Comparison between freeze and spray drying to obtain powder Rubrivivax gelatinosus biomass

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santo,Edson Francisco do Espírito
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Lima,Leandro Kanamaru Franco de, Torres,Ane Pamela Capucci, Oliveira,Gabriela de, Ponsano,Elisa Helena Giglio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000100008
Resumo: The use of colorants in products of animal origin is justified by the improvement in the color of foods since this attribute is considered a quality criterion. These additives can be produced using industrial effluents as substrates and appropriate organisms, such as Rubrivivax gelatinosus. Oxycarotenoids represent a class of carotenes responsible for the pigmentation of animals and vegetables. R. gelatinosus grows in fish industry effluent with the resulting production of a bacterial biomass containing oxycarotenoids. The purpose of this study was to compare the use of two drying processes - spray and freeze drying - to obtain powder biomass in terms of the process parameters (yield, productivity, and product recovery) and the product characteristics (color, proximate composition, and oxycarotenoids). No difference was detected in the yield between these techniques, while productivity was higher using spray drying. Higher product recovery and moisture were achieved with freeze drying, while ash was higher with spray drying. The freeze dried biomass was redder, darker and less saturated than the spray dried biomass. No difference in oxycarotenoids was detected between the biomasses. Although it results in lower recovery rate, spray drying was faster and more productive, and it provided the same yield as freeze drying, which makes it the method of choice for obtaining R. gelatinosus biomass.
id SBCTA-1_4e6852a120d8a838ca9afeec0591b9e8
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-20612013000100008
network_acronym_str SBCTA-1
network_name_str Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison between freeze and spray drying to obtain powder Rubrivivax gelatinosus biomassbiomassbiological pigmentsRubrivivax gelatinosusThe use of colorants in products of animal origin is justified by the improvement in the color of foods since this attribute is considered a quality criterion. These additives can be produced using industrial effluents as substrates and appropriate organisms, such as Rubrivivax gelatinosus. Oxycarotenoids represent a class of carotenes responsible for the pigmentation of animals and vegetables. R. gelatinosus grows in fish industry effluent with the resulting production of a bacterial biomass containing oxycarotenoids. The purpose of this study was to compare the use of two drying processes - spray and freeze drying - to obtain powder biomass in terms of the process parameters (yield, productivity, and product recovery) and the product characteristics (color, proximate composition, and oxycarotenoids). No difference was detected in the yield between these techniques, while productivity was higher using spray drying. Higher product recovery and moisture were achieved with freeze drying, while ash was higher with spray drying. The freeze dried biomass was redder, darker and less saturated than the spray dried biomass. No difference in oxycarotenoids was detected between the biomasses. Although it results in lower recovery rate, spray drying was faster and more productive, and it provided the same yield as freeze drying, which makes it the method of choice for obtaining R. gelatinosus biomass.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos2013-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000100008Food Science and Technology v.33 n.1 2013reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)instacron:SBCTA10.1590/S0101-20612013005000008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSanto,Edson Francisco do EspíritoLima,Leandro Kanamaru Franco deTorres,Ane Pamela CapucciOliveira,Gabriela dePonsano,Elisa Helena Giglioeng2013-04-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-20612013000100008Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ctaONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@sbcta.org.br1678-457X0101-2061opendoar:2013-04-17T00:00Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison between freeze and spray drying to obtain powder Rubrivivax gelatinosus biomass
title Comparison between freeze and spray drying to obtain powder Rubrivivax gelatinosus biomass
spellingShingle Comparison between freeze and spray drying to obtain powder Rubrivivax gelatinosus biomass
Santo,Edson Francisco do Espírito
biomass
biological pigments
Rubrivivax gelatinosus
title_short Comparison between freeze and spray drying to obtain powder Rubrivivax gelatinosus biomass
title_full Comparison between freeze and spray drying to obtain powder Rubrivivax gelatinosus biomass
title_fullStr Comparison between freeze and spray drying to obtain powder Rubrivivax gelatinosus biomass
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between freeze and spray drying to obtain powder Rubrivivax gelatinosus biomass
title_sort Comparison between freeze and spray drying to obtain powder Rubrivivax gelatinosus biomass
author Santo,Edson Francisco do Espírito
author_facet Santo,Edson Francisco do Espírito
Lima,Leandro Kanamaru Franco de
Torres,Ane Pamela Capucci
Oliveira,Gabriela de
Ponsano,Elisa Helena Giglio
author_role author
author2 Lima,Leandro Kanamaru Franco de
Torres,Ane Pamela Capucci
Oliveira,Gabriela de
Ponsano,Elisa Helena Giglio
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santo,Edson Francisco do Espírito
Lima,Leandro Kanamaru Franco de
Torres,Ane Pamela Capucci
Oliveira,Gabriela de
Ponsano,Elisa Helena Giglio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv biomass
biological pigments
Rubrivivax gelatinosus
topic biomass
biological pigments
Rubrivivax gelatinosus
description The use of colorants in products of animal origin is justified by the improvement in the color of foods since this attribute is considered a quality criterion. These additives can be produced using industrial effluents as substrates and appropriate organisms, such as Rubrivivax gelatinosus. Oxycarotenoids represent a class of carotenes responsible for the pigmentation of animals and vegetables. R. gelatinosus grows in fish industry effluent with the resulting production of a bacterial biomass containing oxycarotenoids. The purpose of this study was to compare the use of two drying processes - spray and freeze drying - to obtain powder biomass in terms of the process parameters (yield, productivity, and product recovery) and the product characteristics (color, proximate composition, and oxycarotenoids). No difference was detected in the yield between these techniques, while productivity was higher using spray drying. Higher product recovery and moisture were achieved with freeze drying, while ash was higher with spray drying. The freeze dried biomass was redder, darker and less saturated than the spray dried biomass. No difference in oxycarotenoids was detected between the biomasses. Although it results in lower recovery rate, spray drying was faster and more productive, and it provided the same yield as freeze drying, which makes it the method of choice for obtaining R. gelatinosus biomass.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000100008
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000100008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0101-20612013005000008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Food Science and Technology v.33 n.1 2013
reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
instacron:SBCTA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
instacron_str SBCTA
institution SBCTA
reponame_str Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
collection Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@sbcta.org.br
_version_ 1752126318259994624