Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Andrade, Marcel Levy
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Sturion, Gilma Lucazechi, Mendoza, Natalie Verónika Rondinel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
Texto Completo: https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/581
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of risk by food handlers in the food services of the tourism sector. One structured methodological instrument was used to analyze the risk perception of 108 food handlers from 19 establishments in a tourist region in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. The highest score was related to the subject “Integrated pest control” and the lowest level was related to “Eating soft-cooked eggs”. Differences (p < 0.05) were observed among the levels of risk perception, making it possible to form three sub-groups concerning the questions. The central topic of the first sub-group was safety aspects in food production (I), the second related to sanitation operations (II) and the third to integrated pest control (III). Sub-groups II and III presented the greatest level of perceived risk. Differences (p < 0.05) between the level of risk perception and the socio-demographic variables were identified. Women showed greater risk perception compared to men. The results can provide important information for public and private programs, improving development of institutional strategies directed at food safety.
id FIOCRUZ-9_4d68a65e0f577e5e7ac6257f07928bb1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/581
network_acronym_str FIOCRUZ-9
network_name_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository_id_str
spelling Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sectorRisk perception by food handlers in the tourism sectorPercepçãoRiscoServiços de SaúdeTurismoManipuladores de AlimentosVigilância SanitáriaPerceptionRiskFood ServicesTourismFood HandlersSanitary SurveillanceThe objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of risk by food handlers in the food services of the tourism sector. One structured methodological instrument was used to analyze the risk perception of 108 food handlers from 19 establishments in a tourist region in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. The highest score was related to the subject “Integrated pest control” and the lowest level was related to “Eating soft-cooked eggs”. Differences (p < 0.05) were observed among the levels of risk perception, making it possible to form three sub-groups concerning the questions. The central topic of the first sub-group was safety aspects in food production (I), the second related to sanitation operations (II) and the third to integrated pest control (III). Sub-groups II and III presented the greatest level of perceived risk. Differences (p < 0.05) between the level of risk perception and the socio-demographic variables were identified. Women showed greater risk perception compared to men. The results can provide important information for public and private programs, improving development of institutional strategies directed at food safety.TÍTULO PT: Percepção de risco por manipuladores de alimentos do setor de turismoO objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a percepção de risco de manipuladores de alimentos em serviços de alimentação do setor de turismo. Um instrumento metodológico estruturado foi aplicado para avaliar a percepção de risco de 108 manipuladores em 19 estabelecimentos de uma região turística no Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. O maior escore médio entre os níveis de risco percebido foi relacionado ao tema “Controle Integrado de Pragas” e o menor nível a “Comer ovos de gema mole”. Diferenças (p < 0,05) foram observadas entre os níveis de percepção de risco, possibilitando a formação de três subgrupos em relação ao conjunto de questões. O tema central do primeiro subgrupo está relacionado aos aspectos de segurança na produção de alimentos (I), o segundo, as operações de higiene (II) e o terceiro ao controle integrado de pragas (III). Os subgrupos II e III apresentaram maior nível de risco percebido. Foram identificadas diferenças (p < 0,05) entre o nível de risco percebido e as variáveis sociodemográficas. As mulheres apresentaram maior nível de risco percebido do que os homens. Os resultados podem fornecer informações importantes para programas públicos e privados, visando o desenvolvimento de estratégias institucionais direcionadas à segurança dos alimentos.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2016-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/58110.22239/2317-269X.00581Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 4 (2016): November - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 23-33Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2016): Noviembre - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 23-33Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 4 (2016): Novembro - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 23-332317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/581/335Copyright (c) 2016 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Andrade, Marcel LevySturion, Gilma LucazechiMendoza, Natalie Verónika Rondinel2023-06-27T15:18:27Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/581Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:18:27Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector
Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector
title Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector
spellingShingle Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector
de Andrade, Marcel Levy
Percepção
Risco
Serviços de Saúde
Turismo
Manipuladores de Alimentos
Vigilância Sanitária
Perception
Risk
Food Services
Tourism
Food Handlers
Sanitary Surveillance
title_short Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector
title_full Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector
title_fullStr Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector
title_full_unstemmed Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector
title_sort Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector
author de Andrade, Marcel Levy
author_facet de Andrade, Marcel Levy
Sturion, Gilma Lucazechi
Mendoza, Natalie Verónika Rondinel
author_role author
author2 Sturion, Gilma Lucazechi
Mendoza, Natalie Verónika Rondinel
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Andrade, Marcel Levy
Sturion, Gilma Lucazechi
Mendoza, Natalie Verónika Rondinel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Percepção
Risco
Serviços de Saúde
Turismo
Manipuladores de Alimentos
Vigilância Sanitária
Perception
Risk
Food Services
Tourism
Food Handlers
Sanitary Surveillance
topic Percepção
Risco
Serviços de Saúde
Turismo
Manipuladores de Alimentos
Vigilância Sanitária
Perception
Risk
Food Services
Tourism
Food Handlers
Sanitary Surveillance
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of risk by food handlers in the food services of the tourism sector. One structured methodological instrument was used to analyze the risk perception of 108 food handlers from 19 establishments in a tourist region in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. The highest score was related to the subject “Integrated pest control” and the lowest level was related to “Eating soft-cooked eggs”. Differences (p < 0.05) were observed among the levels of risk perception, making it possible to form three sub-groups concerning the questions. The central topic of the first sub-group was safety aspects in food production (I), the second related to sanitation operations (II) and the third to integrated pest control (III). Sub-groups II and III presented the greatest level of perceived risk. Differences (p < 0.05) between the level of risk perception and the socio-demographic variables were identified. Women showed greater risk perception compared to men. The results can provide important information for public and private programs, improving development of institutional strategies directed at food safety.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed article"
"Artículo revisado por pares"
"Artigo avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/581
10.22239/2317-269X.00581
url https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/581
identifier_str_mv 10.22239/2317-269X.00581
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/581/335
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 4 (2016): November - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 23-33
Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2016): Noviembre - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 23-33
Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 4 (2016): Novembro - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 23-33
2317-269X
reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron:FIOCRUZ
instname_str Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
instacron_str FIOCRUZ
institution FIOCRUZ
reponame_str Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
collection Vigilância Sanitária em Debate
repository.name.fl_str_mv Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1797042044217065472