Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502021000600205 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate and compare two types of different scaffolds in critical bone defects in rats. Methods Seventy male Wistar rats (280 ± 20 grams) divided into three groups: control group (CG), untreated animals; biomaterial group 1 (BG1), animals that received the scaffold implanted hydroxyapatite (HA)/poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA); and biomaterial group 2 (BG2), animals that received the scaffolds HA/PLGA/Bleed. The critical bone defect was induced in the medial region of the skull calotte with the aid of an 8-mm-diameter trephine drill. The biomaterial was implanted in the form of 1.5 mm thick scaffolds, and samples were collected after 15, 30 and 60 days. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used, with the significance level of 5% (p ≤ 0.05). Results Histology revealed morphological and structural differences of the neoformed tissue between the experimental groups. Collagen-1 (Col-1) findings are consistent with the histological ones, in which BG2 presented the highest amount of fibers in its tissue matrix in all evaluated periods. In contrast, the results of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (Rank-L) immunoexpression were higher in BG2 in the periods of 30 and 60 days, indicating an increase of the degradation of the biomaterial and the remodeling activity of the bone. Conclusions The properties of the HA/PLGA/Bleed scaffold were superior when compared to the scaffold composed only by HA/PLGA. |
id |
SBDPC-1_8582d2f8060e2aa213fc28f50032140b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-86502021000600205 |
network_acronym_str |
SBDPC-1 |
network_name_str |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in ratsBiocompatible MaterialsSkullBone RegenerationRatsABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate and compare two types of different scaffolds in critical bone defects in rats. Methods Seventy male Wistar rats (280 ± 20 grams) divided into three groups: control group (CG), untreated animals; biomaterial group 1 (BG1), animals that received the scaffold implanted hydroxyapatite (HA)/poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA); and biomaterial group 2 (BG2), animals that received the scaffolds HA/PLGA/Bleed. The critical bone defect was induced in the medial region of the skull calotte with the aid of an 8-mm-diameter trephine drill. The biomaterial was implanted in the form of 1.5 mm thick scaffolds, and samples were collected after 15, 30 and 60 days. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used, with the significance level of 5% (p ≤ 0.05). Results Histology revealed morphological and structural differences of the neoformed tissue between the experimental groups. Collagen-1 (Col-1) findings are consistent with the histological ones, in which BG2 presented the highest amount of fibers in its tissue matrix in all evaluated periods. In contrast, the results of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (Rank-L) immunoexpression were higher in BG2 in the periods of 30 and 60 days, indicating an increase of the degradation of the biomaterial and the remodeling activity of the bone. Conclusions The properties of the HA/PLGA/Bleed scaffold were superior when compared to the scaffold composed only by HA/PLGA.Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502021000600205Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.36 n.6 2021reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)instacron:SBDPC10.1590/acb360605info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrassolatti,PatriciaBossini,Paulo SérgioAndrade,Ana Laura Martins deLuna,Genoveva Lourdes FloresSilva,Juliana Virginio daAlmeida-Lopes,LucianaNapolitano,Marcos AurélioAvó,Lucimar Retto da Silva deLeal,Ângela Merice de OliveiraAnibal,Fernanda de Freitaseng2021-07-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-86502021000600205Revistahttps://www.bvs-vet.org.br/vetindex/periodicos/acta-cirurgica-brasileira/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sgolden@terra.com.br0102-86501678-2674opendoar:2021-07-16T00:00Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats |
title |
Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats Brassolatti,Patricia Biocompatible Materials Skull Bone Regeneration Rats |
title_short |
Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats |
title_full |
Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats |
title_sort |
Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats |
author |
Brassolatti,Patricia |
author_facet |
Brassolatti,Patricia Bossini,Paulo Sérgio Andrade,Ana Laura Martins de Luna,Genoveva Lourdes Flores Silva,Juliana Virginio da Almeida-Lopes,Luciana Napolitano,Marcos Aurélio Avó,Lucimar Retto da Silva de Leal,Ângela Merice de Oliveira Anibal,Fernanda de Freitas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bossini,Paulo Sérgio Andrade,Ana Laura Martins de Luna,Genoveva Lourdes Flores Silva,Juliana Virginio da Almeida-Lopes,Luciana Napolitano,Marcos Aurélio Avó,Lucimar Retto da Silva de Leal,Ângela Merice de Oliveira Anibal,Fernanda de Freitas |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brassolatti,Patricia Bossini,Paulo Sérgio Andrade,Ana Laura Martins de Luna,Genoveva Lourdes Flores Silva,Juliana Virginio da Almeida-Lopes,Luciana Napolitano,Marcos Aurélio Avó,Lucimar Retto da Silva de Leal,Ângela Merice de Oliveira Anibal,Fernanda de Freitas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biocompatible Materials Skull Bone Regeneration Rats |
topic |
Biocompatible Materials Skull Bone Regeneration Rats |
description |
ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate and compare two types of different scaffolds in critical bone defects in rats. Methods Seventy male Wistar rats (280 ± 20 grams) divided into three groups: control group (CG), untreated animals; biomaterial group 1 (BG1), animals that received the scaffold implanted hydroxyapatite (HA)/poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA); and biomaterial group 2 (BG2), animals that received the scaffolds HA/PLGA/Bleed. The critical bone defect was induced in the medial region of the skull calotte with the aid of an 8-mm-diameter trephine drill. The biomaterial was implanted in the form of 1.5 mm thick scaffolds, and samples were collected after 15, 30 and 60 days. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used, with the significance level of 5% (p ≤ 0.05). Results Histology revealed morphological and structural differences of the neoformed tissue between the experimental groups. Collagen-1 (Col-1) findings are consistent with the histological ones, in which BG2 presented the highest amount of fibers in its tissue matrix in all evaluated periods. In contrast, the results of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (Rank-L) immunoexpression were higher in BG2 in the periods of 30 and 60 days, indicating an increase of the degradation of the biomaterial and the remodeling activity of the bone. Conclusions The properties of the HA/PLGA/Bleed scaffold were superior when compared to the scaffold composed only by HA/PLGA. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502021000600205 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502021000600205 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/acb360605 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.36 n.6 2021 reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) instacron:SBDPC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) |
instacron_str |
SBDPC |
institution |
SBDPC |
reponame_str |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sgolden@terra.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126446251278336 |