Volatility of Different Formulations of Clomazone Herbicide
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Planta daninha (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582015000200315 |
Resumo: | Volatilization represents an important process in the displacement of pesticides for the environment. The physicochemical properties of the clomazone molecule indicate its relative volatility. Therefore, this study was carried out to assess the volatilization of different clomazone herbicide formulations using bioindicator species. To that end, airtight glass boxes were used with the presence of different clomazone formulations and plant species. The formulations used were Gamit 360 CS(r), Gamit 500 EC(r) and Gamit Star(r). The plant species assessed were maize, sorghum and rice. With the results obtained it is possible to conclude that, among the formulations, Gamit 360 CS(r) has caused less phytotoxicity to the bioindicator species in comparison to the formulations of Gamit 500 EC(r) and Gamit Star(r) formulations. In general, The Gamit 500 EC(r) and Gamit Star(r) have not differed in the phytotoxicity potential for the bioindicator species. |
id |
SBCPD-1_d8e796c11970a67250727db7be58a78c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-83582015000200315 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCPD-1 |
network_name_str |
Planta daninha (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Volatility of Different Formulations of Clomazone HerbicidephytotoxicityGamit(r)volatilizationVolatilization represents an important process in the displacement of pesticides for the environment. The physicochemical properties of the clomazone molecule indicate its relative volatility. Therefore, this study was carried out to assess the volatilization of different clomazone herbicide formulations using bioindicator species. To that end, airtight glass boxes were used with the presence of different clomazone formulations and plant species. The formulations used were Gamit 360 CS(r), Gamit 500 EC(r) and Gamit Star(r). The plant species assessed were maize, sorghum and rice. With the results obtained it is possible to conclude that, among the formulations, Gamit 360 CS(r) has caused less phytotoxicity to the bioindicator species in comparison to the formulations of Gamit 500 EC(r) and Gamit Star(r) formulations. In general, The Gamit 500 EC(r) and Gamit Star(r) have not differed in the phytotoxicity potential for the bioindicator species.Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas 2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582015000200315Planta Daninha v.33 n.2 2015reponame:Planta daninha (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)instacron:SBCPD10.1590/0100-83582015000200017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchreiber,F.Avila,L.A.Scherner,A.Gehrke,V.R.Agostinetto,D.eng2015-07-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-83582015000200315Revistahttp://revistas.cpd.ufv.br/pdaninhaweb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rpdaninha@gmail.com1806-96810100-8358opendoar:2015-07-06T00:00Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Volatility of Different Formulations of Clomazone Herbicide |
title |
Volatility of Different Formulations of Clomazone Herbicide |
spellingShingle |
Volatility of Different Formulations of Clomazone Herbicide Schreiber,F. phytotoxicity Gamit(r) volatilization |
title_short |
Volatility of Different Formulations of Clomazone Herbicide |
title_full |
Volatility of Different Formulations of Clomazone Herbicide |
title_fullStr |
Volatility of Different Formulations of Clomazone Herbicide |
title_full_unstemmed |
Volatility of Different Formulations of Clomazone Herbicide |
title_sort |
Volatility of Different Formulations of Clomazone Herbicide |
author |
Schreiber,F. |
author_facet |
Schreiber,F. Avila,L.A. Scherner,A. Gehrke,V.R. Agostinetto,D. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Avila,L.A. Scherner,A. Gehrke,V.R. Agostinetto,D. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schreiber,F. Avila,L.A. Scherner,A. Gehrke,V.R. Agostinetto,D. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
phytotoxicity Gamit(r) volatilization |
topic |
phytotoxicity Gamit(r) volatilization |
description |
Volatilization represents an important process in the displacement of pesticides for the environment. The physicochemical properties of the clomazone molecule indicate its relative volatility. Therefore, this study was carried out to assess the volatilization of different clomazone herbicide formulations using bioindicator species. To that end, airtight glass boxes were used with the presence of different clomazone formulations and plant species. The formulations used were Gamit 360 CS(r), Gamit 500 EC(r) and Gamit Star(r). The plant species assessed were maize, sorghum and rice. With the results obtained it is possible to conclude that, among the formulations, Gamit 360 CS(r) has caused less phytotoxicity to the bioindicator species in comparison to the formulations of Gamit 500 EC(r) and Gamit Star(r) formulations. In general, The Gamit 500 EC(r) and Gamit Star(r) have not differed in the phytotoxicity potential for the bioindicator species. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582015000200315 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582015000200315 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-83582015000200017 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Planta Daninha v.33 n.2 2015 reponame:Planta daninha (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD) instacron:SBCPD |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD) |
instacron_str |
SBCPD |
institution |
SBCPD |
reponame_str |
Planta daninha (Online) |
collection |
Planta daninha (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rpdaninha@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1752126494739529728 |