Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brassolatti,Patricia
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Bossini,Paulo Sérgio, Andrade,Ana Laura Martins de, Luna,Genoveva Lourdes Flores, Silva,Juliana Virginio da, Almeida-Lopes,Luciana, Napolitano,Marcos Aurélio, Avó,Lucimar Retto da Silva de, Leal,Ângela Merice de Oliveira, Anibal,Fernanda de Freitas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502021000600205
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate and compare two types of different scaffolds in critical bone defects in rats. Methods Seventy male Wistar rats (280 ± 20 grams) divided into three groups: control group (CG), untreated animals; biomaterial group 1 (BG1), animals that received the scaffold implanted hydroxyapatite (HA)/poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA); and biomaterial group 2 (BG2), animals that received the scaffolds HA/PLGA/Bleed. The critical bone defect was induced in the medial region of the skull calotte with the aid of an 8-mm-diameter trephine drill. The biomaterial was implanted in the form of 1.5 mm thick scaffolds, and samples were collected after 15, 30 and 60 days. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used, with the significance level of 5% (p ≤ 0.05). Results Histology revealed morphological and structural differences of the neoformed tissue between the experimental groups. Collagen-1 (Col-1) findings are consistent with the histological ones, in which BG2 presented the highest amount of fibers in its tissue matrix in all evaluated periods. In contrast, the results of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (Rank-L) immunoexpression were higher in BG2 in the periods of 30 and 60 days, indicating an increase of the degradation of the biomaterial and the remodeling activity of the bone. Conclusions The properties of the HA/PLGA/Bleed scaffold were superior when compared to the scaffold composed only by HA/PLGA.
id SBDPC-1_8582d2f8060e2aa213fc28f50032140b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-86502021000600205
network_acronym_str SBDPC-1
network_name_str Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in ratsBiocompatible MaterialsSkullBone RegenerationRatsABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate and compare two types of different scaffolds in critical bone defects in rats. Methods Seventy male Wistar rats (280 ± 20 grams) divided into three groups: control group (CG), untreated animals; biomaterial group 1 (BG1), animals that received the scaffold implanted hydroxyapatite (HA)/poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA); and biomaterial group 2 (BG2), animals that received the scaffolds HA/PLGA/Bleed. The critical bone defect was induced in the medial region of the skull calotte with the aid of an 8-mm-diameter trephine drill. The biomaterial was implanted in the form of 1.5 mm thick scaffolds, and samples were collected after 15, 30 and 60 days. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used, with the significance level of 5% (p ≤ 0.05). Results Histology revealed morphological and structural differences of the neoformed tissue between the experimental groups. Collagen-1 (Col-1) findings are consistent with the histological ones, in which BG2 presented the highest amount of fibers in its tissue matrix in all evaluated periods. In contrast, the results of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (Rank-L) immunoexpression were higher in BG2 in the periods of 30 and 60 days, indicating an increase of the degradation of the biomaterial and the remodeling activity of the bone. Conclusions The properties of the HA/PLGA/Bleed scaffold were superior when compared to the scaffold composed only by HA/PLGA.Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502021000600205Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.36 n.6 2021reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)instacron:SBDPC10.1590/acb360605info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrassolatti,PatriciaBossini,Paulo SérgioAndrade,Ana Laura Martins deLuna,Genoveva Lourdes FloresSilva,Juliana Virginio daAlmeida-Lopes,LucianaNapolitano,Marcos AurélioAvó,Lucimar Retto da Silva deLeal,Ângela Merice de OliveiraAnibal,Fernanda de Freitaseng2021-07-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-86502021000600205Revistahttps://www.bvs-vet.org.br/vetindex/periodicos/acta-cirurgica-brasileira/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sgolden@terra.com.br0102-86501678-2674opendoar:2021-07-16T00:00Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats
title Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats
spellingShingle Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats
Brassolatti,Patricia
Biocompatible Materials
Skull
Bone Regeneration
Rats
title_short Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats
title_full Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats
title_fullStr Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats
title_sort Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats
author Brassolatti,Patricia
author_facet Brassolatti,Patricia
Bossini,Paulo Sérgio
Andrade,Ana Laura Martins de
Luna,Genoveva Lourdes Flores
Silva,Juliana Virginio da
Almeida-Lopes,Luciana
Napolitano,Marcos Aurélio
Avó,Lucimar Retto da Silva de
Leal,Ângela Merice de Oliveira
Anibal,Fernanda de Freitas
author_role author
author2 Bossini,Paulo Sérgio
Andrade,Ana Laura Martins de
Luna,Genoveva Lourdes Flores
Silva,Juliana Virginio da
Almeida-Lopes,Luciana
Napolitano,Marcos Aurélio
Avó,Lucimar Retto da Silva de
Leal,Ângela Merice de Oliveira
Anibal,Fernanda de Freitas
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brassolatti,Patricia
Bossini,Paulo Sérgio
Andrade,Ana Laura Martins de
Luna,Genoveva Lourdes Flores
Silva,Juliana Virginio da
Almeida-Lopes,Luciana
Napolitano,Marcos Aurélio
Avó,Lucimar Retto da Silva de
Leal,Ângela Merice de Oliveira
Anibal,Fernanda de Freitas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biocompatible Materials
Skull
Bone Regeneration
Rats
topic Biocompatible Materials
Skull
Bone Regeneration
Rats
description ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate and compare two types of different scaffolds in critical bone defects in rats. Methods Seventy male Wistar rats (280 ± 20 grams) divided into three groups: control group (CG), untreated animals; biomaterial group 1 (BG1), animals that received the scaffold implanted hydroxyapatite (HA)/poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA); and biomaterial group 2 (BG2), animals that received the scaffolds HA/PLGA/Bleed. The critical bone defect was induced in the medial region of the skull calotte with the aid of an 8-mm-diameter trephine drill. The biomaterial was implanted in the form of 1.5 mm thick scaffolds, and samples were collected after 15, 30 and 60 days. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used, with the significance level of 5% (p ≤ 0.05). Results Histology revealed morphological and structural differences of the neoformed tissue between the experimental groups. Collagen-1 (Col-1) findings are consistent with the histological ones, in which BG2 presented the highest amount of fibers in its tissue matrix in all evaluated periods. In contrast, the results of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (Rank-L) immunoexpression were higher in BG2 in the periods of 30 and 60 days, indicating an increase of the degradation of the biomaterial and the remodeling activity of the bone. Conclusions The properties of the HA/PLGA/Bleed scaffold were superior when compared to the scaffold composed only by HA/PLGA.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502021000600205
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502021000600205
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/acb360605
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.36 n.6 2021
reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
instacron:SBDPC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
instacron_str SBDPC
institution SBDPC
reponame_str Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
collection Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sgolden@terra.com.br
_version_ 1752126446251278336