Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tiraboshi,Ricardo Brianezi
Data de Publicação: 2003
Outros Autores: Domingos,André Luis Alonso, Dias Neto,José Anastácio, Paschoal,Ricardo Mesquita, Travassos,José, Martins,Antonio Carlos Pereira, Suaid,Haylton José, Cologna,Adauto José, Tucci Jr,Silvio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502003001200004
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy and safety of compressed air to produce pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery in pigs for a training program of residence. METHODS: Dalland pigs weighing 15-17kg underwent general anethesia and mechanical ventilation. They were divided in 3 groups: A - (38) the pneumoperitnoneum was established with an automatic CO2 insufflator, B - (7) as in A except the CO2 gas was changed by compressed air, and C - (11) abdomen insufflation was obtained with compressed air directly from hospital pipe network system. Intra-abdominal pressure in all groups was kept between 12 and 15 mmHg. The laparoscopic procedures performed were distributed proportionally among groups: 20 bilateral nephrectomy, 20 dismembered pyeloplasty and 16 partial nephrectomy. Arterial blood sampling for gasometry was obtained before and 2h after establishment of pneumoperitoneum in 5 pigs of group C. RESULTS: The cost of 25 4,5kg CO2 container used in group A was R$ 3,150.00 (U$ 1,050.00). The mean length time of surgeries in groups A, B and C were respectively: 181±30min, 196±39min e 210±47min (p>0.05). Respiratory alkalosis occurred in 3 out of 5 pigs of group C. No animal exhibited signs of gas embolism or died during surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of compressed air for laparoscopy in pigs was safe, reduced costs and did not require the use of an automatic gas insufflator.
id SBDPC-1_3490d4e3f313f7dee85e3c3c3c68ecb4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-86502003001200004
network_acronym_str SBDPC-1
network_name_str Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?LaparoscopyNephrectomyPyeloplastyPartial nephrectomyPneumoperitoneumCO2 gasCompressed airOBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy and safety of compressed air to produce pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery in pigs for a training program of residence. METHODS: Dalland pigs weighing 15-17kg underwent general anethesia and mechanical ventilation. They were divided in 3 groups: A - (38) the pneumoperitnoneum was established with an automatic CO2 insufflator, B - (7) as in A except the CO2 gas was changed by compressed air, and C - (11) abdomen insufflation was obtained with compressed air directly from hospital pipe network system. Intra-abdominal pressure in all groups was kept between 12 and 15 mmHg. The laparoscopic procedures performed were distributed proportionally among groups: 20 bilateral nephrectomy, 20 dismembered pyeloplasty and 16 partial nephrectomy. Arterial blood sampling for gasometry was obtained before and 2h after establishment of pneumoperitoneum in 5 pigs of group C. RESULTS: The cost of 25 4,5kg CO2 container used in group A was R$ 3,150.00 (U$ 1,050.00). The mean length time of surgeries in groups A, B and C were respectively: 181±30min, 196±39min e 210±47min (p>0.05). Respiratory alkalosis occurred in 3 out of 5 pigs of group C. No animal exhibited signs of gas embolism or died during surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of compressed air for laparoscopy in pigs was safe, reduced costs and did not require the use of an automatic gas insufflator.Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia2003-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502003001200004Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.18 suppl.5 2003reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)instacron:SBDPC10.1590/S0102-86502003001200004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTiraboshi,Ricardo BrianeziDomingos,André Luis AlonsoDias Neto,José AnastácioPaschoal,Ricardo MesquitaTravassos,JoséMartins,Antonio Carlos PereiraSuaid,Haylton JoséCologna,Adauto JoséTucci Jr,Silvioeng2004-04-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-86502003001200004Revistahttps://www.bvs-vet.org.br/vetindex/periodicos/acta-cirurgica-brasileira/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sgolden@terra.com.br0102-86501678-2674opendoar:2004-04-29T00:00Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
title Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
spellingShingle Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
Tiraboshi,Ricardo Brianezi
Laparoscopy
Nephrectomy
Pyeloplasty
Partial nephrectomy
Pneumoperitoneum
CO2 gas
Compressed air
title_short Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
title_full Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
title_fullStr Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
title_full_unstemmed Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
title_sort Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
author Tiraboshi,Ricardo Brianezi
author_facet Tiraboshi,Ricardo Brianezi
Domingos,André Luis Alonso
Dias Neto,José Anastácio
Paschoal,Ricardo Mesquita
Travassos,José
Martins,Antonio Carlos Pereira
Suaid,Haylton José
Cologna,Adauto José
Tucci Jr,Silvio
author_role author
author2 Domingos,André Luis Alonso
Dias Neto,José Anastácio
Paschoal,Ricardo Mesquita
Travassos,José
Martins,Antonio Carlos Pereira
Suaid,Haylton José
Cologna,Adauto José
Tucci Jr,Silvio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tiraboshi,Ricardo Brianezi
Domingos,André Luis Alonso
Dias Neto,José Anastácio
Paschoal,Ricardo Mesquita
Travassos,José
Martins,Antonio Carlos Pereira
Suaid,Haylton José
Cologna,Adauto José
Tucci Jr,Silvio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Laparoscopy
Nephrectomy
Pyeloplasty
Partial nephrectomy
Pneumoperitoneum
CO2 gas
Compressed air
topic Laparoscopy
Nephrectomy
Pyeloplasty
Partial nephrectomy
Pneumoperitoneum
CO2 gas
Compressed air
description OBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy and safety of compressed air to produce pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery in pigs for a training program of residence. METHODS: Dalland pigs weighing 15-17kg underwent general anethesia and mechanical ventilation. They were divided in 3 groups: A - (38) the pneumoperitnoneum was established with an automatic CO2 insufflator, B - (7) as in A except the CO2 gas was changed by compressed air, and C - (11) abdomen insufflation was obtained with compressed air directly from hospital pipe network system. Intra-abdominal pressure in all groups was kept between 12 and 15 mmHg. The laparoscopic procedures performed were distributed proportionally among groups: 20 bilateral nephrectomy, 20 dismembered pyeloplasty and 16 partial nephrectomy. Arterial blood sampling for gasometry was obtained before and 2h after establishment of pneumoperitoneum in 5 pigs of group C. RESULTS: The cost of 25 4,5kg CO2 container used in group A was R$ 3,150.00 (U$ 1,050.00). The mean length time of surgeries in groups A, B and C were respectively: 181±30min, 196±39min e 210±47min (p>0.05). Respiratory alkalosis occurred in 3 out of 5 pigs of group C. No animal exhibited signs of gas embolism or died during surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of compressed air for laparoscopy in pigs was safe, reduced costs and did not require the use of an automatic gas insufflator.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502003001200004
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502003001200004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0102-86502003001200004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.18 suppl.5 2003
reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
instacron:SBDPC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
instacron_str SBDPC
institution SBDPC
reponame_str Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
collection Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sgolden@terra.com.br
_version_ 1752126436928389120