TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND IMPLEMENTATION COSTS OF SHEEP IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bezerra,Alan C.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Pandorfi,Héliton, Carvalho,Francisco F. R. E, Guiselini,Cristiane, Lima,Thiago A. S. de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Engenharia Agrícola
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162017000501073
Resumo: ABSTRACT: The objective of this research was to characterize the efficiency and convenience of sheep identification system and its implementation costs. Therefore we quantified the time for implementation, reading and data transfer to a management program in a manual system (earrings) and electronic system (subcutaneous transponders). Furthermore, it was evaluated the implementation costs of the traceability systems by analysis of the absorption costs and comparison between systems. It was observed that the implementation time for the manual system was shorter (2.2 s animal−1) than the electronic system (4.67 s animal−1). As for reading time, the electronic system presented shorter time (2.89 s animal−1) than the manual system (4.67 s animal−1). As for the data transfer time, the electronic system also presented shorter time (16 s) than manual system (6 min and 42 s). In terms of economic costs, the manual system presented lower implementation costs and lower values per tracked animal to ensure the economic viability. In conclusion, the producer must analyze the context around the production unit to choose the best traceability system.
id SBEA-1_76ec5475a546b145c3ea4a340aee4b6e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69162017000501073
network_acronym_str SBEA-1
network_name_str Engenharia Agrícola
repository_id_str
spelling TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND IMPLEMENTATION COSTS OF SHEEP IDENTIFICATION SYSTEManimal identificationsheep productiontraceabilityABSTRACT: The objective of this research was to characterize the efficiency and convenience of sheep identification system and its implementation costs. Therefore we quantified the time for implementation, reading and data transfer to a management program in a manual system (earrings) and electronic system (subcutaneous transponders). Furthermore, it was evaluated the implementation costs of the traceability systems by analysis of the absorption costs and comparison between systems. It was observed that the implementation time for the manual system was shorter (2.2 s animal−1) than the electronic system (4.67 s animal−1). As for reading time, the electronic system presented shorter time (2.89 s animal−1) than the manual system (4.67 s animal−1). As for the data transfer time, the electronic system also presented shorter time (16 s) than manual system (6 min and 42 s). In terms of economic costs, the manual system presented lower implementation costs and lower values per tracked animal to ensure the economic viability. In conclusion, the producer must analyze the context around the production unit to choose the best traceability system.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2017-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162017000501073Engenharia Agrícola v.37 n.5 2017reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v37n5p1073-1080/2017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBezerra,Alan C.Pandorfi,HélitonCarvalho,Francisco F. R. EGuiselini,CristianeLima,Thiago A. S. deeng2017-09-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162017000501073Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2017-09-18T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND IMPLEMENTATION COSTS OF SHEEP IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM
title TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND IMPLEMENTATION COSTS OF SHEEP IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM
spellingShingle TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND IMPLEMENTATION COSTS OF SHEEP IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM
Bezerra,Alan C.
animal identification
sheep production
traceability
title_short TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND IMPLEMENTATION COSTS OF SHEEP IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM
title_full TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND IMPLEMENTATION COSTS OF SHEEP IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM
title_fullStr TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND IMPLEMENTATION COSTS OF SHEEP IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM
title_full_unstemmed TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND IMPLEMENTATION COSTS OF SHEEP IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM
title_sort TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY AND IMPLEMENTATION COSTS OF SHEEP IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM
author Bezerra,Alan C.
author_facet Bezerra,Alan C.
Pandorfi,Héliton
Carvalho,Francisco F. R. E
Guiselini,Cristiane
Lima,Thiago A. S. de
author_role author
author2 Pandorfi,Héliton
Carvalho,Francisco F. R. E
Guiselini,Cristiane
Lima,Thiago A. S. de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bezerra,Alan C.
Pandorfi,Héliton
Carvalho,Francisco F. R. E
Guiselini,Cristiane
Lima,Thiago A. S. de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv animal identification
sheep production
traceability
topic animal identification
sheep production
traceability
description ABSTRACT: The objective of this research was to characterize the efficiency and convenience of sheep identification system and its implementation costs. Therefore we quantified the time for implementation, reading and data transfer to a management program in a manual system (earrings) and electronic system (subcutaneous transponders). Furthermore, it was evaluated the implementation costs of the traceability systems by analysis of the absorption costs and comparison between systems. It was observed that the implementation time for the manual system was shorter (2.2 s animal−1) than the electronic system (4.67 s animal−1). As for reading time, the electronic system presented shorter time (2.89 s animal−1) than the manual system (4.67 s animal−1). As for the data transfer time, the electronic system also presented shorter time (16 s) than manual system (6 min and 42 s). In terms of economic costs, the manual system presented lower implementation costs and lower values per tracked animal to ensure the economic viability. In conclusion, the producer must analyze the context around the production unit to choose the best traceability system.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162017000501073
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162017000501073
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v37n5p1073-1080/2017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola v.37 n.5 2017
reponame:Engenharia Agrícola
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron:SBEA
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron_str SBEA
institution SBEA
reponame_str Engenharia Agrícola
collection Engenharia Agrícola
repository.name.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br
_version_ 1752126273581219840