Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvest

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha,João P. A. R. da
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Martins,Daniel H., Cunha,Walter G. da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Engenharia Agrícola
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000400020
Resumo: Potato is an important crop plant throughout the world. Harvesting is a fundamental step in its production system. Maybe, it is the most complex and expensive operation. Thus, the objective of this work was to compare the cost of the mechanized and semi-mechanized harvest, the operational capacity and the production losses during the potato harvest process. The work was accomplished in a commercial farming, cultivated under pivot system, in the municipal district of Perdizes - MG, Brazil. A completely randomized design with two treatments was used: mechanized and semi-mechanized harvest. The mechanized harvest used a self-propelled harvester. In the semi-automated harvest, a digger mounted on tractor was used and the potato was manually harvested. It was concluded that the cost of mechanized harvest was 49.03% lower than the cost of semi-mechanized harvest. On average, the harvester had a work for 23 workers in manual harvest. Mechanized harvest showed losses of 2.35% of potato yield, while the semi-mechanized harvest showed losses of 6.32%.
id SBEA-1_f2f5ebb3463127e38adb635da55fa9c0
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69162011000400020
network_acronym_str SBEA-1
network_name_str Engenharia Agrícola
repository_id_str
spelling Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvestmechanical harvestfield efficiencyoperational costSolanum tuberosumPotato is an important crop plant throughout the world. Harvesting is a fundamental step in its production system. Maybe, it is the most complex and expensive operation. Thus, the objective of this work was to compare the cost of the mechanized and semi-mechanized harvest, the operational capacity and the production losses during the potato harvest process. The work was accomplished in a commercial farming, cultivated under pivot system, in the municipal district of Perdizes - MG, Brazil. A completely randomized design with two treatments was used: mechanized and semi-mechanized harvest. The mechanized harvest used a self-propelled harvester. In the semi-automated harvest, a digger mounted on tractor was used and the potato was manually harvested. It was concluded that the cost of mechanized harvest was 49.03% lower than the cost of semi-mechanized harvest. On average, the harvester had a work for 23 workers in manual harvest. Mechanized harvest showed losses of 2.35% of potato yield, while the semi-mechanized harvest showed losses of 6.32%.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000400020Engenharia Agrícola v.31 n.4 2011reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/S0100-69162011000400020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha,João P. A. R. daMartins,Daniel H.Cunha,Walter G. daeng2011-09-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162011000400020Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2011-09-22T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvest
title Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvest
spellingShingle Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvest
Cunha,João P. A. R. da
mechanical harvest
field efficiency
operational cost
Solanum tuberosum
title_short Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvest
title_full Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvest
title_fullStr Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvest
title_full_unstemmed Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvest
title_sort Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvest
author Cunha,João P. A. R. da
author_facet Cunha,João P. A. R. da
Martins,Daniel H.
Cunha,Walter G. da
author_role author
author2 Martins,Daniel H.
Cunha,Walter G. da
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha,João P. A. R. da
Martins,Daniel H.
Cunha,Walter G. da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv mechanical harvest
field efficiency
operational cost
Solanum tuberosum
topic mechanical harvest
field efficiency
operational cost
Solanum tuberosum
description Potato is an important crop plant throughout the world. Harvesting is a fundamental step in its production system. Maybe, it is the most complex and expensive operation. Thus, the objective of this work was to compare the cost of the mechanized and semi-mechanized harvest, the operational capacity and the production losses during the potato harvest process. The work was accomplished in a commercial farming, cultivated under pivot system, in the municipal district of Perdizes - MG, Brazil. A completely randomized design with two treatments was used: mechanized and semi-mechanized harvest. The mechanized harvest used a self-propelled harvester. In the semi-automated harvest, a digger mounted on tractor was used and the potato was manually harvested. It was concluded that the cost of mechanized harvest was 49.03% lower than the cost of semi-mechanized harvest. On average, the harvester had a work for 23 workers in manual harvest. Mechanized harvest showed losses of 2.35% of potato yield, while the semi-mechanized harvest showed losses of 6.32%.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000400020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162011000400020
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-69162011000400020
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola v.31 n.4 2011
reponame:Engenharia Agrícola
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron:SBEA
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron_str SBEA
institution SBEA
reponame_str Engenharia Agrícola
collection Engenharia Agrícola
repository.name.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br
_version_ 1752126270608506880