Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
DOI: | 10.22239/2317-269X.00581 |
Texto Completo: | https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/581 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of risk by food handlers in the food services of the tourism sector. One structured methodological instrument was used to analyze the risk perception of 108 food handlers from 19 establishments in a tourist region in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. The highest score was related to the subject “Integrated pest control” and the lowest level was related to “Eating soft-cooked eggs”. Differences (p < 0.05) were observed among the levels of risk perception, making it possible to form three sub-groups concerning the questions. The central topic of the first sub-group was safety aspects in food production (I), the second related to sanitation operations (II) and the third to integrated pest control (III). Sub-groups II and III presented the greatest level of perceived risk. Differences (p < 0.05) between the level of risk perception and the socio-demographic variables were identified. Women showed greater risk perception compared to men. The results can provide important information for public and private programs, improving development of institutional strategies directed at food safety. |
id |
FIOCRUZ-9_4d68a65e0f577e5e7ac6257f07928bb1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/581 |
network_acronym_str |
FIOCRUZ-9 |
network_name_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
spelling |
Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sectorRisk perception by food handlers in the tourism sectorPercepçãoRiscoServiços de SaúdeTurismoManipuladores de AlimentosVigilância SanitáriaPerceptionRiskFood ServicesTourismFood HandlersSanitary SurveillanceThe objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of risk by food handlers in the food services of the tourism sector. One structured methodological instrument was used to analyze the risk perception of 108 food handlers from 19 establishments in a tourist region in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. The highest score was related to the subject “Integrated pest control” and the lowest level was related to “Eating soft-cooked eggs”. Differences (p < 0.05) were observed among the levels of risk perception, making it possible to form three sub-groups concerning the questions. The central topic of the first sub-group was safety aspects in food production (I), the second related to sanitation operations (II) and the third to integrated pest control (III). Sub-groups II and III presented the greatest level of perceived risk. Differences (p < 0.05) between the level of risk perception and the socio-demographic variables were identified. Women showed greater risk perception compared to men. The results can provide important information for public and private programs, improving development of institutional strategies directed at food safety.TÍTULO PT: Percepção de risco por manipuladores de alimentos do setor de turismoO objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a percepção de risco de manipuladores de alimentos em serviços de alimentação do setor de turismo. Um instrumento metodológico estruturado foi aplicado para avaliar a percepção de risco de 108 manipuladores em 19 estabelecimentos de uma região turística no Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. O maior escore médio entre os níveis de risco percebido foi relacionado ao tema “Controle Integrado de Pragas” e o menor nível a “Comer ovos de gema mole”. Diferenças (p < 0,05) foram observadas entre os níveis de percepção de risco, possibilitando a formação de três subgrupos em relação ao conjunto de questões. O tema central do primeiro subgrupo está relacionado aos aspectos de segurança na produção de alimentos (I), o segundo, as operações de higiene (II) e o terceiro ao controle integrado de pragas (III). Os subgrupos II e III apresentaram maior nível de risco percebido. Foram identificadas diferenças (p < 0,05) entre o nível de risco percebido e as variáveis sociodemográficas. As mulheres apresentaram maior nível de risco percebido do que os homens. Os resultados podem fornecer informações importantes para programas públicos e privados, visando o desenvolvimento de estratégias institucionais direcionadas à segurança dos alimentos.Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde2016-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed article""Artículo revisado por pares""Artigo avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/58110.22239/2317-269X.00581Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 4 (2016): November - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 23-33Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2016): Noviembre - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 23-33Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 4 (2016): Novembro - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 23-332317-269Xreponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debateinstname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)instacron:FIOCRUZenghttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/581/335Copyright (c) 2016 Vigilância Sanitária em Debate: Sociedade, Ciência & Tecnologia (Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology) – Visa em Debatehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Andrade, Marcel LevySturion, Gilma LucazechiMendoza, Natalie Verónika Rondinel2023-06-27T15:18:27Zoai:ojs.visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br:article/581Revistahttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebatePUBhttps://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/oaiincqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br2317-269X2317-269Xopendoar:2023-06-27T15:18:27Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector |
title |
Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector |
spellingShingle |
Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector de Andrade, Marcel Levy Percepção Risco Serviços de Saúde Turismo Manipuladores de Alimentos Vigilância Sanitária Perception Risk Food Services Tourism Food Handlers Sanitary Surveillance de Andrade, Marcel Levy Percepção Risco Serviços de Saúde Turismo Manipuladores de Alimentos Vigilância Sanitária Perception Risk Food Services Tourism Food Handlers Sanitary Surveillance |
title_short |
Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector |
title_full |
Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector |
title_fullStr |
Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector |
title_sort |
Risk perception by food handlers in the tourism sector |
author |
de Andrade, Marcel Levy |
author_facet |
de Andrade, Marcel Levy de Andrade, Marcel Levy Sturion, Gilma Lucazechi Mendoza, Natalie Verónika Rondinel Sturion, Gilma Lucazechi Mendoza, Natalie Verónika Rondinel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sturion, Gilma Lucazechi Mendoza, Natalie Verónika Rondinel |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Andrade, Marcel Levy Sturion, Gilma Lucazechi Mendoza, Natalie Verónika Rondinel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Percepção Risco Serviços de Saúde Turismo Manipuladores de Alimentos Vigilância Sanitária Perception Risk Food Services Tourism Food Handlers Sanitary Surveillance |
topic |
Percepção Risco Serviços de Saúde Turismo Manipuladores de Alimentos Vigilância Sanitária Perception Risk Food Services Tourism Food Handlers Sanitary Surveillance |
description |
The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception of risk by food handlers in the food services of the tourism sector. One structured methodological instrument was used to analyze the risk perception of 108 food handlers from 19 establishments in a tourist region in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. The highest score was related to the subject “Integrated pest control” and the lowest level was related to “Eating soft-cooked eggs”. Differences (p < 0.05) were observed among the levels of risk perception, making it possible to form three sub-groups concerning the questions. The central topic of the first sub-group was safety aspects in food production (I), the second related to sanitation operations (II) and the third to integrated pest control (III). Sub-groups II and III presented the greatest level of perceived risk. Differences (p < 0.05) between the level of risk perception and the socio-demographic variables were identified. Women showed greater risk perception compared to men. The results can provide important information for public and private programs, improving development of institutional strategies directed at food safety. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed article" "Artículo revisado por pares" "Artigo avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/581 10.22239/2317-269X.00581 |
url |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/581 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.00581 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://visaemdebate.incqs.fiocruz.br/index.php/visaemdebate/article/view/581/335 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Controle de Qualidade em Saúde |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Health Surveillance under Debate: Society, Science & Technology ; Vol. 4 No. 4 (2016): November - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 23-33 Vigilancia en Salud en Debate: Sociedad, Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 4 Núm. 4 (2016): Noviembre - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 23-33 Vigil Sanit Debate, Rio de Janeiro; v. 4 n. 4 (2016): Novembro - Diversidades Culturais e Riscos Sanitários; 23-33 2317-269X reponame:Vigilância Sanitária em Debate instname:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) instacron:FIOCRUZ |
instname_str |
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
instacron_str |
FIOCRUZ |
institution |
FIOCRUZ |
reponame_str |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
collection |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Vigilância Sanitária em Debate - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
incqs.visaemdebate@fiocruz.br || gisele.neves@fiocruz.br |
_version_ |
1822182070341861376 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.22239/2317-269X.00581 |