Risks and benefits of colonoscopy in patients aged 80 and older: a prospective study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,Edson Jurado da
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632013000200075
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: this study aims to compare colonoscopy results in patients aged 50-79 and those aged 80 and older. PATIENTS AND METHODS: a total of 533 diagnostic colonoscopies performed from August 2011 to January 2012 were evaluated in a prospective study analyzing age, ASA classification, comorbidities, endoscopic findings, time to reach the cecum, number of complete examinations, difficulties and complications. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical data whereas Student's t test to compare means. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: 479 patients were in Group A - age 50 to 79, whereas 54 were in Group B, 80 versus older. The following results are shown for Group A and B, respectively: age 63 ± 8 versus 84 ± 4 years. ASA 1 difficult examination: 58 (21 %) versus 12 (27%) p > 0.05, ASA > 2 difficult examination: 41 (20%) versus 6 (60%) p < 0,05. Comorbidities 255 (53%) versus 36 (66%) p > 0.05. Complete colonoscopy in 450 (94%) versus 45 (83%), p < 0.01. Difficulties in 99 (20%) versus 32 (40%), p < 0.01. Complications in 1 (0.2%) versus 3 (5%) p < 0.01. Diverticulitis/ sequelae in 3 (0.6%) versus 3 (5%) p < 0.01. CRC in 42 (8.7%) and 10 (18.5%), p < 0.05. Adenoma in 130 (27 %) versus 15 (27%), p > 0.05 Time to reach the cecum was 39 ± 10 minutes for difficult procedures and 13 ± 9 for the easy ones. CONCLUSION: age 80 and older is associated with more adverse events during colonoscopy.
id SBCP-1_c5088526808d40315318660d5c0307a1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2237-93632013000200075
network_acronym_str SBCP-1
network_name_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Risks and benefits of colonoscopy in patients aged 80 and older: a prospective studyColonoscopyRisksComplicationsOlder ageElderly OBJECTIVE: this study aims to compare colonoscopy results in patients aged 50-79 and those aged 80 and older. PATIENTS AND METHODS: a total of 533 diagnostic colonoscopies performed from August 2011 to January 2012 were evaluated in a prospective study analyzing age, ASA classification, comorbidities, endoscopic findings, time to reach the cecum, number of complete examinations, difficulties and complications. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical data whereas Student's t test to compare means. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: 479 patients were in Group A - age 50 to 79, whereas 54 were in Group B, 80 versus older. The following results are shown for Group A and B, respectively: age 63 ± 8 versus 84 ± 4 years. ASA 1 difficult examination: 58 (21 %) versus 12 (27%) p > 0.05, ASA > 2 difficult examination: 41 (20%) versus 6 (60%) p < 0,05. Comorbidities 255 (53%) versus 36 (66%) p > 0.05. Complete colonoscopy in 450 (94%) versus 45 (83%), p < 0.01. Difficulties in 99 (20%) versus 32 (40%), p < 0.01. Complications in 1 (0.2%) versus 3 (5%) p < 0.01. Diverticulitis/ sequelae in 3 (0.6%) versus 3 (5%) p < 0.01. CRC in 42 (8.7%) and 10 (18.5%), p < 0.05. Adenoma in 130 (27 %) versus 15 (27%), p > 0.05 Time to reach the cecum was 39 ± 10 minutes for difficult procedures and 13 ± 9 for the easy ones. CONCLUSION: age 80 and older is associated with more adverse events during colonoscopy. Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia2013-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632013000200075Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.33 n.2 2013reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)instacron:SBCP10.1590/S2237-93632013000200006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Edson Jurado daeng2015-07-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-93632013000200075Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-9363&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcp@sbcp.org.br2317-64232237-9363opendoar:2015-07-24T00:00Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Risks and benefits of colonoscopy in patients aged 80 and older: a prospective study
title Risks and benefits of colonoscopy in patients aged 80 and older: a prospective study
spellingShingle Risks and benefits of colonoscopy in patients aged 80 and older: a prospective study
Silva,Edson Jurado da
Colonoscopy
Risks
Complications
Older age
Elderly
title_short Risks and benefits of colonoscopy in patients aged 80 and older: a prospective study
title_full Risks and benefits of colonoscopy in patients aged 80 and older: a prospective study
title_fullStr Risks and benefits of colonoscopy in patients aged 80 and older: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Risks and benefits of colonoscopy in patients aged 80 and older: a prospective study
title_sort Risks and benefits of colonoscopy in patients aged 80 and older: a prospective study
author Silva,Edson Jurado da
author_facet Silva,Edson Jurado da
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,Edson Jurado da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Colonoscopy
Risks
Complications
Older age
Elderly
topic Colonoscopy
Risks
Complications
Older age
Elderly
description OBJECTIVE: this study aims to compare colonoscopy results in patients aged 50-79 and those aged 80 and older. PATIENTS AND METHODS: a total of 533 diagnostic colonoscopies performed from August 2011 to January 2012 were evaluated in a prospective study analyzing age, ASA classification, comorbidities, endoscopic findings, time to reach the cecum, number of complete examinations, difficulties and complications. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical data whereas Student's t test to compare means. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: 479 patients were in Group A - age 50 to 79, whereas 54 were in Group B, 80 versus older. The following results are shown for Group A and B, respectively: age 63 ± 8 versus 84 ± 4 years. ASA 1 difficult examination: 58 (21 %) versus 12 (27%) p > 0.05, ASA > 2 difficult examination: 41 (20%) versus 6 (60%) p < 0,05. Comorbidities 255 (53%) versus 36 (66%) p > 0.05. Complete colonoscopy in 450 (94%) versus 45 (83%), p < 0.01. Difficulties in 99 (20%) versus 32 (40%), p < 0.01. Complications in 1 (0.2%) versus 3 (5%) p < 0.01. Diverticulitis/ sequelae in 3 (0.6%) versus 3 (5%) p < 0.01. CRC in 42 (8.7%) and 10 (18.5%), p < 0.05. Adenoma in 130 (27 %) versus 15 (27%), p > 0.05 Time to reach the cecum was 39 ± 10 minutes for difficult procedures and 13 ± 9 for the easy ones. CONCLUSION: age 80 and older is associated with more adverse events during colonoscopy.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632013000200075
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632013000200075
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S2237-93632013000200006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.33 n.2 2013
reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron:SBCP
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron_str SBCP
institution SBCP
reponame_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
collection Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbcp@sbcp.org.br
_version_ 1752126477375111168