Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, C.M.M
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Ferreira, L.R., Ferreira, F.A., Miranda, G.V.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582004000400015
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/13572
Resumo: Imazapyr has presented excellent results in controlling coppices in stand reforms of eucalypt forests, despite differences in the efficacy levels. To find out whether these different responses are caused by the genetic variability of the cultivated materials, two experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions with different imazapyr doses in a hydroponic system in plastic vases containing 2,500 mL solution. The clones IEF-1 (Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid), GE 463 (E. urophylla x E. grandis), and MN 445 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) were used in the first assay, and IEF-1, IEF2 (E. grandis x E. urophylla) x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) and the clones 129 and 7182 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrids) in the second assay. Thirty days after transplanting the seedlings to a nutritive solution, imazapyr was applied to the solution at doses of 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.60 and 3.20 mL L-1. Clone GE 463 proved to be more tolerant to imazapyr than clones IEF-1 and MN 445 in the first assay; however, in the second, clone 7182 was the most tolerant. Thus, doses should also be differentiated when controlling coppices, according to the cultivated clone.
id UFV_69a12bb98040152023f24ab9cf5c2171
oai_identifier_str oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/13572
network_acronym_str UFV
network_name_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
repository_id_str 2145
spelling Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solutionChopper NAEucalyptus grandisE. urophyllaHerbicideDose-responseImazapyr has presented excellent results in controlling coppices in stand reforms of eucalypt forests, despite differences in the efficacy levels. To find out whether these different responses are caused by the genetic variability of the cultivated materials, two experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions with different imazapyr doses in a hydroponic system in plastic vases containing 2,500 mL solution. The clones IEF-1 (Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid), GE 463 (E. urophylla x E. grandis), and MN 445 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) were used in the first assay, and IEF-1, IEF2 (E. grandis x E. urophylla) x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) and the clones 129 and 7182 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrids) in the second assay. Thirty days after transplanting the seedlings to a nutritive solution, imazapyr was applied to the solution at doses of 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.60 and 3.20 mL L-1. Clone GE 463 proved to be more tolerant to imazapyr than clones IEF-1 and MN 445 in the first assay; however, in the second, clone 7182 was the most tolerant. Thus, doses should also be differentiated when controlling coppices, according to the cultivated clone.O imazapyr tem apresentado excelentes resultados no controle de brotações na reforma de cultivos florestais com eucalipto, porém têm sido verificados diferentes níveis de eficiência. Com o intuito de averiguar se as diferentes respostas encontradas podem ser devido à variabilidade gênica dos materiais cultivados, foram realizados dois bioensaios em casa de vegetação, utilizando diferentes doses de imazapyr, sob sistema hidropônico (solução de Clark), em vasos plásticos contendo 2.500 ml de solução. No primeiro ensaio trabalhou-se com os clones IEF-1 (híbrido de Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus sp.), GE 463 (E. urophylla x E. grandis) e MN 445 (híbrido de E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp.) e, no segundo , com IEF-1, IEF-2 (híbrido de (E. grandis x E. urophylla) x Eucalyptus sp.) e os clones 129 e 7182 (híbridos de E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp.). Trinta dias após o transplantio das mudas para solução nutritiva, fez-se a aplicação de imazapyr à solução nas doses de 0,00; 0,05; 0,10; 0,20; 0,40; 0,80; 1,60; e 3,20 mL L1. O clone GE 463 mostrou-se mais tolerante ao imazapyr que os clones IEF-1 e MN 445, no primeiro ensaio; já no segundo, o clone 7182 foi mais tolerante. Os clones apresentaram comportamento distinto entre si quanto à presença de imazapyr em solução, indicando que para o controle de rebrota as doses também podem ser diferenciadas, de acordo com o clone cultivado.Planta Daninha2017-11-23T14:43:58Z2017-11-23T14:43:58Z2004-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepdfapplication/pdf1806-9681http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582004000400015http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/13572engv. 22, n. 4, p. 597-606, Oct./Dec. 2004Silva, C.M.MFerreira, L.R.Ferreira, F.A.Miranda, G.V.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFV2024-07-12T08:34:57Zoai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/13572Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452024-07-12T08:34:57LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
title Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
spellingShingle Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
Silva, C.M.M
Chopper NA
Eucalyptus grandis
E. urophylla
Herbicide
Dose-response
title_short Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
title_full Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
title_fullStr Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
title_full_unstemmed Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
title_sort Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
author Silva, C.M.M
author_facet Silva, C.M.M
Ferreira, L.R.
Ferreira, F.A.
Miranda, G.V.
author_role author
author2 Ferreira, L.R.
Ferreira, F.A.
Miranda, G.V.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, C.M.M
Ferreira, L.R.
Ferreira, F.A.
Miranda, G.V.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chopper NA
Eucalyptus grandis
E. urophylla
Herbicide
Dose-response
topic Chopper NA
Eucalyptus grandis
E. urophylla
Herbicide
Dose-response
description Imazapyr has presented excellent results in controlling coppices in stand reforms of eucalypt forests, despite differences in the efficacy levels. To find out whether these different responses are caused by the genetic variability of the cultivated materials, two experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions with different imazapyr doses in a hydroponic system in plastic vases containing 2,500 mL solution. The clones IEF-1 (Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid), GE 463 (E. urophylla x E. grandis), and MN 445 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) were used in the first assay, and IEF-1, IEF2 (E. grandis x E. urophylla) x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) and the clones 129 and 7182 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrids) in the second assay. Thirty days after transplanting the seedlings to a nutritive solution, imazapyr was applied to the solution at doses of 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.60 and 3.20 mL L-1. Clone GE 463 proved to be more tolerant to imazapyr than clones IEF-1 and MN 445 in the first assay; however, in the second, clone 7182 was the most tolerant. Thus, doses should also be differentiated when controlling coppices, according to the cultivated clone.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-12-17
2017-11-23T14:43:58Z
2017-11-23T14:43:58Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 1806-9681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582004000400015
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/13572
identifier_str_mv 1806-9681
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582004000400015
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/13572
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv v. 22, n. 4, p. 597-606, Oct./Dec. 2004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
collection LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
repository.name.fl_str_mv LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fabiojreis@ufv.br
_version_ 1822610731476975616