Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612016000200195 |
Resumo: | Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the efficiency of Flash Profiling (FP) and Ranking Descriptive Analysis (RDA) methods regarding sensory characterization using star fruit-flavored drink as matrix. Sample A was used as a standard. Other three samples were prepared based on sample A, by adding sugar, citric acid, carboxymethylcellulose or dye. The same panel (twelve assessors) was used to carry out FP and, subsequently, RDA analysis. The qualitative training stage used in RDA method showed no difference regarding the assessors’ performance and panel consensus compared to FP. Both methods were efficient and discriminated samples in a similar way and in agreement with the physicochemical characterization. However, astringent and bitter aftertaste attributes were additionally used in sample description by RDA. The latter attribute was also relevant for samples discrimination in RDA. FP application was simpler and faster, mainly regarding time spent by the assessors; however, RDA provided more comprehensive description of samples. |
id |
SBCTA-1_3ef19e08f50a000661b909c7746514fd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0101-20612016000200195 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCTA-1 |
network_name_str |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drinksensory characterizationtropical fruitdiscriminationranking proceduredescriptive analysisAbstract The objective of this study was to assess the efficiency of Flash Profiling (FP) and Ranking Descriptive Analysis (RDA) methods regarding sensory characterization using star fruit-flavored drink as matrix. Sample A was used as a standard. Other three samples were prepared based on sample A, by adding sugar, citric acid, carboxymethylcellulose or dye. The same panel (twelve assessors) was used to carry out FP and, subsequently, RDA analysis. The qualitative training stage used in RDA method showed no difference regarding the assessors’ performance and panel consensus compared to FP. Both methods were efficient and discriminated samples in a similar way and in agreement with the physicochemical characterization. However, astringent and bitter aftertaste attributes were additionally used in sample description by RDA. The latter attribute was also relevant for samples discrimination in RDA. FP application was simpler and faster, mainly regarding time spent by the assessors; however, RDA provided more comprehensive description of samples.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612016000200195Food Science and Technology v.36 n.2 2016reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)instacron:SBCTA10.1590/1678-457X.0003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMAMEDE,Maria Eugênia de OliveiraBENASSI,Marta de Toledoeng2016-07-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-20612016000200195Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ctaONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@sbcta.org.br1678-457X0101-2061opendoar:2016-07-08T00:00Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink |
title |
Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink |
spellingShingle |
Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink MAMEDE,Maria Eugênia de Oliveira sensory characterization tropical fruit discrimination ranking procedure descriptive analysis |
title_short |
Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink |
title_full |
Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink |
title_fullStr |
Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink |
title_sort |
Efficiency assessment of Flash Profiling and Ranking Descriptive Analysis: a comparative study with star fruit-powdered flavored drink |
author |
MAMEDE,Maria Eugênia de Oliveira |
author_facet |
MAMEDE,Maria Eugênia de Oliveira BENASSI,Marta de Toledo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
BENASSI,Marta de Toledo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
MAMEDE,Maria Eugênia de Oliveira BENASSI,Marta de Toledo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
sensory characterization tropical fruit discrimination ranking procedure descriptive analysis |
topic |
sensory characterization tropical fruit discrimination ranking procedure descriptive analysis |
description |
Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the efficiency of Flash Profiling (FP) and Ranking Descriptive Analysis (RDA) methods regarding sensory characterization using star fruit-flavored drink as matrix. Sample A was used as a standard. Other three samples were prepared based on sample A, by adding sugar, citric acid, carboxymethylcellulose or dye. The same panel (twelve assessors) was used to carry out FP and, subsequently, RDA analysis. The qualitative training stage used in RDA method showed no difference regarding the assessors’ performance and panel consensus compared to FP. Both methods were efficient and discriminated samples in a similar way and in agreement with the physicochemical characterization. However, astringent and bitter aftertaste attributes were additionally used in sample description by RDA. The latter attribute was also relevant for samples discrimination in RDA. FP application was simpler and faster, mainly regarding time spent by the assessors; however, RDA provided more comprehensive description of samples. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612016000200195 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612016000200195 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-457X.0003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology v.36 n.2 2016 reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) instacron:SBCTA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
instacron_str |
SBCTA |
institution |
SBCTA |
reponame_str |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
collection |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista@sbcta.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126320754556928 |