Evaluation of traditional methods for estimating lime requirement in Brazilian soils

• Autor(a) principal: Teixeira,Welldy Gonçalves
• Data de Publicação: 2020
• Outros Autores: Alvarez V.,Víctor Hugo, Neves,Júlio César Lima, Paulucio,Rodrigo Bazzarella
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
• Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832020000100527
• topic: lime requirement predictions; soil acidity; comparison between methods; correlation; identity

ABSTRACT The optimal soil pH for most annual crops in Brazil varies between 5.7 and 6.0. Numerous methods have been developed for estimating lime requirement (LR), but they vary widely in their predictions and fail to raise pH to desired values for optimum crop production in the highly weathered soils of Brazil. The objectives of this study were to (i) compare seven traditional methods for estimating LR in Brazilian soils; (ii) assess the effects of LR predicted by these methods on soil-acidity related properties, and (iii) determine if these methods are predicting LR to attain target pH values of 5.8 and 6.0, which are within the pH range recommended to optimize crop yields. The traditional LR methods evaluated in this study are based on the following criteria: exchangeable acidity (EA), base saturation (BSAT), exchangeable acidity along with Ca2+ and Mg2+ as proposed by the 4th (MG4A) and 5th (MG5A) Approximations to the Minas Gerais State, SMP soil-buffer pH (SMP), potential acidity (PA), and soil pH along with organic matter (pHOM). These methods were compared with the standard incubation method using correlation-regression analysis and, alternatively, the identity test designed for assessing equivalence between methods. Representative agricultural soils (n = 22) were incubated for 60 days with incremental amounts of lime determined by the tested methods. On average, LR predictions differed among methods, and increased in the following order: EA < BSAT ≈ MG5A ≤ MG4A ≈ SMP ≤ PA < pHOM. Suitable changes in soil pH, exchangeable acidity, potential acidity, base saturation, and Ca2+ and Mg2+ were achieved upon application of LR estimated by all methods except the EA and pHMO, which resulted in undesirable soil acidity characteristics. All methods evaluated in this study were unable to predict LR for attaining target pH values of 5.8 and 6.0 as revealed by the identity test, even though they were moderate to strongly correlated with the standard incubation method as indicated by the correlation-regression analysis. Further research should focus on the development of reliable methods for predicting LR to attain desired pH values and consequently maximize crop production on Brazilian soils.