Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tiraboshi, Ricardo Brianezi
Data de Publicação: 2003
Outros Autores: Domingos, André Luis Alonso, Dias Neto, José Anastácio, Paschoal, Ricardo Mesquita, Travassos, José, Martins, Antonio Carlos Pereira, Suaid, Haylton Jorge, Cologna, Adauto José, Tucci Júnior, Silvio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMS
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/197
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy and safety of compressed air to produce pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery in pigs for a training program of residence. METHODS: Dalland pigs weighing 15-17kg underwent general anethesia and mechanical ventilation. They were divided in 3 groups: A – (38) the pneumoperitnoneum was established with an automatic CO2 insufflator, B – (7) as in A except the CO2 gas was changed by compressed air, and C – (11) abdomen insufflation was obtained with compressed air directly from hospital pipe network system. Intra-abdominal pressure in all groups was kept between 12 and 15 mmHg. The laparoscopic procedures performed were distributed proportionally among groups: 20 bilateral nephrectomy, 20 dismembered pyeloplasty and 16 partial nephrectomy. Arterial blood sampling for gasometry was obtained before and 2h after establishment of pneumoperitoneum in 5 pigs of group C. RESULTS: The cost of 25 4,5kg CO2 container used in group A was R$ 3,150.00 (U$ 1,050.00). The mean length time of surgeries in groups A, B and C were respectively: 181±30min, 196±39min e 210±47min (p>0.05). Respiratory alkalosis occurred in 3 out of 5 pigs of group C. No animal exhibited signs of gas embolism or died during surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of compressed air for laparoscopy in pigs was safe, reduced costs and did not require the use of an automatic gas insufflator.
id UFMS_0bdaa38864226433bb6a0bea5a22b162
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufms.br:123456789/197
network_acronym_str UFMS
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMS
repository_id_str 2124
spelling 2011-07-28T20:12:48Z2021-09-30T19:56:48Z2003TIRABOSHI, Ricardo Brianezi et al . Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?. Acta Cir. Bras., São Paulo, 2011 . Available from <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502003001200004&lng=en&nrm=iso>. access on 28 July 2011. doi: 10.1590/S0102-86502003001200004.https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/19710.1590/S0102-86502003001200004OBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy and safety of compressed air to produce pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery in pigs for a training program of residence. METHODS: Dalland pigs weighing 15-17kg underwent general anethesia and mechanical ventilation. They were divided in 3 groups: A – (38) the pneumoperitnoneum was established with an automatic CO2 insufflator, B – (7) as in A except the CO2 gas was changed by compressed air, and C – (11) abdomen insufflation was obtained with compressed air directly from hospital pipe network system. Intra-abdominal pressure in all groups was kept between 12 and 15 mmHg. The laparoscopic procedures performed were distributed proportionally among groups: 20 bilateral nephrectomy, 20 dismembered pyeloplasty and 16 partial nephrectomy. Arterial blood sampling for gasometry was obtained before and 2h after establishment of pneumoperitoneum in 5 pigs of group C. RESULTS: The cost of 25 4,5kg CO2 container used in group A was R$ 3,150.00 (U$ 1,050.00). The mean length time of surgeries in groups A, B and C were respectively: 181±30min, 196±39min e 210±47min (p>0.05). Respiratory alkalosis occurred in 3 out of 5 pigs of group C. No animal exhibited signs of gas embolism or died during surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of compressed air for laparoscopy in pigs was safe, reduced costs and did not require the use of an automatic gas insufflator.OBJETIVO: Testar a eficácia e segurança do pneumoperitônio com ar comprimido para cirurgias videolaparoscópicas em porcos em treinamento de residência médica. MÉTODOS: Porcos da raça Dalland de peso variável de 15 a 17kg foram submetidos a anestesia geral e respiração controlada. Eles foram divididos em 3 grupos: A – 38 animais com pneumoperitônio feito com insuflador automático de CO2 usando este gás; B – 7 animais sujeitos ao mesmo procedimento exceto que o CO2 foi substituído por ar comprimido; e, C – 11 animais em que o pneumoperitônio foi feito com ar comprimido diretamente da rede hospitalar. Nos 3 grupos a pressão intra-abdominal foi mantida entre 12 e 14mmHg. Os procedimentos realizados foram distribuídos proporcionalmente nos 3 grupos: nefrectomia bilateral – 20, pieloplastia desmembrada – 20 e nefrectomia parcial – 16. Antes e 2h após o pneumoperitônio foi colhido sangue arterial para gasometria em 5 porcos do grupo C. RESULTADOS: Foram consumidos 25 torpedos de 4,5kg de CO2 a um custo total de R$ 3.150,00 no grupo A. A duração média da cirurgia nos grupos A, B e C foram respectivamente: 181±30min, 196±39min e 210±47min (p>0.05). Alcalose respiratória foi observada em 3/5 porcos testados do grupo C. Nenhum animal apresentou sinais de embolia gasosa ou faleceu durante o procedimento. CONCLUSÃO: O uso de ar comprimido para laparoscopias em porcos mostrou-se método seguro com redução de custos e tornou desnecessário o uso de insuflador automático.engActa Cirurgica BrasileiraLaparoscopiaNefrectomiaPneumoperitônioAr ComprimidoDióxido de CarbonoLaparoscopyNephrectomyPneumoperitoneumCompressed AirCarbon DioxideIs CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?O insuflador de gás CO2 é necessário para treino de laparoscopia em animais?info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleTiraboshi, Ricardo BrianeziDomingos, André Luis AlonsoDias Neto, José AnastácioPaschoal, Ricardo MesquitaTravassos, JoséMartins, Antonio Carlos PereiraSuaid, Haylton JorgeCologna, Adauto JoséTucci Júnior, Silvioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMSinstname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)instacron:UFMSTHUMBNAILIs CO2 gas unsufflator necessary.pdf.jpgIs CO2 gas unsufflator necessary.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1726https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/4/Is%20CO2%20gas%20unsufflator%20necessary.pdf.jpg28a65c552d3f74802cb80f0144e903acMD54ORIGINALIs CO2 gas unsufflator necessary.pdfIs CO2 gas unsufflator necessary.pdfapplication/pdf25090https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/1/Is%20CO2%20gas%20unsufflator%20necessary.pdff6187da501d2a706f17426d2f36adbf7MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52TEXTIs CO2 gas unsufflator necessary.pdf.txtIs CO2 gas unsufflator necessary.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain20890https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/3/Is%20CO2%20gas%20unsufflator%20necessary.pdf.txtb9706cf896aa3aa9c6085d0ca5093928MD53123456789/1972021-09-30 15:56:48.585oai:repositorio.ufms.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufms.br/oai/requestri.prograd@ufms.bropendoar:21242021-09-30T19:56:48Repositório Institucional da UFMS - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
dc.title.alternative.pt_BR.fl_str_mv O insuflador de gás CO2 é necessário para treino de laparoscopia em animais?
title Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
spellingShingle Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
Tiraboshi, Ricardo Brianezi
Laparoscopia
Nefrectomia
Pneumoperitônio
Ar Comprimido
Dióxido de Carbono
Laparoscopy
Nephrectomy
Pneumoperitoneum
Compressed Air
Carbon Dioxide
title_short Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
title_full Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
title_fullStr Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
title_full_unstemmed Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
title_sort Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
author Tiraboshi, Ricardo Brianezi
author_facet Tiraboshi, Ricardo Brianezi
Domingos, André Luis Alonso
Dias Neto, José Anastácio
Paschoal, Ricardo Mesquita
Travassos, José
Martins, Antonio Carlos Pereira
Suaid, Haylton Jorge
Cologna, Adauto José
Tucci Júnior, Silvio
author_role author
author2 Domingos, André Luis Alonso
Dias Neto, José Anastácio
Paschoal, Ricardo Mesquita
Travassos, José
Martins, Antonio Carlos Pereira
Suaid, Haylton Jorge
Cologna, Adauto José
Tucci Júnior, Silvio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tiraboshi, Ricardo Brianezi
Domingos, André Luis Alonso
Dias Neto, José Anastácio
Paschoal, Ricardo Mesquita
Travassos, José
Martins, Antonio Carlos Pereira
Suaid, Haylton Jorge
Cologna, Adauto José
Tucci Júnior, Silvio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Laparoscopia
Nefrectomia
Pneumoperitônio
Ar Comprimido
Dióxido de Carbono
Laparoscopy
Nephrectomy
Pneumoperitoneum
Compressed Air
Carbon Dioxide
topic Laparoscopia
Nefrectomia
Pneumoperitônio
Ar Comprimido
Dióxido de Carbono
Laparoscopy
Nephrectomy
Pneumoperitoneum
Compressed Air
Carbon Dioxide
description OBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy and safety of compressed air to produce pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery in pigs for a training program of residence. METHODS: Dalland pigs weighing 15-17kg underwent general anethesia and mechanical ventilation. They were divided in 3 groups: A – (38) the pneumoperitnoneum was established with an automatic CO2 insufflator, B – (7) as in A except the CO2 gas was changed by compressed air, and C – (11) abdomen insufflation was obtained with compressed air directly from hospital pipe network system. Intra-abdominal pressure in all groups was kept between 12 and 15 mmHg. The laparoscopic procedures performed were distributed proportionally among groups: 20 bilateral nephrectomy, 20 dismembered pyeloplasty and 16 partial nephrectomy. Arterial blood sampling for gasometry was obtained before and 2h after establishment of pneumoperitoneum in 5 pigs of group C. RESULTS: The cost of 25 4,5kg CO2 container used in group A was R$ 3,150.00 (U$ 1,050.00). The mean length time of surgeries in groups A, B and C were respectively: 181±30min, 196±39min e 210±47min (p>0.05). Respiratory alkalosis occurred in 3 out of 5 pigs of group C. No animal exhibited signs of gas embolism or died during surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of compressed air for laparoscopy in pigs was safe, reduced costs and did not require the use of an automatic gas insufflator.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2003
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2011-07-28T20:12:48Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-09-30T19:56:48Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv TIRABOSHI, Ricardo Brianezi et al . Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?. Acta Cir. Bras., São Paulo, 2011 . Available from <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502003001200004&lng=en&nrm=iso>. access on 28 July 2011. doi: 10.1590/S0102-86502003001200004.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/197
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0102-86502003001200004
identifier_str_mv TIRABOSHI, Ricardo Brianezi et al . Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?. Acta Cir. Bras., São Paulo, 2011 . Available from <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502003001200004&lng=en&nrm=iso>. access on 28 July 2011. doi: 10.1590/S0102-86502003001200004.
10.1590/S0102-86502003001200004
url https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/197
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Acta Cirurgica Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Acta Cirurgica Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMS
instname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
instacron:UFMS
instname_str Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
instacron_str UFMS
institution UFMS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/4/Is%20CO2%20gas%20unsufflator%20necessary.pdf.jpg
https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/1/Is%20CO2%20gas%20unsufflator%20necessary.pdf
https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/2/license.txt
https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/3/Is%20CO2%20gas%20unsufflator%20necessary.pdf.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 28a65c552d3f74802cb80f0144e903ac
f6187da501d2a706f17426d2f36adbf7
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
b9706cf896aa3aa9c6085d0ca5093928
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMS - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri.prograd@ufms.br
_version_ 1807552840828190720