Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000400003 |
Resumo: | This paper aims to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics, sensory acceptance, and purchase intent of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and other sweeteners (neotame, sucralose and stevia extracts with 40%, 60%, 80%, and 95% rebaudioside A). The analyses were carried out for pH, soluble solids, total titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, and colorimetry (L*a*b). The acceptance test was performed by 120 consumers who evaluated the appearance, aroma, flavor, texture, and overall impression of the samples using a 9-cm unstructured hedonic scale. Furthermore, the consumers were asked to rate overall purchase intent along the scale anchored with (1) "would definitely not purchase" to (5) "would definitely purchase." The results were evaluated using analysis of variance/Tukey test and the internal preference mapping technique. The acerola nectar samples did not differ significantly (p>0.05) between themselves in terms of vitamin C content and total titratable acidity. As for appearance and aroma, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the samples, and as for flavor and overall impression, the most accepted samples were those with sucrose and sucralose. The internal preference mapping indicated that the most accepted samples were those with sucrose, sucralose, and neotame were. The highest frequency of positive purchase intent scores was observed for sucrose and sucralose. |
id |
SBCTA-1_518f3d27ce5da0fee03036992ecaebd2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0101-20612013000400003 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCTA-1 |
network_name_str |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweetenersStevia rebaudianasucraloseneotameMalpighia emarginata DCThis paper aims to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics, sensory acceptance, and purchase intent of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and other sweeteners (neotame, sucralose and stevia extracts with 40%, 60%, 80%, and 95% rebaudioside A). The analyses were carried out for pH, soluble solids, total titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, and colorimetry (L*a*b). The acceptance test was performed by 120 consumers who evaluated the appearance, aroma, flavor, texture, and overall impression of the samples using a 9-cm unstructured hedonic scale. Furthermore, the consumers were asked to rate overall purchase intent along the scale anchored with (1) "would definitely not purchase" to (5) "would definitely purchase." The results were evaluated using analysis of variance/Tukey test and the internal preference mapping technique. The acerola nectar samples did not differ significantly (p>0.05) between themselves in terms of vitamin C content and total titratable acidity. As for appearance and aroma, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the samples, and as for flavor and overall impression, the most accepted samples were those with sucrose and sucralose. The internal preference mapping indicated that the most accepted samples were those with sucrose, sucralose, and neotame were. The highest frequency of positive purchase intent scores was observed for sucrose and sucralose.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos2013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000400003Food Science and Technology v.33 n.4 2013reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)instacron:SBCTA10.1590/S0101-20612013000400003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDutra,Mariana Borges de LimaBolini,Helena Maria Andréeng2014-02-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-20612013000400003Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ctaONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@sbcta.org.br1678-457X0101-2061opendoar:2014-02-12T00:00Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners |
title |
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners |
spellingShingle |
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners Dutra,Mariana Borges de Lima Stevia rebaudiana sucralose neotame Malpighia emarginata DC |
title_short |
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners |
title_full |
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners |
title_fullStr |
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners |
title_sort |
Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners |
author |
Dutra,Mariana Borges de Lima |
author_facet |
Dutra,Mariana Borges de Lima Bolini,Helena Maria André |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bolini,Helena Maria André |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dutra,Mariana Borges de Lima Bolini,Helena Maria André |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Stevia rebaudiana sucralose neotame Malpighia emarginata DC |
topic |
Stevia rebaudiana sucralose neotame Malpighia emarginata DC |
description |
This paper aims to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics, sensory acceptance, and purchase intent of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and other sweeteners (neotame, sucralose and stevia extracts with 40%, 60%, 80%, and 95% rebaudioside A). The analyses were carried out for pH, soluble solids, total titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, and colorimetry (L*a*b). The acceptance test was performed by 120 consumers who evaluated the appearance, aroma, flavor, texture, and overall impression of the samples using a 9-cm unstructured hedonic scale. Furthermore, the consumers were asked to rate overall purchase intent along the scale anchored with (1) "would definitely not purchase" to (5) "would definitely purchase." The results were evaluated using analysis of variance/Tukey test and the internal preference mapping technique. The acerola nectar samples did not differ significantly (p>0.05) between themselves in terms of vitamin C content and total titratable acidity. As for appearance and aroma, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the samples, and as for flavor and overall impression, the most accepted samples were those with sucrose and sucralose. The internal preference mapping indicated that the most accepted samples were those with sucrose, sucralose, and neotame were. The highest frequency of positive purchase intent scores was observed for sucrose and sucralose. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000400003 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000400003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0101-20612013000400003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology v.33 n.4 2013 reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) instacron:SBCTA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
instacron_str |
SBCTA |
institution |
SBCTA |
reponame_str |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
collection |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista@sbcta.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126318154088448 |