Influence of different sanitizers on food contaminant bacteria: effect of exposure temperature, contact time, and product concentration
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612012000200003 |
Resumo: | The efficiency of four Sanitizers - peracetic acid, chlorhexidine, quaternary ammonium, and organic acids - was tested in this work using different bacteria recognized as a problem to meat industry, Salmonella sp., S. aureus, E. coli and L. monocytogenes. The effects of sanitizer concentration (0.2, 0.5, 0.6, 1.0, 1.1 and 1.4%), at different temperatures (10 and 45 °C) and contact time (2, 10, 15, 18 and 25 minutes) were evaluated. Tests in an industrial plant were also carried out considering previously obtained results. In a general way, peracetic acid presented higher efficiencies using low concentration (0.2%) and contact time (2 minutes) at 10 °C. The tests performed in industrial scale showed that peracetic acid presented a good performance in concentration and contact time lower than that suggested by the suppliers. The use of chlorhexidine and quaternary ammonium led to reasonable results at the indicated conditions, and organic acids were ineffective under concentration and contact time higher than those indicated by the suppliers in relation to Staphylococcus aureus. The results, in general, show that the choice for the most adequate sanitizer depends on the microorganism contaminant, the time available for sanitizer application, and also on the process cost. |
id |
SBCTA-1_1d2db55b2a780b57525c9dfe672e31bf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0101-20612012000200003 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCTA-1 |
network_name_str |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of different sanitizers on food contaminant bacteria: effect of exposure temperature, contact time, and product concentrationsanitizersbacteriafood industriesThe efficiency of four Sanitizers - peracetic acid, chlorhexidine, quaternary ammonium, and organic acids - was tested in this work using different bacteria recognized as a problem to meat industry, Salmonella sp., S. aureus, E. coli and L. monocytogenes. The effects of sanitizer concentration (0.2, 0.5, 0.6, 1.0, 1.1 and 1.4%), at different temperatures (10 and 45 °C) and contact time (2, 10, 15, 18 and 25 minutes) were evaluated. Tests in an industrial plant were also carried out considering previously obtained results. In a general way, peracetic acid presented higher efficiencies using low concentration (0.2%) and contact time (2 minutes) at 10 °C. The tests performed in industrial scale showed that peracetic acid presented a good performance in concentration and contact time lower than that suggested by the suppliers. The use of chlorhexidine and quaternary ammonium led to reasonable results at the indicated conditions, and organic acids were ineffective under concentration and contact time higher than those indicated by the suppliers in relation to Staphylococcus aureus. The results, in general, show that the choice for the most adequate sanitizer depends on the microorganism contaminant, the time available for sanitizer application, and also on the process cost.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos2012-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612012000200003Food Science and Technology v.32 n.2 2012reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)instacron:SBCTA10.1590/S0101-20612012005000046info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBeltrame,Cezar AugustoKubiak,Gabriela BusnelloLerin,Lindomar AlbertoRottava,IedaMossi,Altemir JoséOliveira,Débora deCansian,Rogério LuisTreichel,HelenToniazzo,Gecianeeng2012-06-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-20612012000200003Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ctaONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@sbcta.org.br1678-457X0101-2061opendoar:2012-06-22T00:00Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of different sanitizers on food contaminant bacteria: effect of exposure temperature, contact time, and product concentration |
title |
Influence of different sanitizers on food contaminant bacteria: effect of exposure temperature, contact time, and product concentration |
spellingShingle |
Influence of different sanitizers on food contaminant bacteria: effect of exposure temperature, contact time, and product concentration Beltrame,Cezar Augusto sanitizers bacteria food industries |
title_short |
Influence of different sanitizers on food contaminant bacteria: effect of exposure temperature, contact time, and product concentration |
title_full |
Influence of different sanitizers on food contaminant bacteria: effect of exposure temperature, contact time, and product concentration |
title_fullStr |
Influence of different sanitizers on food contaminant bacteria: effect of exposure temperature, contact time, and product concentration |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of different sanitizers on food contaminant bacteria: effect of exposure temperature, contact time, and product concentration |
title_sort |
Influence of different sanitizers on food contaminant bacteria: effect of exposure temperature, contact time, and product concentration |
author |
Beltrame,Cezar Augusto |
author_facet |
Beltrame,Cezar Augusto Kubiak,Gabriela Busnello Lerin,Lindomar Alberto Rottava,Ieda Mossi,Altemir José Oliveira,Débora de Cansian,Rogério Luis Treichel,Helen Toniazzo,Geciane |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kubiak,Gabriela Busnello Lerin,Lindomar Alberto Rottava,Ieda Mossi,Altemir José Oliveira,Débora de Cansian,Rogério Luis Treichel,Helen Toniazzo,Geciane |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Beltrame,Cezar Augusto Kubiak,Gabriela Busnello Lerin,Lindomar Alberto Rottava,Ieda Mossi,Altemir José Oliveira,Débora de Cansian,Rogério Luis Treichel,Helen Toniazzo,Geciane |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
sanitizers bacteria food industries |
topic |
sanitizers bacteria food industries |
description |
The efficiency of four Sanitizers - peracetic acid, chlorhexidine, quaternary ammonium, and organic acids - was tested in this work using different bacteria recognized as a problem to meat industry, Salmonella sp., S. aureus, E. coli and L. monocytogenes. The effects of sanitizer concentration (0.2, 0.5, 0.6, 1.0, 1.1 and 1.4%), at different temperatures (10 and 45 °C) and contact time (2, 10, 15, 18 and 25 minutes) were evaluated. Tests in an industrial plant were also carried out considering previously obtained results. In a general way, peracetic acid presented higher efficiencies using low concentration (0.2%) and contact time (2 minutes) at 10 °C. The tests performed in industrial scale showed that peracetic acid presented a good performance in concentration and contact time lower than that suggested by the suppliers. The use of chlorhexidine and quaternary ammonium led to reasonable results at the indicated conditions, and organic acids were ineffective under concentration and contact time higher than those indicated by the suppliers in relation to Staphylococcus aureus. The results, in general, show that the choice for the most adequate sanitizer depends on the microorganism contaminant, the time available for sanitizer application, and also on the process cost. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612012000200003 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612012000200003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0101-20612012005000046 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology v.32 n.2 2012 reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) instacron:SBCTA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
instacron_str |
SBCTA |
institution |
SBCTA |
reponame_str |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
collection |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista@sbcta.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126317373947904 |