COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN PER-PIXEL AND OBJECT-ORIENTED FOR MAPPING LAND COVER AND USE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Prudente,Victor H. R.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Silva,Bruno B. da, Johann,Jerry A., Mercante,Erivelto, Oldoni,Lucas V.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Engenharia Agrícola
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162017000501015
Resumo: ABSTRACT: The traditional per-pixel classification methods consider only spectral information, and may be limited. Object-based classifiers, however, also consider shape and texture, firstly segmenting the image, and then classifying individual objects. Thus, a Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA) was compared in conjunction with data mining techniques and a traditional per-pixel method. A cut of Landsat-8, bands 2 to 7, orbit/point 223/77, located between the municipalities of Cascavel, Corbélia, Cafelândia and Tupãssi, in the west part of the state of Paraná, from 12/18/2013 was used. In the GEOBIA approach was realized image segmentation, spatial and spectral attribute extraction, and classification using the decision tree supervised algorithm, J48. For the per-pixel method, we used the supervised Maximum Likelihood Classifier. Both approaches presented equivalent results, with Kappa Index of 0.75 and Global Accuracy (GA) of 78.97% for the approach by GEOBIA and Kappa Index of 0.72 and GA of 77.44% for the perpixel classification. The classification by GEOBIA showed better accuracy for the soil, forest and soybean classes, and did not show the splash aspect, which visually improves the classification result.
id SBEA-1_855b32f538fe0f2e0d10023e537e0f36
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69162017000501015
network_acronym_str SBEA-1
network_name_str Engenharia Agrícola
repository_id_str
spelling COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN PER-PIXEL AND OBJECT-ORIENTED FOR MAPPING LAND COVER AND USEGeoDMAdata miningdecision treeABSTRACT: The traditional per-pixel classification methods consider only spectral information, and may be limited. Object-based classifiers, however, also consider shape and texture, firstly segmenting the image, and then classifying individual objects. Thus, a Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA) was compared in conjunction with data mining techniques and a traditional per-pixel method. A cut of Landsat-8, bands 2 to 7, orbit/point 223/77, located between the municipalities of Cascavel, Corbélia, Cafelândia and Tupãssi, in the west part of the state of Paraná, from 12/18/2013 was used. In the GEOBIA approach was realized image segmentation, spatial and spectral attribute extraction, and classification using the decision tree supervised algorithm, J48. For the per-pixel method, we used the supervised Maximum Likelihood Classifier. Both approaches presented equivalent results, with Kappa Index of 0.75 and Global Accuracy (GA) of 78.97% for the approach by GEOBIA and Kappa Index of 0.72 and GA of 77.44% for the perpixel classification. The classification by GEOBIA showed better accuracy for the soil, forest and soybean classes, and did not show the splash aspect, which visually improves the classification result.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2017-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162017000501015Engenharia Agrícola v.37 n.5 2017reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v37n5p1015-1027/2017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPrudente,Victor H. R.Silva,Bruno B. daJohann,Jerry A.Mercante,EriveltoOldoni,Lucas V.eng2017-09-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162017000501015Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2017-09-18T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN PER-PIXEL AND OBJECT-ORIENTED FOR MAPPING LAND COVER AND USE
title COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN PER-PIXEL AND OBJECT-ORIENTED FOR MAPPING LAND COVER AND USE
spellingShingle COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN PER-PIXEL AND OBJECT-ORIENTED FOR MAPPING LAND COVER AND USE
Prudente,Victor H. R.
GeoDMA
data mining
decision tree
title_short COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN PER-PIXEL AND OBJECT-ORIENTED FOR MAPPING LAND COVER AND USE
title_full COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN PER-PIXEL AND OBJECT-ORIENTED FOR MAPPING LAND COVER AND USE
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN PER-PIXEL AND OBJECT-ORIENTED FOR MAPPING LAND COVER AND USE
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN PER-PIXEL AND OBJECT-ORIENTED FOR MAPPING LAND COVER AND USE
title_sort COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT BETWEEN PER-PIXEL AND OBJECT-ORIENTED FOR MAPPING LAND COVER AND USE
author Prudente,Victor H. R.
author_facet Prudente,Victor H. R.
Silva,Bruno B. da
Johann,Jerry A.
Mercante,Erivelto
Oldoni,Lucas V.
author_role author
author2 Silva,Bruno B. da
Johann,Jerry A.
Mercante,Erivelto
Oldoni,Lucas V.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Prudente,Victor H. R.
Silva,Bruno B. da
Johann,Jerry A.
Mercante,Erivelto
Oldoni,Lucas V.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv GeoDMA
data mining
decision tree
topic GeoDMA
data mining
decision tree
description ABSTRACT: The traditional per-pixel classification methods consider only spectral information, and may be limited. Object-based classifiers, however, also consider shape and texture, firstly segmenting the image, and then classifying individual objects. Thus, a Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA) was compared in conjunction with data mining techniques and a traditional per-pixel method. A cut of Landsat-8, bands 2 to 7, orbit/point 223/77, located between the municipalities of Cascavel, Corbélia, Cafelândia and Tupãssi, in the west part of the state of Paraná, from 12/18/2013 was used. In the GEOBIA approach was realized image segmentation, spatial and spectral attribute extraction, and classification using the decision tree supervised algorithm, J48. For the per-pixel method, we used the supervised Maximum Likelihood Classifier. Both approaches presented equivalent results, with Kappa Index of 0.75 and Global Accuracy (GA) of 78.97% for the approach by GEOBIA and Kappa Index of 0.72 and GA of 77.44% for the perpixel classification. The classification by GEOBIA showed better accuracy for the soil, forest and soybean classes, and did not show the splash aspect, which visually improves the classification result.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162017000501015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162017000501015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v37n5p1015-1027/2017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola v.37 n.5 2017
reponame:Engenharia Agrícola
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron:SBEA
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron_str SBEA
institution SBEA
reponame_str Engenharia Agrícola
collection Engenharia Agrícola
repository.name.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br
_version_ 1752126273569685504