Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2004 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582004000400015 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/13572 |
Resumo: | Imazapyr has presented excellent results in controlling coppices in stand reforms of eucalypt forests, despite differences in the efficacy levels. To find out whether these different responses are caused by the genetic variability of the cultivated materials, two experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions with different imazapyr doses in a hydroponic system in plastic vases containing 2,500 mL solution. The clones IEF-1 (Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid), GE 463 (E. urophylla x E. grandis), and MN 445 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) were used in the first assay, and IEF-1, IEF2 (E. grandis x E. urophylla) x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) and the clones 129 and 7182 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrids) in the second assay. Thirty days after transplanting the seedlings to a nutritive solution, imazapyr was applied to the solution at doses of 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.60 and 3.20 mL L-1. Clone GE 463 proved to be more tolerant to imazapyr than clones IEF-1 and MN 445 in the first assay; however, in the second, clone 7182 was the most tolerant. Thus, doses should also be differentiated when controlling coppices, according to the cultivated clone. |
id |
UFV_69a12bb98040152023f24ab9cf5c2171 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/13572 |
network_acronym_str |
UFV |
network_name_str |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
repository_id_str |
2145 |
spelling |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solutionChopper NAEucalyptus grandisE. urophyllaHerbicideDose-responseImazapyr has presented excellent results in controlling coppices in stand reforms of eucalypt forests, despite differences in the efficacy levels. To find out whether these different responses are caused by the genetic variability of the cultivated materials, two experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions with different imazapyr doses in a hydroponic system in plastic vases containing 2,500 mL solution. The clones IEF-1 (Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid), GE 463 (E. urophylla x E. grandis), and MN 445 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) were used in the first assay, and IEF-1, IEF2 (E. grandis x E. urophylla) x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) and the clones 129 and 7182 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrids) in the second assay. Thirty days after transplanting the seedlings to a nutritive solution, imazapyr was applied to the solution at doses of 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.60 and 3.20 mL L-1. Clone GE 463 proved to be more tolerant to imazapyr than clones IEF-1 and MN 445 in the first assay; however, in the second, clone 7182 was the most tolerant. Thus, doses should also be differentiated when controlling coppices, according to the cultivated clone.O imazapyr tem apresentado excelentes resultados no controle de brotações na reforma de cultivos florestais com eucalipto, porém têm sido verificados diferentes níveis de eficiência. Com o intuito de averiguar se as diferentes respostas encontradas podem ser devido à variabilidade gênica dos materiais cultivados, foram realizados dois bioensaios em casa de vegetação, utilizando diferentes doses de imazapyr, sob sistema hidropônico (solução de Clark), em vasos plásticos contendo 2.500 ml de solução. No primeiro ensaio trabalhou-se com os clones IEF-1 (híbrido de Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus sp.), GE 463 (E. urophylla x E. grandis) e MN 445 (híbrido de E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp.) e, no segundo , com IEF-1, IEF-2 (híbrido de (E. grandis x E. urophylla) x Eucalyptus sp.) e os clones 129 e 7182 (híbridos de E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp.). Trinta dias após o transplantio das mudas para solução nutritiva, fez-se a aplicação de imazapyr à solução nas doses de 0,00; 0,05; 0,10; 0,20; 0,40; 0,80; 1,60; e 3,20 mL L1. O clone GE 463 mostrou-se mais tolerante ao imazapyr que os clones IEF-1 e MN 445, no primeiro ensaio; já no segundo, o clone 7182 foi mais tolerante. Os clones apresentaram comportamento distinto entre si quanto à presença de imazapyr em solução, indicando que para o controle de rebrota as doses também podem ser diferenciadas, de acordo com o clone cultivado.Planta Daninha2017-11-23T14:43:58Z2017-11-23T14:43:58Z2004-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepdfapplication/pdf1806-9681http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582004000400015http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/13572engv. 22, n. 4, p. 597-606, Oct./Dec. 2004Silva, C.M.MFerreira, L.R.Ferreira, F.A.Miranda, G.V.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFV2024-07-12T08:34:57Zoai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/13572Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452024-07-12T08:34:57LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution |
title |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution |
spellingShingle |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution Silva, C.M.M Chopper NA Eucalyptus grandis E. urophylla Herbicide Dose-response |
title_short |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution |
title_full |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution |
title_fullStr |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution |
title_sort |
Tolerance of eucalypt (Eucalyptus spp.) seedlings to imazapyr in nutritive solution |
author |
Silva, C.M.M |
author_facet |
Silva, C.M.M Ferreira, L.R. Ferreira, F.A. Miranda, G.V. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira, L.R. Ferreira, F.A. Miranda, G.V. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, C.M.M Ferreira, L.R. Ferreira, F.A. Miranda, G.V. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Chopper NA Eucalyptus grandis E. urophylla Herbicide Dose-response |
topic |
Chopper NA Eucalyptus grandis E. urophylla Herbicide Dose-response |
description |
Imazapyr has presented excellent results in controlling coppices in stand reforms of eucalypt forests, despite differences in the efficacy levels. To find out whether these different responses are caused by the genetic variability of the cultivated materials, two experiments were carried out under greenhouse conditions with different imazapyr doses in a hydroponic system in plastic vases containing 2,500 mL solution. The clones IEF-1 (Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid), GE 463 (E. urophylla x E. grandis), and MN 445 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) were used in the first assay, and IEF-1, IEF2 (E. grandis x E. urophylla) x Eucalyptus sp. hybrid) and the clones 129 and 7182 (E. grandis x Eucalyptus sp. hybrids) in the second assay. Thirty days after transplanting the seedlings to a nutritive solution, imazapyr was applied to the solution at doses of 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.60 and 3.20 mL L-1. Clone GE 463 proved to be more tolerant to imazapyr than clones IEF-1 and MN 445 in the first assay; however, in the second, clone 7182 was the most tolerant. Thus, doses should also be differentiated when controlling coppices, according to the cultivated clone. |
publishDate |
2004 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2004-12-17 2017-11-23T14:43:58Z 2017-11-23T14:43:58Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
1806-9681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582004000400015 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/13572 |
identifier_str_mv |
1806-9681 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582004000400015 http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/13572 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
v. 22, n. 4, p. 597-606, Oct./Dec. 2004 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Planta Daninha |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Planta Daninha |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) instacron:UFV |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
instacron_str |
UFV |
institution |
UFV |
reponame_str |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
collection |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
fabiojreis@ufv.br |
_version_ |
1822610731476975616 |