Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: FERREIRA,G.L.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: SARAIVA,D.T., QUEIROZ,G.P., SILVA,D.V., PEREIRA,G.A.M., FERREIRA,L.R., OLIVEIRA NETO,S.N., MATTIELLO,E.M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Planta daninha (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582016000100099
Resumo: The objective of this work was to evaluate the initial growth and the physiological characteristics of eucalypt submitted to different managements of signalgrass. The experiment was conducted in a protected environment, using a randomized blocks design with five repetitions. The treatments were arranged in a (5 x 2) + 1 factorial design, and the first factor corresponded to the types of weed management (no control; chemical control keeping the signalgrass shoot on the soil; chemical control with removal of the signalgrass shoot; mechanical control keeping the signalgrass shoot on the soil, and mechanical control with removal of the signalgrass shoot); the second factor corresponded to the two weeds species (U. brizantha and U. decumbens) and a control relative to the eucalypt in monoculture. The eucalypt growth was not affected by the presence of the Urochloa species until 50 days after treatments (DAT). However, the coexistence of these species with eucalypt for 107 DAT reduced the collar diameter, total dry matter, and the leaf area, but did not alter the characteristics related to photosynthesis and transpiration. The control method adopted, with removal or maintenance of the signalgrass shoot, regardless of species, did not change the initial eucalypt growth. It can be concluded that the coexistence of eucalypt with Urochloa decumbens or Urochloa brizantha for 105 days reduces the eucalypt growth. However, the use of chemical or mechanical control, with or without removal of signalgrass residue, were effective methods to prevent interference of these weeds.
id SBCPD-1_9f59a763b5484c90d5a800c8a19a8abb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-83582016000100099
network_acronym_str SBCPD-1
network_name_str Planta daninha (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp.control methodsphysiological variablesinitial growthUrochloa (syn. Brachiaria)eucalyptThe objective of this work was to evaluate the initial growth and the physiological characteristics of eucalypt submitted to different managements of signalgrass. The experiment was conducted in a protected environment, using a randomized blocks design with five repetitions. The treatments were arranged in a (5 x 2) + 1 factorial design, and the first factor corresponded to the types of weed management (no control; chemical control keeping the signalgrass shoot on the soil; chemical control with removal of the signalgrass shoot; mechanical control keeping the signalgrass shoot on the soil, and mechanical control with removal of the signalgrass shoot); the second factor corresponded to the two weeds species (U. brizantha and U. decumbens) and a control relative to the eucalypt in monoculture. The eucalypt growth was not affected by the presence of the Urochloa species until 50 days after treatments (DAT). However, the coexistence of these species with eucalypt for 107 DAT reduced the collar diameter, total dry matter, and the leaf area, but did not alter the characteristics related to photosynthesis and transpiration. The control method adopted, with removal or maintenance of the signalgrass shoot, regardless of species, did not change the initial eucalypt growth. It can be concluded that the coexistence of eucalypt with Urochloa decumbens or Urochloa brizantha for 105 days reduces the eucalypt growth. However, the use of chemical or mechanical control, with or without removal of signalgrass residue, were effective methods to prevent interference of these weeds.Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas 2016-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582016000100099Planta Daninha v.34 n.1 2016reponame:Planta daninha (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)instacron:SBCPD10.1590/S0100-83582016340100010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFERREIRA,G.L.SARAIVA,D.T.QUEIROZ,G.P.SILVA,D.V.PEREIRA,G.A.M.FERREIRA,L.R.OLIVEIRA NETO,S.N.MATTIELLO,E.M.eng2016-03-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-83582016000100099Revistahttp://revistas.cpd.ufv.br/pdaninhaweb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rpdaninha@gmail.com1806-96810100-8358opendoar:2016-03-28T00:00Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp.
title Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp.
spellingShingle Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp.
FERREIRA,G.L.
control methods
physiological variables
initial growth
Urochloa (syn. Brachiaria)
eucalypt
title_short Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp.
title_full Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp.
title_fullStr Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp.
title_full_unstemmed Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp.
title_sort Eucalypt Growth Submitted to Management of Urochloa spp.
author FERREIRA,G.L.
author_facet FERREIRA,G.L.
SARAIVA,D.T.
QUEIROZ,G.P.
SILVA,D.V.
PEREIRA,G.A.M.
FERREIRA,L.R.
OLIVEIRA NETO,S.N.
MATTIELLO,E.M.
author_role author
author2 SARAIVA,D.T.
QUEIROZ,G.P.
SILVA,D.V.
PEREIRA,G.A.M.
FERREIRA,L.R.
OLIVEIRA NETO,S.N.
MATTIELLO,E.M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv FERREIRA,G.L.
SARAIVA,D.T.
QUEIROZ,G.P.
SILVA,D.V.
PEREIRA,G.A.M.
FERREIRA,L.R.
OLIVEIRA NETO,S.N.
MATTIELLO,E.M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv control methods
physiological variables
initial growth
Urochloa (syn. Brachiaria)
eucalypt
topic control methods
physiological variables
initial growth
Urochloa (syn. Brachiaria)
eucalypt
description The objective of this work was to evaluate the initial growth and the physiological characteristics of eucalypt submitted to different managements of signalgrass. The experiment was conducted in a protected environment, using a randomized blocks design with five repetitions. The treatments were arranged in a (5 x 2) + 1 factorial design, and the first factor corresponded to the types of weed management (no control; chemical control keeping the signalgrass shoot on the soil; chemical control with removal of the signalgrass shoot; mechanical control keeping the signalgrass shoot on the soil, and mechanical control with removal of the signalgrass shoot); the second factor corresponded to the two weeds species (U. brizantha and U. decumbens) and a control relative to the eucalypt in monoculture. The eucalypt growth was not affected by the presence of the Urochloa species until 50 days after treatments (DAT). However, the coexistence of these species with eucalypt for 107 DAT reduced the collar diameter, total dry matter, and the leaf area, but did not alter the characteristics related to photosynthesis and transpiration. The control method adopted, with removal or maintenance of the signalgrass shoot, regardless of species, did not change the initial eucalypt growth. It can be concluded that the coexistence of eucalypt with Urochloa decumbens or Urochloa brizantha for 105 days reduces the eucalypt growth. However, the use of chemical or mechanical control, with or without removal of signalgrass residue, were effective methods to prevent interference of these weeds.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582016000100099
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582016000100099
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-83582016340100010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha v.34 n.1 2016
reponame:Planta daninha (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron:SBCPD
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron_str SBCPD
institution SBCPD
reponame_str Planta daninha (Online)
collection Planta daninha (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rpdaninha@gmail.com
_version_ 1752126494846484480