Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2003 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFMS |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/197 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy and safety of compressed air to produce pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery in pigs for a training program of residence. METHODS: Dalland pigs weighing 15-17kg underwent general anethesia and mechanical ventilation. They were divided in 3 groups: A – (38) the pneumoperitnoneum was established with an automatic CO2 insufflator, B – (7) as in A except the CO2 gas was changed by compressed air, and C – (11) abdomen insufflation was obtained with compressed air directly from hospital pipe network system. Intra-abdominal pressure in all groups was kept between 12 and 15 mmHg. The laparoscopic procedures performed were distributed proportionally among groups: 20 bilateral nephrectomy, 20 dismembered pyeloplasty and 16 partial nephrectomy. Arterial blood sampling for gasometry was obtained before and 2h after establishment of pneumoperitoneum in 5 pigs of group C. RESULTS: The cost of 25 4,5kg CO2 container used in group A was R$ 3,150.00 (U$ 1,050.00). The mean length time of surgeries in groups A, B and C were respectively: 181±30min, 196±39min e 210±47min (p>0.05). Respiratory alkalosis occurred in 3 out of 5 pigs of group C. No animal exhibited signs of gas embolism or died during surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of compressed air for laparoscopy in pigs was safe, reduced costs and did not require the use of an automatic gas insufflator. |
id |
UFMS_0bdaa38864226433bb6a0bea5a22b162 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufms.br:123456789/197 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMS |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMS |
repository_id_str |
2124 |
spelling |
2011-07-28T20:12:48Z2021-09-30T19:56:48Z2003TIRABOSHI, Ricardo Brianezi et al . Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?. Acta Cir. Bras., São Paulo, 2011 . Available from <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502003001200004&lng=en&nrm=iso>. access on 28 July 2011. doi: 10.1590/S0102-86502003001200004.https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/19710.1590/S0102-86502003001200004OBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy and safety of compressed air to produce pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery in pigs for a training program of residence. METHODS: Dalland pigs weighing 15-17kg underwent general anethesia and mechanical ventilation. They were divided in 3 groups: A – (38) the pneumoperitnoneum was established with an automatic CO2 insufflator, B – (7) as in A except the CO2 gas was changed by compressed air, and C – (11) abdomen insufflation was obtained with compressed air directly from hospital pipe network system. Intra-abdominal pressure in all groups was kept between 12 and 15 mmHg. The laparoscopic procedures performed were distributed proportionally among groups: 20 bilateral nephrectomy, 20 dismembered pyeloplasty and 16 partial nephrectomy. Arterial blood sampling for gasometry was obtained before and 2h after establishment of pneumoperitoneum in 5 pigs of group C. RESULTS: The cost of 25 4,5kg CO2 container used in group A was R$ 3,150.00 (U$ 1,050.00). The mean length time of surgeries in groups A, B and C were respectively: 181±30min, 196±39min e 210±47min (p>0.05). Respiratory alkalosis occurred in 3 out of 5 pigs of group C. No animal exhibited signs of gas embolism or died during surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of compressed air for laparoscopy in pigs was safe, reduced costs and did not require the use of an automatic gas insufflator.OBJETIVO: Testar a eficácia e segurança do pneumoperitônio com ar comprimido para cirurgias videolaparoscópicas em porcos em treinamento de residência médica. MÉTODOS: Porcos da raça Dalland de peso variável de 15 a 17kg foram submetidos a anestesia geral e respiração controlada. Eles foram divididos em 3 grupos: A – 38 animais com pneumoperitônio feito com insuflador automático de CO2 usando este gás; B – 7 animais sujeitos ao mesmo procedimento exceto que o CO2 foi substituído por ar comprimido; e, C – 11 animais em que o pneumoperitônio foi feito com ar comprimido diretamente da rede hospitalar. Nos 3 grupos a pressão intra-abdominal foi mantida entre 12 e 14mmHg. Os procedimentos realizados foram distribuídos proporcionalmente nos 3 grupos: nefrectomia bilateral – 20, pieloplastia desmembrada – 20 e nefrectomia parcial – 16. Antes e 2h após o pneumoperitônio foi colhido sangue arterial para gasometria em 5 porcos do grupo C. RESULTADOS: Foram consumidos 25 torpedos de 4,5kg de CO2 a um custo total de R$ 3.150,00 no grupo A. A duração média da cirurgia nos grupos A, B e C foram respectivamente: 181±30min, 196±39min e 210±47min (p>0.05). Alcalose respiratória foi observada em 3/5 porcos testados do grupo C. Nenhum animal apresentou sinais de embolia gasosa ou faleceu durante o procedimento. CONCLUSÃO: O uso de ar comprimido para laparoscopias em porcos mostrou-se método seguro com redução de custos e tornou desnecessário o uso de insuflador automático.engActa Cirurgica BrasileiraLaparoscopiaNefrectomiaPneumoperitônioAr ComprimidoDióxido de CarbonoLaparoscopyNephrectomyPneumoperitoneumCompressed AirCarbon DioxideIs CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?O insuflador de gás CO2 é necessário para treino de laparoscopia em animais?info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleTiraboshi, Ricardo BrianeziDomingos, André Luis AlonsoDias Neto, José AnastácioPaschoal, Ricardo MesquitaTravassos, JoséMartins, Antonio Carlos PereiraSuaid, Haylton JorgeCologna, Adauto JoséTucci Júnior, Silvioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMSinstname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)instacron:UFMSTHUMBNAILIs CO2 gas unsufflator necessary.pdf.jpgIs CO2 gas unsufflator necessary.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1726https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/4/Is%20CO2%20gas%20unsufflator%20necessary.pdf.jpg28a65c552d3f74802cb80f0144e903acMD54ORIGINALIs CO2 gas unsufflator necessary.pdfIs CO2 gas unsufflator necessary.pdfapplication/pdf25090https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/1/Is%20CO2%20gas%20unsufflator%20necessary.pdff6187da501d2a706f17426d2f36adbf7MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52TEXTIs CO2 gas unsufflator necessary.pdf.txtIs CO2 gas unsufflator necessary.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain20890https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/3/Is%20CO2%20gas%20unsufflator%20necessary.pdf.txtb9706cf896aa3aa9c6085d0ca5093928MD53123456789/1972021-09-30 15:56:48.585oai:repositorio.ufms.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufms.br/oai/requestri.prograd@ufms.bropendoar:21242021-09-30T19:56:48Repositório Institucional da UFMS - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? |
dc.title.alternative.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
O insuflador de gás CO2 é necessário para treino de laparoscopia em animais? |
title |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? |
spellingShingle |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? Tiraboshi, Ricardo Brianezi Laparoscopia Nefrectomia Pneumoperitônio Ar Comprimido Dióxido de Carbono Laparoscopy Nephrectomy Pneumoperitoneum Compressed Air Carbon Dioxide |
title_short |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? |
title_full |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? |
title_fullStr |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? |
title_sort |
Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals? |
author |
Tiraboshi, Ricardo Brianezi |
author_facet |
Tiraboshi, Ricardo Brianezi Domingos, André Luis Alonso Dias Neto, José Anastácio Paschoal, Ricardo Mesquita Travassos, José Martins, Antonio Carlos Pereira Suaid, Haylton Jorge Cologna, Adauto José Tucci Júnior, Silvio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Domingos, André Luis Alonso Dias Neto, José Anastácio Paschoal, Ricardo Mesquita Travassos, José Martins, Antonio Carlos Pereira Suaid, Haylton Jorge Cologna, Adauto José Tucci Júnior, Silvio |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tiraboshi, Ricardo Brianezi Domingos, André Luis Alonso Dias Neto, José Anastácio Paschoal, Ricardo Mesquita Travassos, José Martins, Antonio Carlos Pereira Suaid, Haylton Jorge Cologna, Adauto José Tucci Júnior, Silvio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Laparoscopia Nefrectomia Pneumoperitônio Ar Comprimido Dióxido de Carbono Laparoscopy Nephrectomy Pneumoperitoneum Compressed Air Carbon Dioxide |
topic |
Laparoscopia Nefrectomia Pneumoperitônio Ar Comprimido Dióxido de Carbono Laparoscopy Nephrectomy Pneumoperitoneum Compressed Air Carbon Dioxide |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy and safety of compressed air to produce pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery in pigs for a training program of residence. METHODS: Dalland pigs weighing 15-17kg underwent general anethesia and mechanical ventilation. They were divided in 3 groups: A – (38) the pneumoperitnoneum was established with an automatic CO2 insufflator, B – (7) as in A except the CO2 gas was changed by compressed air, and C – (11) abdomen insufflation was obtained with compressed air directly from hospital pipe network system. Intra-abdominal pressure in all groups was kept between 12 and 15 mmHg. The laparoscopic procedures performed were distributed proportionally among groups: 20 bilateral nephrectomy, 20 dismembered pyeloplasty and 16 partial nephrectomy. Arterial blood sampling for gasometry was obtained before and 2h after establishment of pneumoperitoneum in 5 pigs of group C. RESULTS: The cost of 25 4,5kg CO2 container used in group A was R$ 3,150.00 (U$ 1,050.00). The mean length time of surgeries in groups A, B and C were respectively: 181±30min, 196±39min e 210±47min (p>0.05). Respiratory alkalosis occurred in 3 out of 5 pigs of group C. No animal exhibited signs of gas embolism or died during surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of compressed air for laparoscopy in pigs was safe, reduced costs and did not require the use of an automatic gas insufflator. |
publishDate |
2003 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2003 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2011-07-28T20:12:48Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-30T19:56:48Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
TIRABOSHI, Ricardo Brianezi et al . Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?. Acta Cir. Bras., São Paulo, 2011 . Available from <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502003001200004&lng=en&nrm=iso>. access on 28 July 2011. doi: 10.1590/S0102-86502003001200004. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/197 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0102-86502003001200004 |
identifier_str_mv |
TIRABOSHI, Ricardo Brianezi et al . Is CO2 gas unsufflator necessary for laparoscopic training in animals?. Acta Cir. Bras., São Paulo, 2011 . Available from <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502003001200004&lng=en&nrm=iso>. access on 28 July 2011. doi: 10.1590/S0102-86502003001200004. 10.1590/S0102-86502003001200004 |
url |
https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/197 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Cirurgica Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Cirurgica Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMS instname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS) instacron:UFMS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS) |
instacron_str |
UFMS |
institution |
UFMS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFMS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/4/Is%20CO2%20gas%20unsufflator%20necessary.pdf.jpg https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/1/Is%20CO2%20gas%20unsufflator%20necessary.pdf https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/2/license.txt https://repositorio.ufms.br/bitstream/123456789/197/3/Is%20CO2%20gas%20unsufflator%20necessary.pdf.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
28a65c552d3f74802cb80f0144e903ac f6187da501d2a706f17426d2f36adbf7 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 b9706cf896aa3aa9c6085d0ca5093928 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFMS - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ri.prograd@ufms.br |
_version_ |
1807552840828190720 |