Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MAMEDE,Maria Eugênia de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: BENASSI,Marta de Toledo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612016000200195
Resumo: Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the efficiency of Flash Profiling (FP) and Ranking Descriptive Analysis (RDA) methods regarding sensory characterization using star fruit-flavored drink as matrix. Sample A was used as a standard. Other three samples were prepared based on sample A, by adding sugar, citric acid, carboxymethylcellulose or dye. The same panel (twelve assessors) was used to carry out FP and, subsequently, RDA analysis. The qualitative training stage used in RDA method showed no difference regarding the assessors’ performance and panel consensus compared to FP. Both methods were efficient and discriminated samples in a similar way and in agreement with the physicochemical characterization. However, astringent and bitter aftertaste attributes were additionally used in sample description by RDA. The latter attribute was also relevant for samples discrimination in RDA. FP application was simpler and faster, mainly regarding time spent by the assessors; however, RDA provided more comprehensive description of samples.
id SBCTA-1_3ef19e08f50a000661b909c7746514fd
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-20612016000200195
network_acronym_str SBCTA-1
network_name_str Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
repository_id_str
spelling Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drinksensory characterizationtropical fruitdiscriminationranking proceduredescriptive analysisAbstract The objective of this study was to assess the efficiency of Flash Profiling (FP) and Ranking Descriptive Analysis (RDA) methods regarding sensory characterization using star fruit-flavored drink as matrix. Sample A was used as a standard. Other three samples were prepared based on sample A, by adding sugar, citric acid, carboxymethylcellulose or dye. The same panel (twelve assessors) was used to carry out FP and, subsequently, RDA analysis. The qualitative training stage used in RDA method showed no difference regarding the assessors’ performance and panel consensus compared to FP. Both methods were efficient and discriminated samples in a similar way and in agreement with the physicochemical characterization. However, astringent and bitter aftertaste attributes were additionally used in sample description by RDA. The latter attribute was also relevant for samples discrimination in RDA. FP application was simpler and faster, mainly regarding time spent by the assessors; however, RDA provided more comprehensive description of samples.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612016000200195Food Science and Technology v.36 n.2 2016reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)instacron:SBCTA10.1590/1678-457X.0003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMAMEDE,Maria Eugênia de OliveiraBENASSI,Marta de Toledoeng2016-07-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-20612016000200195Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ctaONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@sbcta.org.br1678-457X0101-2061opendoar:2016-07-08T00:00Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink
title Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink
spellingShingle Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink
MAMEDE,Maria Eugênia de Oliveira
sensory characterization
tropical fruit
discrimination
ranking procedure
descriptive analysis
title_short Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink
title_full Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink
title_fullStr Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink
title_sort Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink
author MAMEDE,Maria Eugênia de Oliveira
author_facet MAMEDE,Maria Eugênia de Oliveira
BENASSI,Marta de Toledo
author_role author
author2 BENASSI,Marta de Toledo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MAMEDE,Maria Eugênia de Oliveira
BENASSI,Marta de Toledo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv sensory characterization
tropical fruit
discrimination
ranking procedure
descriptive analysis
topic sensory characterization
tropical fruit
discrimination
ranking procedure
descriptive analysis
description Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the efficiency of Flash Profiling (FP) and Ranking Descriptive Analysis (RDA) methods regarding sensory characterization using star fruit-flavored drink as matrix. Sample A was used as a standard. Other three samples were prepared based on sample A, by adding sugar, citric acid, carboxymethylcellulose or dye. The same panel (twelve assessors) was used to carry out FP and, subsequently, RDA analysis. The qualitative training stage used in RDA method showed no difference regarding the assessors’ performance and panel consensus compared to FP. Both methods were efficient and discriminated samples in a similar way and in agreement with the physicochemical characterization. However, astringent and bitter aftertaste attributes were additionally used in sample description by RDA. The latter attribute was also relevant for samples discrimination in RDA. FP application was simpler and faster, mainly regarding time spent by the assessors; however, RDA provided more comprehensive description of samples.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612016000200195
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612016000200195
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-457X.0003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Food Science and Technology v.36 n.2 2016
reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
instacron:SBCTA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
instacron_str SBCTA
institution SBCTA
reponame_str Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
collection Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@sbcta.org.br
_version_ 1752126320754556928