ser comparados entre sí, los métodos demostraron concordancia superior a 95%. En el análisis intraexaminador, ambos métodos también se demostraron reproductibles y confiables con alta concordancia. Al comparar la concordancia entre las clases de los examinadores, cuanto mayor el nivel de experiencia mayor fue la concordancia entre ambos métodos.CONCLUSIÓN: Tanto el método de Farfan modificado como el de Frobin, pueden ser utilizados de forma confiable para evaluar la altura discal en las radiografías en perfil. Cuanto mayor el nivel de experiencia del examinador, mayor la concordancia entre ambas mediciones.OBJETIVO: Avaliar a confiabilidade e reprodutibilidade dos métodos de Farfan modificado e de Frobin, para aferição da altura radiográfica dos discos intervertebrais lombares, em comparação inter e intraobservadores. MÉTODO: Foram coletadas e digitalizadas imagens radiográficas de seis pacientes em acompanhamento ambulatorial por lombalgia, sendo avaliados cinco discos lombares de cada paciente. As mensurações foram realizadas no software Image Pro Plus versão 6.0, por seis examinadores com diferentes níveis de experiência. RESULTADOS: Ao serem comparados entre si, os métodos demonstraram concordância superior a 95%. Na análise intraexaminadores, ambos também demonstraram ser reprodutíveis e confiáveis com alta concordância. Ao comparar a concordância entre as classes dos examinadores, quanto maior o nível de experiência maior foi a concordância em ambos os métodos. CONCLUSÃO: Tanto o método de Farfan modificado quanto o de Frobin, podem ser utilizados de forma confiável para avaliar a altura discal nas radiografias em perfil. Quanto maior o nível de experiência do examinador, mais alta foi a concordância entre as aferições.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de Medicina Department of Orthopedics and TraumatologyUNIFESP, EPM, Department of Orthopedics and TraumatologySciELOSociedade Brasileira de ColunaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Kanas, MichelLeite, Marcio SquassoniUeta, Renato Hiroshi SalvioniDel Curto, David [UNIFESP]Martins, Délio EulálioWajchenberg, Marcelo [UNIFESP]Puertas, Eduardo Barros [UNIFESP]2015-06-14T13:46:58Z2015-06-14T13:46:58Z2014-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion31-34application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-18512014130100313Coluna/Columna. Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna, v. 13, n. 1, p. 31-34, 2014.10.1590/S1808-18512014130100313S1808-18512014000100031.pdf1808-1851S1808-18512014000100031http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/8266ark:/48912/0013000000q1cengColuna/Columnainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-06T09:51:02Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/8266Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-12-11T19:49:08.207996Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
Comparación de los métodos de Farfan modificado e de Frobin para la medición de la altura del disco intervertebral
Comparação dos métodos de Farfan modificado e de Frobin, para aferição da altura do disco intervertebral
title Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
spellingShingle Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
Kanas, Michel
Intervertebral disc
Intervertebral disc degeneration
Spinal osteochondrosis
Disco intervertebral
Degeneração do disco intervertebral
Osteocondrose da coluna vertebral
title_short Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
title_full Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
title_fullStr Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
title_sort Comparison of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to evaluate the intervertebral disc height
author Kanas, Michel
author_facet Kanas, Michel
Leite, Marcio Squassoni
Ueta, Renato Hiroshi Salvioni
Del Curto, David [UNIFESP]
Martins, Délio Eulálio
Wajchenberg, Marcelo [UNIFESP]
Puertas, Eduardo Barros [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Leite, Marcio Squassoni
Ueta, Renato Hiroshi Salvioni
Del Curto, David [UNIFESP]
Martins, Délio Eulálio
Wajchenberg, Marcelo [UNIFESP]
Puertas, Eduardo Barros [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kanas, Michel
Leite, Marcio Squassoni
Ueta, Renato Hiroshi Salvioni
Del Curto, David [UNIFESP]
Martins, Délio Eulálio
Wajchenberg, Marcelo [UNIFESP]
Puertas, Eduardo Barros [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intervertebral disc
Intervertebral disc degeneration
Spinal osteochondrosis
Disco intervertebral
Degeneração do disco intervertebral
Osteocondrose da coluna vertebral
topic Intervertebral disc
Intervertebral disc degeneration
Spinal osteochondrosis
Disco intervertebral
Degeneração do disco intervertebral
Osteocondrose da coluna vertebral
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of Farfan modified and Frobin methods to measure the intervertebral disc height in radiographs with inter- and intraobserver comparison. METHOD: Six radiographs of different patients treated for low back pain have been collected and digitized, and five lumbar disc of each patient were evaluated by six examiners with different levels of experience. The measures were done in Image Pro Plus 6.0 software. RESULTS: When compared, both methods showed more than 95% concordance. In intraexaminer analysis, both also shown to be reliable and reproducible, with a high level of concordance. By comparing the correlation between classes of examiners, the higher the level of experience, the greater the agreement for both methods. CONCLUSION: Farfan modified and Frobin are reliable methods to measure the disc height in the lateral radiographs. The higher level of experience of the examiner, the higher was the correlation between measurements.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-03-01
2015-06-14T13:46:58Z
2015-06-14T13:46:58Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-18512014130100313
Coluna/Columna. Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna, v. 13, n. 1, p. 31-34, 2014.
10.1590/S1808-18512014130100313
S1808-18512014000100031.pdf
1808-1851
S1808-18512014000100031
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/8266
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/48912/0013000000q1c
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-18512014130100313
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/8266
identifier_str_mv Coluna/Columna. Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna, v. 13, n. 1, p. 31-34, 2014.
10.1590/S1808-18512014130100313
S1808-18512014000100031.pdf
1808-1851
S1808-18512014000100031
ark:/48912/0013000000q1c
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 31-34
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1818602377353101312

Registros relacionados