Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Planta daninha (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582016000100099 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to evaluate the initial growth and the physiological characteristics of eucalypt submitted to different managements of signalgrass. The experiment was conducted in a protected environment, using a randomized blocks design with five repetitions. The treatments were arranged in a (5 x 2) + 1 factorial design, and the first factor corresponded to the types of weed management (no control; chemical control keeping the signalgrass shoot on the soil; chemical control with removal of the signalgrass shoot; mechanical control keeping the signalgrass shoot on the soil, and mechanical control with removal of the signalgrass shoot); the second factor corresponded to the two weeds species (U. brizantha and U. decumbens) and a control relative to the eucalypt in monoculture. The eucalypt growth was not affected by the presence of the Urochloa species until 50 days after treatments (DAT). However, the coexistence of these species with eucalypt for 107 DAT reduced the collar diameter, total dry matter, and the leaf area, but did not alter the characteristics related to photosynthesis and transpiration. The control method adopted, with removal or maintenance of the signalgrass shoot, regardless of species, did not change the initial eucalypt growth. It can be concluded that the coexistence of eucalypt with Urochloa decumbens or Urochloa brizantha for 105 days reduces the eucalypt growth. However, the use of chemical or mechanical control, with or without removal of signalgrass residue, were effective methods to prevent interference of these weeds. |
id |
SBCPD-1_9f59a763b5484c90d5a800c8a19a8abb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-83582016000100099 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCPD-1 |
network_name_str |
Planta daninha (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp.control methodsphysiological variablesinitial growthUrochloa (syn. Brachiaria)eucalyptThe objective of this work was to evaluate the initial growth and the physiological characteristics of eucalypt submitted to different managements of signalgrass. The experiment was conducted in a protected environment, using a randomized blocks design with five repetitions. The treatments were arranged in a (5 x 2) + 1 factorial design, and the first factor corresponded to the types of weed management (no control; chemical control keeping the signalgrass shoot on the soil; chemical control with removal of the signalgrass shoot; mechanical control keeping the signalgrass shoot on the soil, and mechanical control with removal of the signalgrass shoot); the second factor corresponded to the two weeds species (U. brizantha and U. decumbens) and a control relative to the eucalypt in monoculture. The eucalypt growth was not affected by the presence of the Urochloa species until 50 days after treatments (DAT). However, the coexistence of these species with eucalypt for 107 DAT reduced the collar diameter, total dry matter, and the leaf area, but did not alter the characteristics related to photosynthesis and transpiration. The control method adopted, with removal or maintenance of the signalgrass shoot, regardless of species, did not change the initial eucalypt growth. It can be concluded that the coexistence of eucalypt with Urochloa decumbens or Urochloa brizantha for 105 days reduces the eucalypt growth. However, the use of chemical or mechanical control, with or without removal of signalgrass residue, were effective methods to prevent interference of these weeds.Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas 2016-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582016000100099Planta Daninha v.34 n.1 2016reponame:Planta daninha (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)instacron:SBCPD10.1590/S0100-83582016340100010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFERREIRA,G.L.SARAIVA,D.T.QUEIROZ,G.P.SILVA,D.V.PEREIRA,G.A.M.FERREIRA,L.R.OLIVEIRA NETO,S.N.MATTIELLO,E.M.eng2016-03-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-83582016000100099Revistahttp://revistas.cpd.ufv.br/pdaninhaweb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rpdaninha@gmail.com1806-96810100-8358opendoar:2016-03-28T00:00Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp. |
title |
Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp. |
spellingShingle |
Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp. FERREIRA,G.L. control methods physiological variables initial growth Urochloa (syn. Brachiaria) eucalypt |
title_short |
Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp. |
title_full |
Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp. |
title_fullStr |
Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp. |
title_sort |
Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp. |
author |
FERREIRA,G.L. |
author_facet |
FERREIRA,G.L. SARAIVA,D.T. QUEIROZ,G.P. SILVA,D.V. PEREIRA,G.A.M. FERREIRA,L.R. OLIVEIRA NETO,S.N. MATTIELLO,E.M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
SARAIVA,D.T. QUEIROZ,G.P. SILVA,D.V. PEREIRA,G.A.M. FERREIRA,L.R. OLIVEIRA NETO,S.N. MATTIELLO,E.M. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
FERREIRA,G.L. SARAIVA,D.T. QUEIROZ,G.P. SILVA,D.V. PEREIRA,G.A.M. FERREIRA,L.R. OLIVEIRA NETO,S.N. MATTIELLO,E.M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
control methods physiological variables initial growth Urochloa (syn. Brachiaria) eucalypt |
topic |
control methods physiological variables initial growth Urochloa (syn. Brachiaria) eucalypt |
description |
The objective of this work was to evaluate the initial growth and the physiological characteristics of eucalypt submitted to different managements of signalgrass. The experiment was conducted in a protected environment, using a randomized blocks design with five repetitions. The treatments were arranged in a (5 x 2) + 1 factorial design, and the first factor corresponded to the types of weed management (no control; chemical control keeping the signalgrass shoot on the soil; chemical control with removal of the signalgrass shoot; mechanical control keeping the signalgrass shoot on the soil, and mechanical control with removal of the signalgrass shoot); the second factor corresponded to the two weeds species (U. brizantha and U. decumbens) and a control relative to the eucalypt in monoculture. The eucalypt growth was not affected by the presence of the Urochloa species until 50 days after treatments (DAT). However, the coexistence of these species with eucalypt for 107 DAT reduced the collar diameter, total dry matter, and the leaf area, but did not alter the characteristics related to photosynthesis and transpiration. The control method adopted, with removal or maintenance of the signalgrass shoot, regardless of species, did not change the initial eucalypt growth. It can be concluded that the coexistence of eucalypt with Urochloa decumbens or Urochloa brizantha for 105 days reduces the eucalypt growth. However, the use of chemical or mechanical control, with or without removal of signalgrass residue, were effective methods to prevent interference of these weeds. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582016000100099 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582016000100099 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0100-83582016340100010 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Planta Daninha v.34 n.1 2016 reponame:Planta daninha (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD) instacron:SBCPD |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD) |
instacron_str |
SBCPD |
institution |
SBCPD |
reponame_str |
Planta daninha (Online) |
collection |
Planta daninha (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rpdaninha@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1752126494846484480 |