Prototype for soil mechanical resistance measurement with chisel plow automated control
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Engenharia Agrícola |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162016000400646 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT In Brazil, there are several available models and systems to measure soil compaction; however, the data generated by such equipment have to be processed and interpreted, making the process expensive. Our study aimed to evaluate a prototype of instrumented rods to identify soil compacted layers and control chiseling depth, and compared it to a conventional system at a fixed depth of 0.35 m. In order to compare them, we assessed the following parameters: hourly fuel consumption, operational fuel consumption, drawbar power, average power, average speed, slipping, tractor effective field capacity and response time. Our results showed that mechanical chiseling at variable depths reduced in 26% the operational fuel consumption and increased in 14% the effective field capacity. Furthermore, the prototype of chisel plow automated control generated maps displaying spatial variability of soil mechanical resistance with resolution, sampling density and high operating capacity. |
id |
SBEA-1_3b4f5e308647488334cfabdab6f37f7c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-69162016000400646 |
network_acronym_str |
SBEA-1 |
network_name_str |
Engenharia Agrícola |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Prototype for soil mechanical resistance measurement with chisel plow automated controlprecision agriculturesoil compactionchiselingABSTRACT In Brazil, there are several available models and systems to measure soil compaction; however, the data generated by such equipment have to be processed and interpreted, making the process expensive. Our study aimed to evaluate a prototype of instrumented rods to identify soil compacted layers and control chiseling depth, and compared it to a conventional system at a fixed depth of 0.35 m. In order to compare them, we assessed the following parameters: hourly fuel consumption, operational fuel consumption, drawbar power, average power, average speed, slipping, tractor effective field capacity and response time. Our results showed that mechanical chiseling at variable depths reduced in 26% the operational fuel consumption and increased in 14% the effective field capacity. Furthermore, the prototype of chisel plow automated control generated maps displaying spatial variability of soil mechanical resistance with resolution, sampling density and high operating capacity.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162016000400646Engenharia Agrícola v.36 n.4 2016reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n4p646-655/2016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMACHADO,THIAGO M.LANÇAS,KLÉBER P.eng2016-09-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162016000400646Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2016-09-21T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prototype for soil mechanical resistance measurement with chisel plow automated control |
title |
Prototype for soil mechanical resistance measurement with chisel plow automated control |
spellingShingle |
Prototype for soil mechanical resistance measurement with chisel plow automated control MACHADO,THIAGO M. precision agriculture soil compaction chiseling |
title_short |
Prototype for soil mechanical resistance measurement with chisel plow automated control |
title_full |
Prototype for soil mechanical resistance measurement with chisel plow automated control |
title_fullStr |
Prototype for soil mechanical resistance measurement with chisel plow automated control |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prototype for soil mechanical resistance measurement with chisel plow automated control |
title_sort |
Prototype for soil mechanical resistance measurement with chisel plow automated control |
author |
MACHADO,THIAGO M. |
author_facet |
MACHADO,THIAGO M. LANÇAS,KLÉBER P. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
LANÇAS,KLÉBER P. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
MACHADO,THIAGO M. LANÇAS,KLÉBER P. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
precision agriculture soil compaction chiseling |
topic |
precision agriculture soil compaction chiseling |
description |
ABSTRACT In Brazil, there are several available models and systems to measure soil compaction; however, the data generated by such equipment have to be processed and interpreted, making the process expensive. Our study aimed to evaluate a prototype of instrumented rods to identify soil compacted layers and control chiseling depth, and compared it to a conventional system at a fixed depth of 0.35 m. In order to compare them, we assessed the following parameters: hourly fuel consumption, operational fuel consumption, drawbar power, average power, average speed, slipping, tractor effective field capacity and response time. Our results showed that mechanical chiseling at variable depths reduced in 26% the operational fuel consumption and increased in 14% the effective field capacity. Furthermore, the prototype of chisel plow automated control generated maps displaying spatial variability of soil mechanical resistance with resolution, sampling density and high operating capacity. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162016000400646 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162016000400646 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v36n4p646-655/2016 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agrícola v.36 n.4 2016 reponame:Engenharia Agrícola instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) instacron:SBEA |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) |
instacron_str |
SBEA |
institution |
SBEA |
reponame_str |
Engenharia Agrícola |
collection |
Engenharia Agrícola |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126272805273600 |