Effects of backpack loads and positions on the variability of gait spatiotemporal parameters in young adults

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lehnen,Georgia Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Magnani,Rina Marcia, Sá e Souza,Gustavo Souto de, Rodrigues,Fábio Barbosa, Andrade,Adriano de Oliveira, Vieira,Marcus Fraga
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2446-47402017000400277
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: People carry backpacks of different weight in different positions every day. The effects of backpack wearing under different loads and positions were assessed according to the gait’s spatiotemporal parameters and their variability in young adults. Methods Twenty-one subjects performed trials of 4 min in the conditions: control condition with no backpack; bilateral back load consisting of 10% body weight (BW); bilateral back load of 20% BW (B20); unilateral load of 10% BW; unilateral load with 20% BW (U20); bilateral frontal load with 10% BW; bilateral frontal load with 20% BW. Results Step length (SL) and step frequency (SF) show that frontal conditions differed from others as seen in B20. Gait cycle phases showed an increase in the B20 condition for double stance phase and stance phase, swing phase presented reduction in the B20 condition. There were significant main effects in position for SL, SF, and walk ratio, in load only for stride width. The highest variability of spatiotemporal parameters occurred in the U20 condition. All load conditions with 20% BW showed a greater variability when compared to the 10% BW counterpart. Conclusion We concluded that young adults can cope with up to a 15% BW load under a bilateral back position, but in the frontal position not even a 10% BW load was proven to be a safe limit. 20% BW loads should be avoided in any position. These recommendations may assure increased gait stability, decreased trunk forward lean and decreased muscle activation and fatigue reducing back pain occurrence.
id SBEB-1_75083cfc29359046a4144f899b9bf10b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2446-47402017000400277
network_acronym_str SBEB-1
network_name_str Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effects of backpack loads and positions on the variability of gait spatiotemporal parameters in young adultsHuman gaitStance phaseSwing phaseWalk ratioStride widthGait variabilityAbstract Introduction: People carry backpacks of different weight in different positions every day. The effects of backpack wearing under different loads and positions were assessed according to the gait’s spatiotemporal parameters and their variability in young adults. Methods Twenty-one subjects performed trials of 4 min in the conditions: control condition with no backpack; bilateral back load consisting of 10% body weight (BW); bilateral back load of 20% BW (B20); unilateral load of 10% BW; unilateral load with 20% BW (U20); bilateral frontal load with 10% BW; bilateral frontal load with 20% BW. Results Step length (SL) and step frequency (SF) show that frontal conditions differed from others as seen in B20. Gait cycle phases showed an increase in the B20 condition for double stance phase and stance phase, swing phase presented reduction in the B20 condition. There were significant main effects in position for SL, SF, and walk ratio, in load only for stride width. The highest variability of spatiotemporal parameters occurred in the U20 condition. All load conditions with 20% BW showed a greater variability when compared to the 10% BW counterpart. Conclusion We concluded that young adults can cope with up to a 15% BW load under a bilateral back position, but in the frontal position not even a 10% BW load was proven to be a safe limit. 20% BW loads should be avoided in any position. These recommendations may assure increased gait stability, decreased trunk forward lean and decreased muscle activation and fatigue reducing back pain occurrence.Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica2017-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2446-47402017000400277Research on Biomedical Engineering v.33 n.4 2017reponame:Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB)instacron:SBEB10.1590/2446-4740.03517info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLehnen,Georgia CristinaMagnani,Rina MarciaSá e Souza,Gustavo Souto deRodrigues,Fábio BarbosaAndrade,Adriano de OliveiraVieira,Marcus Fragaeng2018-01-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2446-47402017000400277Revistahttp://www.rbejournal.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbe@rbejournal.org2446-47402446-4732opendoar:2018-01-09T00:00Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of backpack loads and positions on the variability of gait spatiotemporal parameters in young adults
title Effects of backpack loads and positions on the variability of gait spatiotemporal parameters in young adults
spellingShingle Effects of backpack loads and positions on the variability of gait spatiotemporal parameters in young adults
Lehnen,Georgia Cristina
Human gait
Stance phase
Swing phase
Walk ratio
Stride width
Gait variability
title_short Effects of backpack loads and positions on the variability of gait spatiotemporal parameters in young adults
title_full Effects of backpack loads and positions on the variability of gait spatiotemporal parameters in young adults
title_fullStr Effects of backpack loads and positions on the variability of gait spatiotemporal parameters in young adults
title_full_unstemmed Effects of backpack loads and positions on the variability of gait spatiotemporal parameters in young adults
title_sort Effects of backpack loads and positions on the variability of gait spatiotemporal parameters in young adults
author Lehnen,Georgia Cristina
author_facet Lehnen,Georgia Cristina
Magnani,Rina Marcia
Sá e Souza,Gustavo Souto de
Rodrigues,Fábio Barbosa
Andrade,Adriano de Oliveira
Vieira,Marcus Fraga
author_role author
author2 Magnani,Rina Marcia
Sá e Souza,Gustavo Souto de
Rodrigues,Fábio Barbosa
Andrade,Adriano de Oliveira
Vieira,Marcus Fraga
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lehnen,Georgia Cristina
Magnani,Rina Marcia
Sá e Souza,Gustavo Souto de
Rodrigues,Fábio Barbosa
Andrade,Adriano de Oliveira
Vieira,Marcus Fraga
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Human gait
Stance phase
Swing phase
Walk ratio
Stride width
Gait variability
topic Human gait
Stance phase
Swing phase
Walk ratio
Stride width
Gait variability
description Abstract Introduction: People carry backpacks of different weight in different positions every day. The effects of backpack wearing under different loads and positions were assessed according to the gait’s spatiotemporal parameters and their variability in young adults. Methods Twenty-one subjects performed trials of 4 min in the conditions: control condition with no backpack; bilateral back load consisting of 10% body weight (BW); bilateral back load of 20% BW (B20); unilateral load of 10% BW; unilateral load with 20% BW (U20); bilateral frontal load with 10% BW; bilateral frontal load with 20% BW. Results Step length (SL) and step frequency (SF) show that frontal conditions differed from others as seen in B20. Gait cycle phases showed an increase in the B20 condition for double stance phase and stance phase, swing phase presented reduction in the B20 condition. There were significant main effects in position for SL, SF, and walk ratio, in load only for stride width. The highest variability of spatiotemporal parameters occurred in the U20 condition. All load conditions with 20% BW showed a greater variability when compared to the 10% BW counterpart. Conclusion We concluded that young adults can cope with up to a 15% BW load under a bilateral back position, but in the frontal position not even a 10% BW load was proven to be a safe limit. 20% BW loads should be avoided in any position. These recommendations may assure increased gait stability, decreased trunk forward lean and decreased muscle activation and fatigue reducing back pain occurrence.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2446-47402017000400277
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2446-47402017000400277
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2446-4740.03517
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research on Biomedical Engineering v.33 n.4 2017
reponame:Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB)
instacron:SBEB
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB)
instacron_str SBEB
institution SBEB
reponame_str Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online)
collection Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research on Biomedical Engineering (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Engenharia Biomédica (SBEB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbe@rbejournal.org
_version_ 1752126288756211712