Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2004 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Planta daninha (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582004000400015 |
Resumo: | Imazapyr has presented excellent results in controlling coppices in stand reforms of eucalypt forests, despite differences in the efficacy levels. To find out whether these different responses are caused by the genetic variability of the cultivated materials, two experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions with different imazapyr doses in a hydroponic system in plastic vases containing 2,500 mL solution. The clones IEF-1 (Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid), GE 463 (E. urophylla x E. grandis), and MN 445 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) were used in the first assay, and IEF-1, IEF2 (E. grandis x E. urophylla) x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) and the clones 129 and 7182 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrids) in the second assay. Thirty days after transplanting the seedlings to a nutritive solution, imazapyr was applied to the solution at doses of 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.60 and 3.20 muL L-1. Clone GE 463 proved to be more tolerant to imazapyr than clones IEF-1 and MN 445 in the first assay; however, in the second, clone 7182 was the most tolerant. Thus, doses should also be differentiated when controlling coppices, according to the cultivated clone. |
id |
SBCPD-1_1c4faa8d8bdc134604e8625d5b2a5031 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-83582004000400015 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCPD-1 |
network_name_str |
Planta daninha (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solutionChopper NAEucalyptus grandisE. urophyllaherbicidedose-responseImazapyr has presented excellent results in controlling coppices in stand reforms of eucalypt forests, despite differences in the efficacy levels. To find out whether these different responses are caused by the genetic variability of the cultivated materials, two experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions with different imazapyr doses in a hydroponic system in plastic vases containing 2,500 mL solution. The clones IEF-1 (Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid), GE 463 (E. urophylla x E. grandis), and MN 445 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) were used in the first assay, and IEF-1, IEF2 (E. grandis x E. urophylla) x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) and the clones 129 and 7182 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrids) in the second assay. Thirty days after transplanting the seedlings to a nutritive solution, imazapyr was applied to the solution at doses of 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.60 and 3.20 muL L-1. Clone GE 463 proved to be more tolerant to imazapyr than clones IEF-1 and MN 445 in the first assay; however, in the second, clone 7182 was the most tolerant. Thus, doses should also be differentiated when controlling coppices, according to the cultivated clone.Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas 2004-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582004000400015Planta Daninha v.22 n.4 2004reponame:Planta daninha (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)instacron:SBCPD10.1590/S0100-83582004000400015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,C.M.M.Ferreira,L.R.Ferreira,F.A.Miranda,G.V.eng2005-03-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-83582004000400015Revistahttp://revistas.cpd.ufv.br/pdaninhaweb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rpdaninha@gmail.com1806-96810100-8358opendoar:2005-03-15T00:00Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution |
title |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution |
spellingShingle |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution Silva,C.M.M. Chopper NA Eucalyptus grandis E. urophylla herbicide dose-response |
title_short |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution |
title_full |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution |
title_fullStr |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution |
title_sort |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution |
author |
Silva,C.M.M. |
author_facet |
Silva,C.M.M. Ferreira,L.R. Ferreira,F.A. Miranda,G.V. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira,L.R. Ferreira,F.A. Miranda,G.V. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva,C.M.M. Ferreira,L.R. Ferreira,F.A. Miranda,G.V. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Chopper NA Eucalyptus grandis E. urophylla herbicide dose-response |
topic |
Chopper NA Eucalyptus grandis E. urophylla herbicide dose-response |
description |
Imazapyr has presented excellent results in controlling coppices in stand reforms of eucalypt forests, despite differences in the efficacy levels. To find out whether these different responses are caused by the genetic variability of the cultivated materials, two experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions with different imazapyr doses in a hydroponic system in plastic vases containing 2,500 mL solution. The clones IEF-1 (Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid), GE 463 (E. urophylla x E. grandis), and MN 445 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) were used in the first assay, and IEF-1, IEF2 (E. grandis x E. urophylla) x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) and the clones 129 and 7182 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrids) in the second assay. Thirty days after transplanting the seedlings to a nutritive solution, imazapyr was applied to the solution at doses of 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.60 and 3.20 muL L-1. Clone GE 463 proved to be more tolerant to imazapyr than clones IEF-1 and MN 445 in the first assay; however, in the second, clone 7182 was the most tolerant. Thus, doses should also be differentiated when controlling coppices, according to the cultivated clone. |
publishDate |
2004 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2004-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582004000400015 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582004000400015 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0100-83582004000400015 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Planta Daninha v.22 n.4 2004 reponame:Planta daninha (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD) instacron:SBCPD |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD) |
instacron_str |
SBCPD |
institution |
SBCPD |
reponame_str |
Planta daninha (Online) |
collection |
Planta daninha (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rpdaninha@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1752126489941245952 |