Evaluation of the BAX® system for the detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally contaminated chicken meat

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Frausto,Harissa Silvério El Ghoz
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Alves,Juliane, Oliveira,Tereza Cristina Rocha Moreira De
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000300014
Resumo: The aim of this study was to verify the efficiency of the BAX® system for the detection of Salmonella spp. in raw chicken meat. The conventional culture method (IN 62, MAP) was used as a reference method. A total of 8,813 chicken carcass samples were analyzed. In the first part of the study, 1,200 samples were analyzed using the BAX® System and the conventional culture method. In the second part, 7,613 samples were analyzed by the BAX® system, and the conventional method was used only for samples that tested positive for Salmonella spp. by the BAX® system. The sensitivity, specificity, relative accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value obtained in the first part of this study were 100%, 92.3%, 96.4%, 53.3% and 100%, respectively. The BAX® system showed no false-negative results and reduced the time to obtain presumptive positive results. It is a suitable method for use in laboratories that perform a large number of food samples analyses daily. However, the conventional method is still required to confirm the presence of Salmonella spp. in samples that test positive using the BAX® system.
id SBCTA-1_a1deca00e1cfac8b5ad4ec3d857103a7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-20612013000300014
network_acronym_str SBCTA-1
network_name_str Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of the BAX® system for the detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally contaminated chicken meatmolecular methodsPCRrapid methodsThe aim of this study was to verify the efficiency of the BAX® system for the detection of Salmonella spp. in raw chicken meat. The conventional culture method (IN 62, MAP) was used as a reference method. A total of 8,813 chicken carcass samples were analyzed. In the first part of the study, 1,200 samples were analyzed using the BAX® System and the conventional culture method. In the second part, 7,613 samples were analyzed by the BAX® system, and the conventional method was used only for samples that tested positive for Salmonella spp. by the BAX® system. The sensitivity, specificity, relative accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value obtained in the first part of this study were 100%, 92.3%, 96.4%, 53.3% and 100%, respectively. The BAX® system showed no false-negative results and reduced the time to obtain presumptive positive results. It is a suitable method for use in laboratories that perform a large number of food samples analyses daily. However, the conventional method is still required to confirm the presence of Salmonella spp. in samples that test positive using the BAX® system.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos2013-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000300014Food Science and Technology v.33 n.3 2013reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)instacron:SBCTA10.1590/S0101-20612013005000056info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFrausto,Harissa Silvério El GhozAlves,JulianeOliveira,Tereza Cristina Rocha Moreira Deeng2013-10-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-20612013000300014Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ctaONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@sbcta.org.br1678-457X0101-2061opendoar:2013-10-08T00:00Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the BAX® system for the detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally contaminated chicken meat
title Evaluation of the BAX® system for the detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally contaminated chicken meat
spellingShingle Evaluation of the BAX® system for the detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally contaminated chicken meat
Frausto,Harissa Silvério El Ghoz
molecular methods
PCR
rapid methods
title_short Evaluation of the BAX® system for the detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally contaminated chicken meat
title_full Evaluation of the BAX® system for the detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally contaminated chicken meat
title_fullStr Evaluation of the BAX® system for the detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally contaminated chicken meat
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the BAX® system for the detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally contaminated chicken meat
title_sort Evaluation of the BAX® system for the detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally contaminated chicken meat
author Frausto,Harissa Silvério El Ghoz
author_facet Frausto,Harissa Silvério El Ghoz
Alves,Juliane
Oliveira,Tereza Cristina Rocha Moreira De
author_role author
author2 Alves,Juliane
Oliveira,Tereza Cristina Rocha Moreira De
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Frausto,Harissa Silvério El Ghoz
Alves,Juliane
Oliveira,Tereza Cristina Rocha Moreira De
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv molecular methods
PCR
rapid methods
topic molecular methods
PCR
rapid methods
description The aim of this study was to verify the efficiency of the BAX® system for the detection of Salmonella spp. in raw chicken meat. The conventional culture method (IN 62, MAP) was used as a reference method. A total of 8,813 chicken carcass samples were analyzed. In the first part of the study, 1,200 samples were analyzed using the BAX® System and the conventional culture method. In the second part, 7,613 samples were analyzed by the BAX® system, and the conventional method was used only for samples that tested positive for Salmonella spp. by the BAX® system. The sensitivity, specificity, relative accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value obtained in the first part of this study were 100%, 92.3%, 96.4%, 53.3% and 100%, respectively. The BAX® system showed no false-negative results and reduced the time to obtain presumptive positive results. It is a suitable method for use in laboratories that perform a large number of food samples analyses daily. However, the conventional method is still required to confirm the presence of Salmonella spp. in samples that test positive using the BAX® system.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000300014
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000300014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0101-20612013005000056
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Food Science and Technology v.33 n.3 2013
reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
instacron:SBCTA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
instacron_str SBCTA
institution SBCTA
reponame_str Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
collection Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@sbcta.org.br
_version_ 1752126318598684672