Should all patients with psoriasis receive statins? Analysis according to different strategies,
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962019000600691 |
Resumo: | Abstract Background: Different strategies have been proposed for the cardiovascular risk management of patients with psoriasis. Objective: To estimate the cardiovascular risk and evaluate two cardiovascular prevention strategies in patients with psoriasis, analyzing which proportion of patients would be candidates to receive statin therapy. Methods: A retrospective cohort was selected from a secondary database. All patients >18 years with psoriasis without cardiovascular disease or lipid-lowering treatment were included. The atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease calculator (2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines) and the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation risk calculator (2016 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Atherosclerosis guidelines) were calculated. The SCORE risk value was adjusted by a multiplication factor of 1.5. The recommendations for the indication of statins suggested by both guidelines were analyzed. Results: A total of 892 patients (mean age 59.9 ± 16.5 years, 54.5% women) were included. The median atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease calculator and Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation values were 13.4% (IQR 6.1-27.0%) and 1.9% (IQR 0.4-5.2), respectively. According to the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease calculator, 20.1%, 11.0%, 32.9%, and 36.4% of the population was classified at low, borderline, moderate, or high risk. Applying the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation, 26.5%, 42.9%, 20.8%, and 9.8% of patients were stratified as having low, moderate, high, or very high risk, respectively. The proportion of subjects with statin indication was similar using both strategies: 60.1% and 60.9% for the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and 2016 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Atherosclerosis guidelines, respectively. Study limitations: This was a secondary database study. Data on the severity of psoriasis and pharmacological treatments were not included in the analysis. Conclusion: This population with psoriasis was mostly classified at moderate-high risk and the statin therapy indication was similar when applying the two strategies evaluated. |
id |
SBD-1_303ecdeb248f9dbe6ebdaace811780c7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0365-05962019000600691 |
network_acronym_str |
SBD-1 |
network_name_str |
Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Should all patients with psoriasis receive statins? Analysis according to different strategies,Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitorsLipidsPsoriasisAbstract Background: Different strategies have been proposed for the cardiovascular risk management of patients with psoriasis. Objective: To estimate the cardiovascular risk and evaluate two cardiovascular prevention strategies in patients with psoriasis, analyzing which proportion of patients would be candidates to receive statin therapy. Methods: A retrospective cohort was selected from a secondary database. All patients >18 years with psoriasis without cardiovascular disease or lipid-lowering treatment were included. The atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease calculator (2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines) and the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation risk calculator (2016 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Atherosclerosis guidelines) were calculated. The SCORE risk value was adjusted by a multiplication factor of 1.5. The recommendations for the indication of statins suggested by both guidelines were analyzed. Results: A total of 892 patients (mean age 59.9 ± 16.5 years, 54.5% women) were included. The median atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease calculator and Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation values were 13.4% (IQR 6.1-27.0%) and 1.9% (IQR 0.4-5.2), respectively. According to the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease calculator, 20.1%, 11.0%, 32.9%, and 36.4% of the population was classified at low, borderline, moderate, or high risk. Applying the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation, 26.5%, 42.9%, 20.8%, and 9.8% of patients were stratified as having low, moderate, high, or very high risk, respectively. The proportion of subjects with statin indication was similar using both strategies: 60.1% and 60.9% for the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and 2016 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Atherosclerosis guidelines, respectively. Study limitations: This was a secondary database study. Data on the severity of psoriasis and pharmacological treatments were not included in the analysis. Conclusion: This population with psoriasis was mostly classified at moderate-high risk and the statin therapy indication was similar when applying the two strategies evaluated.Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia2019-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962019000600691Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia v.94 n.6 2019reponame:Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD)instacron:SBD10.1016/j.abd.2019.03.001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMasson,WalterLobo,MartínMolinero,GracielaRossi,Emilianoeng2020-01-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0365-05962019000600691Revistahttp://www.anaisdedermatologia.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpabd@sbd.org.br||revista@sbd.org.br1806-48410365-0596opendoar:2020-01-29T00:00Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Should all patients with psoriasis receive statins? Analysis according to different strategies, |
title |
Should all patients with psoriasis receive statins? Analysis according to different strategies, |
spellingShingle |
Should all patients with psoriasis receive statins? Analysis according to different strategies, Masson,Walter Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors Lipids Psoriasis |
title_short |
Should all patients with psoriasis receive statins? Analysis according to different strategies, |
title_full |
Should all patients with psoriasis receive statins? Analysis according to different strategies, |
title_fullStr |
Should all patients with psoriasis receive statins? Analysis according to different strategies, |
title_full_unstemmed |
Should all patients with psoriasis receive statins? Analysis according to different strategies, |
title_sort |
Should all patients with psoriasis receive statins? Analysis according to different strategies, |
author |
Masson,Walter |
author_facet |
Masson,Walter Lobo,Martín Molinero,Graciela Rossi,Emiliano |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lobo,Martín Molinero,Graciela Rossi,Emiliano |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Masson,Walter Lobo,Martín Molinero,Graciela Rossi,Emiliano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors Lipids Psoriasis |
topic |
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors Lipids Psoriasis |
description |
Abstract Background: Different strategies have been proposed for the cardiovascular risk management of patients with psoriasis. Objective: To estimate the cardiovascular risk and evaluate two cardiovascular prevention strategies in patients with psoriasis, analyzing which proportion of patients would be candidates to receive statin therapy. Methods: A retrospective cohort was selected from a secondary database. All patients >18 years with psoriasis without cardiovascular disease or lipid-lowering treatment were included. The atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease calculator (2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines) and the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation risk calculator (2016 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Atherosclerosis guidelines) were calculated. The SCORE risk value was adjusted by a multiplication factor of 1.5. The recommendations for the indication of statins suggested by both guidelines were analyzed. Results: A total of 892 patients (mean age 59.9 ± 16.5 years, 54.5% women) were included. The median atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease calculator and Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation values were 13.4% (IQR 6.1-27.0%) and 1.9% (IQR 0.4-5.2), respectively. According to the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease calculator, 20.1%, 11.0%, 32.9%, and 36.4% of the population was classified at low, borderline, moderate, or high risk. Applying the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation, 26.5%, 42.9%, 20.8%, and 9.8% of patients were stratified as having low, moderate, high, or very high risk, respectively. The proportion of subjects with statin indication was similar using both strategies: 60.1% and 60.9% for the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and 2016 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Atherosclerosis guidelines, respectively. Study limitations: This was a secondary database study. Data on the severity of psoriasis and pharmacological treatments were not included in the analysis. Conclusion: This population with psoriasis was mostly classified at moderate-high risk and the statin therapy indication was similar when applying the two strategies evaluated. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962019000600691 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0365-05962019000600691 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.abd.2019.03.001 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia v.94 n.6 2019 reponame:Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD) instacron:SBD |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD) |
instacron_str |
SBD |
institution |
SBD |
reponame_str |
Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) |
collection |
Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Anais brasileiros de dermatologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (SBD) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
abd@sbd.org.br||revista@sbd.org.br |
_version_ |
1752126423500324864 |