Nutrient and Organic Carbon Losses, Enrichment Rate, and Cost of Water Erosion

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bertol,Ildegardis
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Luciano,Rodrigo Vieira, Bertol,Camilo, Bagio,Bárbara
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832017000100506
Resumo: ABSTRACT Soil erosion from water causes loss of nutrients and organic carbon, enriches the environment outside the erosion site, and results in costs. The no-tillage system generates increased nutrient and C content in the topsoil and, although it controls erosion, it can produce a more enriched runoff than in the conventional tillage system. This study was conducted in a Humic Cambisol in natural rainfall from 1997 to 2012 to quantify the contents and total losses of nutrients and organic C in soil runoff, and to calculate the enrichment rates and the cost of these losses. The treatments evaluated were: a) soil with a crop, consisting of conventional tillage with one plowing + two harrowings (CT), minimum tillage with one chisel plowing + one harrowing (MT), and no tillage (NT); and b) bare soil: one plowing + two harrowings (BS). In CT, MT, and NT, black oat, soybean, vetch, corn, turnip, and black beans were cultivated. Over the 15 years, 15.5 Mg ha-1 of limestone, 525 kg ha-1 of N (urea), 1,302 kg ha-1 of P2O5 (triple superphosphate), and 1,075 kg ha-1 of K2O (potassium chloride) were used in the soil. The P, K, Ca, Mg, and organic C contents in the soil were determined and also the P, K, Ca, and Mg sediments in the runoff water. From these contents, the total losses, the enrichment rates (ER), and financial losses were calculated. The NT increased the P, K, and organic C contents in the topsoil. The nutrients and organic C content in the runoff from NT was greater than from CT, showing that NT was not a fully conservationist practice for soil. The linear model y = a + bx fit the data within the level of significance (p≤0.01) when the values of P, K, and organic C in the sediments from erosion were related to those values in the soil surface layer. The nutrient and organic C contents were higher in the sediments from erosion than in the soil where the erosion originated, generating values of ER>1 for P, K, and organic C. The value of the total losses of nutrients in the form of triple superphosphate fertilizer, potassium chloride, and urea and limestone by water erosion was higher in CT than in NT. For triple superphosphate, the cost of erosion losses was 29 % higher in NT than in CT, while in urea and limestone, the effectiveness of NT in reducing costs was 65 and 50 %, respectively.
id SBCS-1_62e20afda0895428717bb6aeb0ca5edd
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-06832017000100506
network_acronym_str SBCS-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Nutrient and Organic Carbon Losses, Enrichment Rate, and Cost of Water Erosionsoil erosionsoil and water lossesnutrient lossescost of erosionABSTRACT Soil erosion from water causes loss of nutrients and organic carbon, enriches the environment outside the erosion site, and results in costs. The no-tillage system generates increased nutrient and C content in the topsoil and, although it controls erosion, it can produce a more enriched runoff than in the conventional tillage system. This study was conducted in a Humic Cambisol in natural rainfall from 1997 to 2012 to quantify the contents and total losses of nutrients and organic C in soil runoff, and to calculate the enrichment rates and the cost of these losses. The treatments evaluated were: a) soil with a crop, consisting of conventional tillage with one plowing + two harrowings (CT), minimum tillage with one chisel plowing + one harrowing (MT), and no tillage (NT); and b) bare soil: one plowing + two harrowings (BS). In CT, MT, and NT, black oat, soybean, vetch, corn, turnip, and black beans were cultivated. Over the 15 years, 15.5 Mg ha-1 of limestone, 525 kg ha-1 of N (urea), 1,302 kg ha-1 of P2O5 (triple superphosphate), and 1,075 kg ha-1 of K2O (potassium chloride) were used in the soil. The P, K, Ca, Mg, and organic C contents in the soil were determined and also the P, K, Ca, and Mg sediments in the runoff water. From these contents, the total losses, the enrichment rates (ER), and financial losses were calculated. The NT increased the P, K, and organic C contents in the topsoil. The nutrients and organic C content in the runoff from NT was greater than from CT, showing that NT was not a fully conservationist practice for soil. The linear model y = a + bx fit the data within the level of significance (p≤0.01) when the values of P, K, and organic C in the sediments from erosion were related to those values in the soil surface layer. The nutrient and organic C contents were higher in the sediments from erosion than in the soil where the erosion originated, generating values of ER>1 for P, K, and organic C. The value of the total losses of nutrients in the form of triple superphosphate fertilizer, potassium chloride, and urea and limestone by water erosion was higher in CT than in NT. For triple superphosphate, the cost of erosion losses was 29 % higher in NT than in CT, while in urea and limestone, the effectiveness of NT in reducing costs was 65 and 50 %, respectively.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832017000100506Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo v.41 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)instacron:SBCS10.1590/18069657rbcs20160150info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBertol,IldegardisLuciano,Rodrigo VieiraBertol,CamiloBagio,Bárbaraeng2017-03-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-06832017000100506Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0100-0683&lng=es&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcs@ufv.br1806-96570100-0683opendoar:2017-03-07T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nutrient and Organic Carbon Losses, Enrichment Rate, and Cost of Water Erosion
title Nutrient and Organic Carbon Losses, Enrichment Rate, and Cost of Water Erosion
spellingShingle Nutrient and Organic Carbon Losses, Enrichment Rate, and Cost of Water Erosion
Bertol,Ildegardis
soil erosion
soil and water losses
nutrient losses
cost of erosion
title_short Nutrient and Organic Carbon Losses, Enrichment Rate, and Cost of Water Erosion
title_full Nutrient and Organic Carbon Losses, Enrichment Rate, and Cost of Water Erosion
title_fullStr Nutrient and Organic Carbon Losses, Enrichment Rate, and Cost of Water Erosion
title_full_unstemmed Nutrient and Organic Carbon Losses, Enrichment Rate, and Cost of Water Erosion
title_sort Nutrient and Organic Carbon Losses, Enrichment Rate, and Cost of Water Erosion
author Bertol,Ildegardis
author_facet Bertol,Ildegardis
Luciano,Rodrigo Vieira
Bertol,Camilo
Bagio,Bárbara
author_role author
author2 Luciano,Rodrigo Vieira
Bertol,Camilo
Bagio,Bárbara
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bertol,Ildegardis
Luciano,Rodrigo Vieira
Bertol,Camilo
Bagio,Bárbara
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv soil erosion
soil and water losses
nutrient losses
cost of erosion
topic soil erosion
soil and water losses
nutrient losses
cost of erosion
description ABSTRACT Soil erosion from water causes loss of nutrients and organic carbon, enriches the environment outside the erosion site, and results in costs. The no-tillage system generates increased nutrient and C content in the topsoil and, although it controls erosion, it can produce a more enriched runoff than in the conventional tillage system. This study was conducted in a Humic Cambisol in natural rainfall from 1997 to 2012 to quantify the contents and total losses of nutrients and organic C in soil runoff, and to calculate the enrichment rates and the cost of these losses. The treatments evaluated were: a) soil with a crop, consisting of conventional tillage with one plowing + two harrowings (CT), minimum tillage with one chisel plowing + one harrowing (MT), and no tillage (NT); and b) bare soil: one plowing + two harrowings (BS). In CT, MT, and NT, black oat, soybean, vetch, corn, turnip, and black beans were cultivated. Over the 15 years, 15.5 Mg ha-1 of limestone, 525 kg ha-1 of N (urea), 1,302 kg ha-1 of P2O5 (triple superphosphate), and 1,075 kg ha-1 of K2O (potassium chloride) were used in the soil. The P, K, Ca, Mg, and organic C contents in the soil were determined and also the P, K, Ca, and Mg sediments in the runoff water. From these contents, the total losses, the enrichment rates (ER), and financial losses were calculated. The NT increased the P, K, and organic C contents in the topsoil. The nutrients and organic C content in the runoff from NT was greater than from CT, showing that NT was not a fully conservationist practice for soil. The linear model y = a + bx fit the data within the level of significance (p≤0.01) when the values of P, K, and organic C in the sediments from erosion were related to those values in the soil surface layer. The nutrient and organic C contents were higher in the sediments from erosion than in the soil where the erosion originated, generating values of ER>1 for P, K, and organic C. The value of the total losses of nutrients in the form of triple superphosphate fertilizer, potassium chloride, and urea and limestone by water erosion was higher in CT than in NT. For triple superphosphate, the cost of erosion losses was 29 % higher in NT than in CT, while in urea and limestone, the effectiveness of NT in reducing costs was 65 and 50 %, respectively.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832017000100506
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832017000100506
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/18069657rbcs20160150
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo v.41 2017
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
instacron:SBCS
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
instacron_str SBCS
institution SBCS
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbcs@ufv.br
_version_ 1752126521394331648