Blunt abdominal trauma with small bowel injury: are isolated lesions riskier than associated lesions?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fraga,Gustavo Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Silva,Fernando Henrique Bergo de Souza e, Almeida,Nicolle Antunes de, Curi,Jorge Carlos Machado, Mantovani,Mario
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502008000200013
Resumo: PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare patients with "isolated" blunt small bowel injury (SBI) to patients with multiple intra-abdominal injuries and analyze whether delayed laparotomy affected outcome. METHODS: Medical records of patients that suffered a blunt SBI between 1994 and 2005 were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: those with isolated SBI and those with other associated intra-abdominal injuries ("non-isolated"). The method of diagnosis, time to operation, small bowel Organ Injury Scale (OIS) assessment (grade > 2), injury severity score (ISS), morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 62 (68.9%) isolated cases and 28 (31.1%) non-isolated cases. Isolated cases required more supplementary diagnostic methods than the non-isolated cases. Non-isolated cases had a shorter diagnosis to treatment period (p < .01) and a higher ISS (mean 22.5 vs. 17.2 in "isolated" group). Morbidity (51.6% and 53.6%) and mortality (16.1% and 28.6%) did not differ significantly between the isolated and non-isolated groups. Delays in diagnosis were common in the isolated group, but this did not affect outcome. Patients with associated injuries, and higher ISS, had higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of associated intra-abdominal injuries significantly affected the presentation and time to diagnosis of patients with SBI, but not morbidity or mortality. Delayed surgical treatment in the isolated cases was not associated with an increased incidence of complications. Patients inflicted with more severe associated injuries were less likely to survive the trauma.
id SBDPC-1_9890ab8d17e14d01c123ae52220f2b36
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-86502008000200013
network_acronym_str SBDPC-1
network_name_str Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Blunt abdominal trauma with small bowel injury: are isolated lesions riskier than associated lesions?TraumaSmall bowelJejunumIleumIntestinal fistulaPURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare patients with "isolated" blunt small bowel injury (SBI) to patients with multiple intra-abdominal injuries and analyze whether delayed laparotomy affected outcome. METHODS: Medical records of patients that suffered a blunt SBI between 1994 and 2005 were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: those with isolated SBI and those with other associated intra-abdominal injuries ("non-isolated"). The method of diagnosis, time to operation, small bowel Organ Injury Scale (OIS) assessment (grade > 2), injury severity score (ISS), morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 62 (68.9%) isolated cases and 28 (31.1%) non-isolated cases. Isolated cases required more supplementary diagnostic methods than the non-isolated cases. Non-isolated cases had a shorter diagnosis to treatment period (p < .01) and a higher ISS (mean 22.5 vs. 17.2 in "isolated" group). Morbidity (51.6% and 53.6%) and mortality (16.1% and 28.6%) did not differ significantly between the isolated and non-isolated groups. Delays in diagnosis were common in the isolated group, but this did not affect outcome. Patients with associated injuries, and higher ISS, had higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of associated intra-abdominal injuries significantly affected the presentation and time to diagnosis of patients with SBI, but not morbidity or mortality. Delayed surgical treatment in the isolated cases was not associated with an increased incidence of complications. Patients inflicted with more severe associated injuries were less likely to survive the trauma.Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia2008-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502008000200013Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.23 n.2 2008reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)instacron:SBDPC10.1590/S0102-86502008000200013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFraga,Gustavo PereiraSilva,Fernando Henrique Bergo de Souza eAlmeida,Nicolle Antunes deCuri,Jorge Carlos MachadoMantovani,Marioeng2008-03-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-86502008000200013Revistahttps://www.bvs-vet.org.br/vetindex/periodicos/acta-cirurgica-brasileira/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sgolden@terra.com.br0102-86501678-2674opendoar:2008-03-26T00:00Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Blunt abdominal trauma with small bowel injury: are isolated lesions riskier than associated lesions?
title Blunt abdominal trauma with small bowel injury: are isolated lesions riskier than associated lesions?
spellingShingle Blunt abdominal trauma with small bowel injury: are isolated lesions riskier than associated lesions?
Fraga,Gustavo Pereira
Trauma
Small bowel
Jejunum
Ileum
Intestinal fistula
title_short Blunt abdominal trauma with small bowel injury: are isolated lesions riskier than associated lesions?
title_full Blunt abdominal trauma with small bowel injury: are isolated lesions riskier than associated lesions?
title_fullStr Blunt abdominal trauma with small bowel injury: are isolated lesions riskier than associated lesions?
title_full_unstemmed Blunt abdominal trauma with small bowel injury: are isolated lesions riskier than associated lesions?
title_sort Blunt abdominal trauma with small bowel injury: are isolated lesions riskier than associated lesions?
author Fraga,Gustavo Pereira
author_facet Fraga,Gustavo Pereira
Silva,Fernando Henrique Bergo de Souza e
Almeida,Nicolle Antunes de
Curi,Jorge Carlos Machado
Mantovani,Mario
author_role author
author2 Silva,Fernando Henrique Bergo de Souza e
Almeida,Nicolle Antunes de
Curi,Jorge Carlos Machado
Mantovani,Mario
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fraga,Gustavo Pereira
Silva,Fernando Henrique Bergo de Souza e
Almeida,Nicolle Antunes de
Curi,Jorge Carlos Machado
Mantovani,Mario
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Trauma
Small bowel
Jejunum
Ileum
Intestinal fistula
topic Trauma
Small bowel
Jejunum
Ileum
Intestinal fistula
description PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare patients with "isolated" blunt small bowel injury (SBI) to patients with multiple intra-abdominal injuries and analyze whether delayed laparotomy affected outcome. METHODS: Medical records of patients that suffered a blunt SBI between 1994 and 2005 were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: those with isolated SBI and those with other associated intra-abdominal injuries ("non-isolated"). The method of diagnosis, time to operation, small bowel Organ Injury Scale (OIS) assessment (grade > 2), injury severity score (ISS), morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 62 (68.9%) isolated cases and 28 (31.1%) non-isolated cases. Isolated cases required more supplementary diagnostic methods than the non-isolated cases. Non-isolated cases had a shorter diagnosis to treatment period (p < .01) and a higher ISS (mean 22.5 vs. 17.2 in "isolated" group). Morbidity (51.6% and 53.6%) and mortality (16.1% and 28.6%) did not differ significantly between the isolated and non-isolated groups. Delays in diagnosis were common in the isolated group, but this did not affect outcome. Patients with associated injuries, and higher ISS, had higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of associated intra-abdominal injuries significantly affected the presentation and time to diagnosis of patients with SBI, but not morbidity or mortality. Delayed surgical treatment in the isolated cases was not associated with an increased incidence of complications. Patients inflicted with more severe associated injuries were less likely to survive the trauma.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502008000200013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-86502008000200013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0102-86502008000200013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira v.23 n.2 2008
reponame:Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
instacron:SBDPC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
instacron_str SBDPC
institution SBDPC
reponame_str Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
collection Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia (SBDPC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sgolden@terra.com.br
_version_ 1752126439094747136