Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2003 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502003001200004 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy and safety of compressed air to produce pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery in pigs for a training program of residence. METHODS: Dalland pigs weighing 15-17kg underwent general anethesia and mechanical ventilation. They were divided in 3 groups: A - (38) the pneumoperitnoneum was established with an automatic CO2 insufflator, B - (7) as in A except the CO2 gas was changed by compressed air, and C - (11) abdomen insufflation was obtained with compressed air directly from hospital pipe network system. Intra-abdominal pressure in all groups was kept between 12 and 15 mmHg. The laparoscopic procedures performed were distributed proportionally among groups: 20 bilateral nephrectomy, 20 dismembered pyeloplasty and 16 partial nephrectomy. Arterial blood sampling for gasometry was obtained before and 2h after establishment of pneumoperitoneum in 5 pigs of group C. RESULTS: The cost of 25 4,5kg CO2 container used in group A was R$ 3,150.00 (U$ 1,050.00). The mean length time of surgeries in groups A, B and C were respectively: 181±30min, 196±39min e 210±47min (p>0.05). Respiratory alkalosis occurred in 3 out of 5 pigs of group C. No animal exhibited signs of gas embolism or died during surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of compressed air for laparoscopy in pigs was safe, reduced costs and did not require the use of an automatic gas insufflator. |
id |
SBDPC-1_3490d4e3f313f7dee85e3c3c3c68ecb4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-86502003001200004 |
network_acronym_str |
SBDPC-1 |
network_name_str |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?LaparoscopyNephrectomyPyeloplastyPartial nephrectomyPneumoperitoneumCO2 gasCompressed airOBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy and safety of compressed air to produce pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery in pigs for a training program of residence. METHODS: Dalland pigs weighing 15-17kg underwent general anethesia and mechanical ventilation. They were divided in 3 groups: A - (38) the pneumoperitnoneum was established with an automatic CO2 insufflator, B - (7) as in A except the CO2 gas was changed by compressed air, and C - (11) abdomen insufflation was obtained with compressed air directly from hospital pipe network system. Intra-abdominal pressure in all groups was kept between 12 and 15 mmHg. The laparoscopic procedures performed were distributed proportionally among groups: 20 bilateral nephrectomy, 20 dismembered pyeloplasty and 16 partial nephrectomy. Arterial blood sampling for gasometry was obtained before and 2h after establishment of pneumoperitoneum in 5 pigs of group C. RESULTS: The cost of 25 4,5kg CO2 container used in group A was R$ 3,150.00 (U$ 1,050.00). The mean length time of surgeries in groups A, B and C were respectively: 181±30min, 196±39min e 210±47min (p>0.05). Respiratory alkalosis occurred in 3 out of 5 pigs of group C. No animal exhibited signs of gas embolism or died during surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of compressed air for laparoscopy in pigs was safe, reduced costs and did not require the use of an automatic gas insufflator.Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia2003-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502003001200004Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.18 suppl.5 2003reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)instacron:SBDPC10.1590/S0102-86502003001200004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTiraboshi,Ricardo BrianeziDomingos,André Luis AlonsoDias Neto,José AnastácioPaschoal,Ricardo MesquitaTravassos,JoséMartins,Antonio Carlos PereiraSuaid,Haylton JoséCologna,Adauto JoséTucci Jr,Silvioeng2004-04-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-86502003001200004Revistahttps://www.bvs-vet.org.br/vetindex/periodicos/acta-cirurgica-brasileira/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sgolden@terra.com.br0102-86501678-2674opendoar:2004-04-29T00:00Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? |
title |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? |
spellingShingle |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? Tiraboshi,Ricardo Brianezi Laparoscopy Nephrectomy Pyeloplasty Partial nephrectomy Pneumoperitoneum CO2 gas Compressed air |
title_short |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? |
title_full |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? |
title_fullStr |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? |
title_sort |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? |
author |
Tiraboshi,Ricardo Brianezi |
author_facet |
Tiraboshi,Ricardo Brianezi Domingos,André Luis Alonso Dias Neto,José Anastácio Paschoal,Ricardo Mesquita Travassos,José Martins,Antonio Carlos Pereira Suaid,Haylton José Cologna,Adauto José Tucci Jr,Silvio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Domingos,André Luis Alonso Dias Neto,José Anastácio Paschoal,Ricardo Mesquita Travassos,José Martins,Antonio Carlos Pereira Suaid,Haylton José Cologna,Adauto José Tucci Jr,Silvio |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tiraboshi,Ricardo Brianezi Domingos,André Luis Alonso Dias Neto,José Anastácio Paschoal,Ricardo Mesquita Travassos,José Martins,Antonio Carlos Pereira Suaid,Haylton José Cologna,Adauto José Tucci Jr,Silvio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Laparoscopy Nephrectomy Pyeloplasty Partial nephrectomy Pneumoperitoneum CO2 gas Compressed air |
topic |
Laparoscopy Nephrectomy Pyeloplasty Partial nephrectomy Pneumoperitoneum CO2 gas Compressed air |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy and safety of compressed air to produce pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery in pigs for a training program of residence. METHODS: Dalland pigs weighing 15-17kg underwent general anethesia and mechanical ventilation. They were divided in 3 groups: A - (38) the pneumoperitnoneum was established with an automatic CO2 insufflator, B - (7) as in A except the CO2 gas was changed by compressed air, and C - (11) abdomen insufflation was obtained with compressed air directly from hospital pipe network system. Intra-abdominal pressure in all groups was kept between 12 and 15 mmHg. The laparoscopic procedures performed were distributed proportionally among groups: 20 bilateral nephrectomy, 20 dismembered pyeloplasty and 16 partial nephrectomy. Arterial blood sampling for gasometry was obtained before and 2h after establishment of pneumoperitoneum in 5 pigs of group C. RESULTS: The cost of 25 4,5kg CO2 container used in group A was R$ 3,150.00 (U$ 1,050.00). The mean length time of surgeries in groups A, B and C were respectively: 181±30min, 196±39min e 210±47min (p>0.05). Respiratory alkalosis occurred in 3 out of 5 pigs of group C. No animal exhibited signs of gas embolism or died during surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of compressed air for laparoscopy in pigs was safe, reduced costs and did not require the use of an automatic gas insufflator. |
publishDate |
2003 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2003-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502003001200004 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502003001200004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0102-86502003001200004 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.18 suppl.5 2003 reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) instacron:SBDPC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) |
instacron_str |
SBDPC |
institution |
SBDPC |
reponame_str |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sgolden@terra.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126436928389120 |