Critical limits of soil penetration resistance in a rhodic Eutrudox

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moraes,Moacir Tuzzin de
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Debiasi,Henrique, Carlesso,Reimar, Franchini,Julio Cezar, Silva,Vanderlei Rodrigues da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832014000100029
Resumo: Soil penetration resistance is an important indicator of soil physical quality and the critical limit of 2 MPa has been widely used to characterize the soil physical quality, in both no-tillage and conventional systems. The aim of this study was to quantify the influence of different tillage and cropping systems on the soil penetration resistance in a Rhodic Eutrudox. The experiment was carried out in a 5 × 2 factorial, completely randomized block design (tillage systems vs cropping systems), with four replications. The tillage systems consisted of: conventional tillage disk harrow; minimum tillage with annual chiseling; minimum tillage with chiseling every three years; no-tillage for 11 consecutive years; and no-tillage for 24 consecutive years. The factor cropping systems was represented by: crop rotation and crop succession. The soil penetration resistance (SPR) was determined in 20 soil samples per treatment and layer (0.0-0.10; 0.10-0.20 and 0.20-0.30 m) for each soil matric potential: -6, -10, -33, -100, -500 kPa. The SPR was determined at a volumetric soil water content equivalent to the fraction of plant-available water of 0.7. There were no differences of soil penetration resistance between the two cropping systems. Differences in soil penetration resistance among tillage systems were related to the matric potential at which the samples were equilibrated. The critical SPR limit of 2 MPa normally used for conventional tillage should be maintained. However, this value of 2 MPa is inappropriate for the physical quality characterization of Rhodic Eutrudox under no-tillage and/or minimum tillage with chiseling. Regardless of the cropping systems, the critical SPR limit should be raised to 3 MPa for minimum tillage with chiseling and to 3.5 MPa for no-tillage.
id SBCS-1_b855857d12f6e90e6f9399521d34c97c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-06832014000100029
network_acronym_str SBCS-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Critical limits of soil penetration resistance in a rhodic Eutrudoxno-tillagesoil chiselinglevel compactionSoil penetration resistance is an important indicator of soil physical quality and the critical limit of 2 MPa has been widely used to characterize the soil physical quality, in both no-tillage and conventional systems. The aim of this study was to quantify the influence of different tillage and cropping systems on the soil penetration resistance in a Rhodic Eutrudox. The experiment was carried out in a 5 × 2 factorial, completely randomized block design (tillage systems vs cropping systems), with four replications. The tillage systems consisted of: conventional tillage disk harrow; minimum tillage with annual chiseling; minimum tillage with chiseling every three years; no-tillage for 11 consecutive years; and no-tillage for 24 consecutive years. The factor cropping systems was represented by: crop rotation and crop succession. The soil penetration resistance (SPR) was determined in 20 soil samples per treatment and layer (0.0-0.10; 0.10-0.20 and 0.20-0.30 m) for each soil matric potential: -6, -10, -33, -100, -500 kPa. The SPR was determined at a volumetric soil water content equivalent to the fraction of plant-available water of 0.7. There were no differences of soil penetration resistance between the two cropping systems. Differences in soil penetration resistance among tillage systems were related to the matric potential at which the samples were equilibrated. The critical SPR limit of 2 MPa normally used for conventional tillage should be maintained. However, this value of 2 MPa is inappropriate for the physical quality characterization of Rhodic Eutrudox under no-tillage and/or minimum tillage with chiseling. Regardless of the cropping systems, the critical SPR limit should be raised to 3 MPa for minimum tillage with chiseling and to 3.5 MPa for no-tillage.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo2014-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832014000100029Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo v.38 n.1 2014reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)instacron:SBCS10.1590/S0100-06832014000100029info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoraes,Moacir Tuzzin deDebiasi,HenriqueCarlesso,ReimarFranchini,Julio CezarSilva,Vanderlei Rodrigues daeng2014-04-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-06832014000100029Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0100-0683&lng=es&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcs@ufv.br1806-96570100-0683opendoar:2014-04-01T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Critical limits of soil penetration resistance in a rhodic Eutrudox
title Critical limits of soil penetration resistance in a rhodic Eutrudox
spellingShingle Critical limits of soil penetration resistance in a rhodic Eutrudox
Moraes,Moacir Tuzzin de
no-tillage
soil chiseling
level compaction
title_short Critical limits of soil penetration resistance in a rhodic Eutrudox
title_full Critical limits of soil penetration resistance in a rhodic Eutrudox
title_fullStr Critical limits of soil penetration resistance in a rhodic Eutrudox
title_full_unstemmed Critical limits of soil penetration resistance in a rhodic Eutrudox
title_sort Critical limits of soil penetration resistance in a rhodic Eutrudox
author Moraes,Moacir Tuzzin de
author_facet Moraes,Moacir Tuzzin de
Debiasi,Henrique
Carlesso,Reimar
Franchini,Julio Cezar
Silva,Vanderlei Rodrigues da
author_role author
author2 Debiasi,Henrique
Carlesso,Reimar
Franchini,Julio Cezar
Silva,Vanderlei Rodrigues da
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moraes,Moacir Tuzzin de
Debiasi,Henrique
Carlesso,Reimar
Franchini,Julio Cezar
Silva,Vanderlei Rodrigues da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv no-tillage
soil chiseling
level compaction
topic no-tillage
soil chiseling
level compaction
description Soil penetration resistance is an important indicator of soil physical quality and the critical limit of 2 MPa has been widely used to characterize the soil physical quality, in both no-tillage and conventional systems. The aim of this study was to quantify the influence of different tillage and cropping systems on the soil penetration resistance in a Rhodic Eutrudox. The experiment was carried out in a 5 × 2 factorial, completely randomized block design (tillage systems vs cropping systems), with four replications. The tillage systems consisted of: conventional tillage disk harrow; minimum tillage with annual chiseling; minimum tillage with chiseling every three years; no-tillage for 11 consecutive years; and no-tillage for 24 consecutive years. The factor cropping systems was represented by: crop rotation and crop succession. The soil penetration resistance (SPR) was determined in 20 soil samples per treatment and layer (0.0-0.10; 0.10-0.20 and 0.20-0.30 m) for each soil matric potential: -6, -10, -33, -100, -500 kPa. The SPR was determined at a volumetric soil water content equivalent to the fraction of plant-available water of 0.7. There were no differences of soil penetration resistance between the two cropping systems. Differences in soil penetration resistance among tillage systems were related to the matric potential at which the samples were equilibrated. The critical SPR limit of 2 MPa normally used for conventional tillage should be maintained. However, this value of 2 MPa is inappropriate for the physical quality characterization of Rhodic Eutrudox under no-tillage and/or minimum tillage with chiseling. Regardless of the cropping systems, the critical SPR limit should be raised to 3 MPa for minimum tillage with chiseling and to 3.5 MPa for no-tillage.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832014000100029
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-06832014000100029
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-06832014000100029
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo v.38 n.1 2014
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
instacron:SBCS
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
instacron_str SBCS
institution SBCS
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo (SBCS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbcs@ufv.br
_version_ 1752126519383162880