Use of Herbicides in Sugarcane in the São Paulo State
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Planta daninha (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582019000100262 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: Sugarcane is one of the main agricultural cultivations of Brazil, and one of the crops in which herbicides are most applied. In the 2017/2018 season, the estimated sugarcane production was 694.54 million tons, with an estimated increase of 0.9% in yield for this season. In order to evaluate the use of herbicides in this crop in the São Paulo State during a five-year period, a survey was carried out with sugarcane farmers. The use of herbicides applied alone and in a formulated mixture, according to their mechanism of action, were evaluated from 2010 to 2014. Photosystem II inhibitor herbicides were the most used in this period and the total amount of herbicides of almost all mechanism of action increased from 2010 to 2014, except for photosystem I inhibitors herbicides. The use of formulated mixtures also increased during this period. The area treated with carotenoid biosynthesis and photosystem II inhibitor herbicides was the largest for the control of monocotyledonous species (Poaceae, Cyperaceae and Commelinaceae). In relation to the dicotyledonous species, the area treated with PROTOX inhibitor herbicides was the largest in all evaluated years. |
id |
SBCPD-1_9adb5050f96abffa624748376a8c10a1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-83582019000100262 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCPD-1 |
network_name_str |
Planta daninha (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Use of Herbicides in Sugarcane in the São Paulo Statemarketingmechanism of actionresearchpesticidesSaccharum officinarumABSTRACT: Sugarcane is one of the main agricultural cultivations of Brazil, and one of the crops in which herbicides are most applied. In the 2017/2018 season, the estimated sugarcane production was 694.54 million tons, with an estimated increase of 0.9% in yield for this season. In order to evaluate the use of herbicides in this crop in the São Paulo State during a five-year period, a survey was carried out with sugarcane farmers. The use of herbicides applied alone and in a formulated mixture, according to their mechanism of action, were evaluated from 2010 to 2014. Photosystem II inhibitor herbicides were the most used in this period and the total amount of herbicides of almost all mechanism of action increased from 2010 to 2014, except for photosystem I inhibitors herbicides. The use of formulated mixtures also increased during this period. The area treated with carotenoid biosynthesis and photosystem II inhibitor herbicides was the largest for the control of monocotyledonous species (Poaceae, Cyperaceae and Commelinaceae). In relation to the dicotyledonous species, the area treated with PROTOX inhibitor herbicides was the largest in all evaluated years.Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas 2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582019000100262Planta Daninha v.37 2019reponame:Planta daninha (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)instacron:SBCPD10.1590/s0100-83582019370100064info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessREIS,F.C.VICTÓRIA FILHO,R.ANDRADE,M.T.BARROSO,A.A.M.eng2019-08-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-83582019000100262Revistahttp://revistas.cpd.ufv.br/pdaninhaweb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rpdaninha@gmail.com1806-96810100-8358opendoar:2019-08-15T00:00Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Use of Herbicides in Sugarcane in the São Paulo State |
title |
Use of Herbicides in Sugarcane in the São Paulo State |
spellingShingle |
Use of Herbicides in Sugarcane in the São Paulo State REIS,F.C. marketing mechanism of action research pesticides Saccharum officinarum |
title_short |
Use of Herbicides in Sugarcane in the São Paulo State |
title_full |
Use of Herbicides in Sugarcane in the São Paulo State |
title_fullStr |
Use of Herbicides in Sugarcane in the São Paulo State |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of Herbicides in Sugarcane in the São Paulo State |
title_sort |
Use of Herbicides in Sugarcane in the São Paulo State |
author |
REIS,F.C. |
author_facet |
REIS,F.C. VICTÓRIA FILHO,R. ANDRADE,M.T. BARROSO,A.A.M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
VICTÓRIA FILHO,R. ANDRADE,M.T. BARROSO,A.A.M. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
REIS,F.C. VICTÓRIA FILHO,R. ANDRADE,M.T. BARROSO,A.A.M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
marketing mechanism of action research pesticides Saccharum officinarum |
topic |
marketing mechanism of action research pesticides Saccharum officinarum |
description |
ABSTRACT: Sugarcane is one of the main agricultural cultivations of Brazil, and one of the crops in which herbicides are most applied. In the 2017/2018 season, the estimated sugarcane production was 694.54 million tons, with an estimated increase of 0.9% in yield for this season. In order to evaluate the use of herbicides in this crop in the São Paulo State during a five-year period, a survey was carried out with sugarcane farmers. The use of herbicides applied alone and in a formulated mixture, according to their mechanism of action, were evaluated from 2010 to 2014. Photosystem II inhibitor herbicides were the most used in this period and the total amount of herbicides of almost all mechanism of action increased from 2010 to 2014, except for photosystem I inhibitors herbicides. The use of formulated mixtures also increased during this period. The area treated with carotenoid biosynthesis and photosystem II inhibitor herbicides was the largest for the control of monocotyledonous species (Poaceae, Cyperaceae and Commelinaceae). In relation to the dicotyledonous species, the area treated with PROTOX inhibitor herbicides was the largest in all evaluated years. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582019000100262 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582019000100262 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s0100-83582019370100064 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Planta Daninha v.37 2019 reponame:Planta daninha (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD) instacron:SBCPD |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD) |
instacron_str |
SBCPD |
institution |
SBCPD |
reponame_str |
Planta daninha (Online) |
collection |
Planta daninha (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rpdaninha@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1752126496928956416 |