Risk perception related to food
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612020000400779 |
Resumo: | Abstract There is no human activity that is risk free, including those most trivial and essential for survival, such as eating. Various factors impact the risk perception of a population, such as whether the risk is voluntary, known, brings some benefits or whether the information about the risk is provided by sources seen as trusted. Furthermore, regional and cultural aspects, gender and age can also have an impact on risk perception, and the level of scientific knowledge of the individual about the risks has in many cases little impact on the risk perception. In most countries, the perception of consumers to certain risks present in food, including genetically modified organisms (GMO), pesticides and food additives is high, probably due to the lack of confidence on the industry and governmental authorities that are responsible to control the risks. Food that are considered more natural, such as organic food and “GMO free”, are normally perceived as less risky/more healthy. Knowing the perception of the population regarding the risks present in food is essential to design clear and transparent risk communication strategies, which should consider, in addition to scientific information, the subjective aspects that affects the risk perception. |
id |
SBCTA-1_b22a1f1aa2325f01aa0870553e3889c3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0101-20612020000400779 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCTA-1 |
network_name_str |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Risk perception related to foodrisk perceptionfoodcontaminantspesticide residuestechnologyAbstract There is no human activity that is risk free, including those most trivial and essential for survival, such as eating. Various factors impact the risk perception of a population, such as whether the risk is voluntary, known, brings some benefits or whether the information about the risk is provided by sources seen as trusted. Furthermore, regional and cultural aspects, gender and age can also have an impact on risk perception, and the level of scientific knowledge of the individual about the risks has in many cases little impact on the risk perception. In most countries, the perception of consumers to certain risks present in food, including genetically modified organisms (GMO), pesticides and food additives is high, probably due to the lack of confidence on the industry and governmental authorities that are responsible to control the risks. Food that are considered more natural, such as organic food and “GMO free”, are normally perceived as less risky/more healthy. Knowing the perception of the population regarding the risks present in food is essential to design clear and transparent risk communication strategies, which should consider, in addition to scientific information, the subjective aspects that affects the risk perception.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos2020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612020000400779Food Science and Technology v.40 n.4 2020reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)instacron:SBCTA10.1590/fst.28219info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessREMBISCHEVSKI,PeterCALDAS,Eloisa Dutraeng2020-10-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-20612020000400779Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ctaONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@sbcta.org.br1678-457X0101-2061opendoar:2020-10-23T00:00Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Risk perception related to food |
title |
Risk perception related to food |
spellingShingle |
Risk perception related to food REMBISCHEVSKI,Peter risk perception food contaminants pesticide residues technology |
title_short |
Risk perception related to food |
title_full |
Risk perception related to food |
title_fullStr |
Risk perception related to food |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk perception related to food |
title_sort |
Risk perception related to food |
author |
REMBISCHEVSKI,Peter |
author_facet |
REMBISCHEVSKI,Peter CALDAS,Eloisa Dutra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
CALDAS,Eloisa Dutra |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
REMBISCHEVSKI,Peter CALDAS,Eloisa Dutra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
risk perception food contaminants pesticide residues technology |
topic |
risk perception food contaminants pesticide residues technology |
description |
Abstract There is no human activity that is risk free, including those most trivial and essential for survival, such as eating. Various factors impact the risk perception of a population, such as whether the risk is voluntary, known, brings some benefits or whether the information about the risk is provided by sources seen as trusted. Furthermore, regional and cultural aspects, gender and age can also have an impact on risk perception, and the level of scientific knowledge of the individual about the risks has in many cases little impact on the risk perception. In most countries, the perception of consumers to certain risks present in food, including genetically modified organisms (GMO), pesticides and food additives is high, probably due to the lack of confidence on the industry and governmental authorities that are responsible to control the risks. Food that are considered more natural, such as organic food and “GMO free”, are normally perceived as less risky/more healthy. Knowing the perception of the population regarding the risks present in food is essential to design clear and transparent risk communication strategies, which should consider, in addition to scientific information, the subjective aspects that affects the risk perception. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612020000400779 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612020000400779 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/fst.28219 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology v.40 n.4 2020 reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) instacron:SBCTA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
instacron_str |
SBCTA |
institution |
SBCTA |
reponame_str |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
collection |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista@sbcta.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126326742974464 |