Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva,C.M.M.
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Ferreira,L.R., Ferreira,F.A., Miranda,G.V.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Planta daninha (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582004000400015
Resumo: Imazapyr has presented excellent results in controlling coppices in stand reforms of eucalypt forests, despite differences in the efficacy levels. To find out whether these different responses are caused by the genetic variability of the cultivated materials, two experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions with different imazapyr doses in a hydroponic system in plastic vases containing 2,500 mL solution. The clones IEF-1 (Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid), GE 463 (E. urophylla x E. grandis), and MN 445 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) were used in the first assay, and IEF-1, IEF2 (E. grandis x E. urophylla) x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) and the clones 129 and 7182 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrids) in the second assay. Thirty days after transplanting the seedlings to a nutritive solution, imazapyr was applied to the solution at doses of 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.60 and 3.20 muL L-1. Clone GE 463 proved to be more tolerant to imazapyr than clones IEF-1 and MN 445 in the first assay; however, in the second, clone 7182 was the most tolerant. Thus, doses should also be differentiated when controlling coppices, according to the cultivated clone.
id SBCPD-1_1c4faa8d8bdc134604e8625d5b2a5031
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-83582004000400015
network_acronym_str SBCPD-1
network_name_str Planta daninha (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solutionChopper NAEucalyptus grandisE. urophyllaherbicidedose-responseImazapyr has presented excellent results in controlling coppices in stand reforms of eucalypt forests, despite differences in the efficacy levels. To find out whether these different responses are caused by the genetic variability of the cultivated materials, two experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions with different imazapyr doses in a hydroponic system in plastic vases containing 2,500 mL solution. The clones IEF-1 (Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid), GE 463 (E. urophylla x E. grandis), and MN 445 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) were used in the first assay, and IEF-1, IEF2 (E. grandis x E. urophylla) x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) and the clones 129 and 7182 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrids) in the second assay. Thirty days after transplanting the seedlings to a nutritive solution, imazapyr was applied to the solution at doses of 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.60 and 3.20 muL L-1. Clone GE 463 proved to be more tolerant to imazapyr than clones IEF-1 and MN 445 in the first assay; however, in the second, clone 7182 was the most tolerant. Thus, doses should also be differentiated when controlling coppices, according to the cultivated clone.Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas 2004-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582004000400015Planta Daninha v.22 n.4 2004reponame:Planta daninha (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)instacron:SBCPD10.1590/S0100-83582004000400015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,C.M.M.Ferreira,L.R.Ferreira,F.A.Miranda,G.V.eng2005-03-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-83582004000400015Revistahttp://revistas.cpd.ufv.br/pdaninhaweb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rpdaninha@gmail.com1806-96810100-8358opendoar:2005-03-15T00:00Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
title Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
spellingShingle Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
Silva,C.M.M.
Chopper NA
Eucalyptus grandis
E. urophylla
herbicide
dose-response
title_short Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
title_full Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
title_fullStr Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
title_full_unstemmed Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
title_sort Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
author Silva,C.M.M.
author_facet Silva,C.M.M.
Ferreira,L.R.
Ferreira,F.A.
Miranda,G.V.
author_role author
author2 Ferreira,L.R.
Ferreira,F.A.
Miranda,G.V.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva,C.M.M.
Ferreira,L.R.
Ferreira,F.A.
Miranda,G.V.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chopper NA
Eucalyptus grandis
E. urophylla
herbicide
dose-response
topic Chopper NA
Eucalyptus grandis
E. urophylla
herbicide
dose-response
description Imazapyr has presented excellent results in controlling coppices in stand reforms of eucalypt forests, despite differences in the efficacy levels. To find out whether these different responses are caused by the genetic variability of the cultivated materials, two experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions with different imazapyr doses in a hydroponic system in plastic vases containing 2,500 mL solution. The clones IEF-1 (Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid), GE 463 (E. urophylla x E. grandis), and MN 445 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) were used in the first assay, and IEF-1, IEF2 (E. grandis x E. urophylla) x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) and the clones 129 and 7182 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrids) in the second assay. Thirty days after transplanting the seedlings to a nutritive solution, imazapyr was applied to the solution at doses of 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.60 and 3.20 muL L-1. Clone GE 463 proved to be more tolerant to imazapyr than clones IEF-1 and MN 445 in the first assay; however, in the second, clone 7182 was the most tolerant. Thus, doses should also be differentiated when controlling coppices, according to the cultivated clone.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582004000400015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582004000400015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-83582004000400015
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha v.22 n.4 2004
reponame:Planta daninha (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron:SBCPD
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron_str SBCPD
institution SBCPD
reponame_str Planta daninha (Online)
collection Planta daninha (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rpdaninha@gmail.com
_version_ 1752126489941245952